Skip to main content

Home/ Teaching and Learning with Web 2.0/ Group items matching "between" in title, tags, annotations or url

Group items matching
in title, tags, annotations or url

Sort By: Relevance | Date Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
padminiprwatech

Key Differences between Hadoop and Apache Spark - learnbigdata.over-blog.com - 0 views

  •  
    Get to know more about the differences between Hadoop and Apache Spark.
Barbara Lindsey

Jean Lave, Etienne Wenger and communities of practice - 1 views

  • Supposing learning is social and comes largely from of our experience of participating in daily life? It was this thought that formed the basis of a significant rethinking of learning theory in the late 1980s and early 1990s by two researchers from very different disciplines - Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger. Their model of situated learning proposed that learning involved a process of engagement in a 'community of practice'. 
  • When looking closely at everyday activity, she has argued, it is clear that 'learning is ubiquitous in ongoing activity, though often unrecognized as such' (Lave 1993: 5).
  • Communities of practice are formed by people who engage in a process of collective learning in a shared domain of human endeavour: a tribe learning to survive, a band of artists seeking new forms of expression, a group of engineers working on similar problems, a clique of pupils defining their identity in the school, a network of surgeons exploring novel techniques, a gathering of first-time managers helping each other cope. In a nutshell: Communities of practice are groups of people who share a concern or a passion for something they do and learn how to do it better as they interact regularly. (Wenger circa 2007)
  • ...18 more annotations...
  • Over time, this collective learning results in practices that reflect both the pursuit of our enterprises and the attendant social relations. These practices are thus the property of a kind of community created over time by the sustained pursuit of a shared enterprise. It makes sense, therefore to call these kinds of communities communities of practice. (Wenger 1998: 45)
  • The characteristics of communities of practice According to Etienne Wenger (c 2007), three elements are crucial in distinguishing a community of practice from other groups and communities: The domain. A community of practice is is something more than a club of friends or a network of connections between people. 'It has an identity defined by a shared domain of interest. Membership therefore implies a commitment to the domain, and therefore a shared competence that distinguishes members from other people' (op. cit.). The community. 'In pursuing their interest in their domain, members engage in joint activities and discussions, help each other, and share information. They build relationships that enable them to learn from each other' (op. cit.). The practice. 'Members of a community of practice are practitioners. They develop a shared repertoire of resources: experiences, stories, tools, ways of addressing recurring problems—in short a shared practice. This takes time and sustained interaction' (op. cit.).
  • The fact that they are organizing around some particular area of knowledge and activity gives members a sense of joint enterprise and identity. For a community of practice to function it needs to generate and appropriate a shared repertoire of ideas, commitments and memories. It also needs to develop various resources such as tools, documents, routines, vocabulary and symbols that in some way carry the accumulated knowledge of the community.
  • The interactions involved, and the ability to undertake larger or more complex activities and projects though cooperation, bind people together and help to facilitate relationship and trust
  • Rather than looking to learning as the acquisition of certain forms of knowledge, Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger have tried to place it in social relationships – situations of co-participation.
  • It not so much that learners acquire structures or models to understand the world, but they participate in frameworks that that have structure. Learning involves participation in a community of practice. And that participation 'refers not just to local events of engagement in certain activities with certain people, but to a more encompassing process of being active participants in the practices of social communities and constructing identities in relation to these communities' (Wenger 1999: 4).
  • Initially people have to join communities and learn at the periphery. The things they are involved in, the tasks they do may be less key to the community than others.
  • Learning is, thus, not seen as the acquisition of knowledge by individuals so much as a process of social participation. The nature of the situation impacts significantly on the process.
  • What is more, and in contrast with learning as internalization, ‘learning as increasing participation in communities of practice concerns the whole person acting in the world’ (Lave and Wenger 1991: 49). The focus is on the ways in which learning is ‘an evolving, continuously renewed set of relations’ (ibid.: 50). In other words, this is a relational view of the person and learning (see the discussion of selfhood).
  • 'the purpose is not to learn from talk as a substitute for legitimate peripheral participation; it is to learn to talk as a key to legitimate peripheral participation'. This orientation has the definite advantage of drawing attention to the need to understand knowledge and learning in context. However, situated learning depends on two claims: It makes no sense to talk of knowledge that is decontextualized, abstract or general. New knowledge and learning are properly conceived as being located in communities of practice (Tennant 1997: 77).
  • There is a risk, as Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger acknowledge, of romanticizing communities of practice.
  • 'In their eagerness to debunk testing, formal education and formal accreditation, they do not analyse how their omission [of a range of questions and issues] affects power relations, access, public knowledge and public accountability' (Tennant 1997: 79).
  • Perhaps the most helpful of these explorations is that of Barbara Rogoff and her colleagues (2001). They examine the work of an innovative school in Salt Lake City and how teachers, students and parents were able to work together to develop an approach to schooling based around the principle that learning 'occurs through interested participation with other learners'.
  • Learning is in the relationships between people. As McDermott (in Murphy 1999:17) puts it: Learning traditionally gets measured as on the assumption that it is a possession of individuals that can be found inside their heads… [Here] learning is in the relationships between people. Learning is in the conditions that bring people together and organize a point of contact that allows for particular pieces of information to take on a relevance; without the points of contact, without the system of relevancies, there is not learning, and there is little memory. Learning does not belong to individual persons, but to the various conversations of which they are a part.
  • One of the implications for schools, as Barbara Rogoff and her colleagues suggest is that they must prioritize 'instruction that builds on children's interests in a collaborative way'. Such schools need also to be places where 'learning activities are planned by children as well as adults, and where parents and teachers not only foster children's learning but also learn from their own involvement with children' (2001: 3). Their example in this area have particular force as they are derived from actual school practice.
  • learning involves a deepening process of participation in a community of practice
  • Acknowledging that communities of practice affect performance is important in part because of their potential to overcome the inherent problems of a slow-moving traditional hierarchy in a fast-moving virtual economy. Communities also appear to be an effective way for organizations to handle unstructured problems and to share knowledge outside of the traditional structural boundaries. In addition, the community concept is acknowledged to be a means of developing and maintaining long-term organizational memory. These outcomes are an important, yet often unrecognized, supplement to the value that individual members of a community obtain in the form of enriched learning and higher motivation to apply what they learn. (Lesser and Storck 2001)
  • Educators need to reflect on their understanding of what constitutes knowledge and practice. Perhaps one of the most important things to grasp here is the extent to which education involves informed and committed action.
Mari Yamauchi

Do nontask interactions matter? The relationship between nontask sociability of computer supported collaborative learning and learning outcomes - Abedin - 2011 - British Journal of Educational Technology - Wiley Online Library - 2 views

  •  
    Do nontask interactions matter? The relationship between nontask sociability of SCCL and learning ... (Abedin et al 2011) http://ow.ly/4Ezs9
Eddie  Perej

Loans Bad Credit  - Instant Cash Help Facilitate Bad Creditor Before Payday - 0 views

  •  
    Short term offers faster way to get easy money for small financial exigency between two paydays. Apply now without face any credit check process through online way.
  •  
    Short term offers faster way to get easy money for small financial exigency between two paydays. Apply now without face any credit check process through online way.
buyetsy

Buy Verified Paxful Account - 100% Safe & Best Accounts. - 0 views

  •  
    Buy Verified Paxful Account Introduction A person-to-person marketplace called Paxful accepts more than 300 different payment methods. Direct trading in a wide range of currencies is possible between buyers and sellers. Both buyers and vendors on Paxful are free. An inexpensive fee is instead added to each transaction to encourage buyers and sellers to use the site. What is Paxful Account? For those wishing to purchase bitcoin using a number of payment methods, Paxful is a popular option. Paxful does come with some hazards, too. There is neither a buyer nor a seller protection on Paxful because it is a peer-to-peer marketplace. This implies that you are helpless if a trade fails. Because of this, it's crucial to only conduct business with reliable parties. Buy Verified Paxful Account
  •  
    Buy Verified Paxful Account Introduction A person-to-person marketplace called Paxful accepts more than 300 different payment methods. Direct trading in a wide range of currencies is possible between buyers and sellers. Both buyers and vendors on Paxful are free. An inexpensive fee is instead added to each transaction to encourage buyers and sellers to use the site. What is Paxful Account? For those wishing to purchase bitcoin using a number of payment methods, Paxful is a popular option. Paxful does come with some hazards, too. There is neither a buyer nor a seller protection on Paxful because it is a peer-to-peer marketplace. This implies that you are helpless if a trade fails. Because of this, it's crucial to only conduct business with reliable parties. Buy Verified Paxful Account
  •  
    Buy Verified Paxful Account Introduction A person-to-person marketplace called Paxful accepts more than 300 different payment methods. Direct trading in a wide range of currencies is possible between buyers and sellers. Both buyers and vendors on Paxful are free. An inexpensive fee is instead added to each transaction to encourage buyers and sellers to use the site.
elliswhite5

Buy Google 5 Star Reviews - 100% Non-Drop,Safe,Real 5 Star Reviews.... - 0 views

  •  
    Buy Google 5 Star Reviews Introduction If you have a business and need to get more customers, the Google 5 Star Reviews service is an excellent way to do it. This will help your business get more customers on the internet and grow its brand. Google 5-Star Reviews Service The Google reviews service is a way to get 5-star reviews from your customers. It's a very simple process and can be completed in just a few minutes, which makes it ideal for businesses that want to improve their online reputation but don't have time or money for traditional marketing techniques. Buy Google 5 Star Reviews Google Reviews Service Costs: There are three different ways you can use this service: You can pay $3 per review submitted through the Google site; You can pay $10 per month (or $99 annually), which includes an integrated email address where they will send out all customer emails sent by you; Or you can pay $25 per month (or $250 annually), which includes access to all other features of our platform as well as automated scheduling capabilities so that we know when exactly each company should post its latest review! Can you pay for 5 star google reviews? Yes, you can buy Google 5 Star Reviews. You can pay for verified Google 5 Star Reviews and reviews from people that have been working in the service industry for years. You can get a lot of information about a business or individual on Google by searching their name or title and seeing what comes up in the search results. If this person has written reviews on Google then they are probably telling you the truth about their experience with that company or individual. Buy Google 5 Star Reviews We're not just talking about content either-we mean real time human interaction that actually takes place between two living, breathing humans who happen to be talking face-to-face right now! Why should you buy google 5 star reviews from online? We are the best platform for you to get your business listed in Google. We have an exper
  •  
    Buy Google 5 Star Reviews Introduction If you have a business and need to get more customers, the Google 5 Star Reviews service is an excellent way to do it. This will help your business get more customers on the internet and grow its brand. Google 5-Star Reviews Service The Google reviews service is a way to get 5-star reviews from your customers. It's a very simple process and can be completed in just a few minutes, which makes it ideal for businesses that want to improve their online reputation but don't have time or money for traditional marketing techniques. Buy Google 5 Star Reviews Google Reviews Service Costs: There are three different ways you can use this service: You can pay $3 per review submitted through the Google site; You can pay $10 per month (or $99 annually), which includes an integrated email address where they will send out all customer emails sent by you; Or you can pay $25 per month (or $250 annually), which includes access to all other features of our platform as well as automated scheduling capabilities so that we know when exactly each company should post its latest review! Can you pay for 5 star google reviews? Yes, you can buy Google 5 Star Reviews. You can pay for verified Google 5 Star Reviews and reviews from people that have been working in the service industry for years. You can get a lot of information about a business or individual on Google by searching their name or title and seeing what comes up in the search results. If this person has written reviews on Google then they are probably telling you the truth about their experience with that company or individual. Buy Google 5 Star Reviews We're not just talking about content either-we mean real time human interaction that actually takes place between two living, breathing humans who happen to be talking face-to-face right now! Why should you buy google 5 star reviews from online? We are the best platform for you to get your business listed in Google. We have an exper
elliswhite5

Buy SiteJabber Reviews - 100% Non-Drop,Safe, Permanent, Cheap ... - 0 views

  •  
    Buy Sitejabber Reviews Introduction Sitejabber is a social media monitoring tool that allows you to track your competitors' and customers' activity. You can use it to find out who is talking about you, what they're saying and how many people are viewing your site. What is SiteJabber ? Sitejabber is a website that allows users to post reviews of businesses. It's a review site where users can write reviews of businesses and share their opinions with others in an easy-to-use format. Sitejabber was founded by two brothers, John and Mike MacDonough, in 1999 as an email marketing company called Sidekick Technologies Inc., which was later renamed SiteJabber Incorporated (SJI). The company grew quickly due to its focus on providing email services for small businesses through its flagship product "Sitescope." How Sitejabber Works? Sitejabber is a social media site that allows users to review businesses. It's similar to Yelp or Facebook in that it allows you to leave reviews about local businesses, but there are some key differences between Sitejabber and these other sites. Here's what you need to know about this new social network: Why choose us to Buy SiteJabber Reviews? Why choose us to Buy SiteJabber Reviews? We are the best to buy SiteJabber Reviews. We have over 10 years of experience in this field, and we know what it takes to sell high-quality reviews on your site. Our customer service team is available 24/7, so if you have any questions or concerns about your order, please don't hesitate to contact us! Also, our prices are unbeatable! You can buy as many reviews as you want at one time with our discount pricing system so there's no excuse not to try out our service today!
  •  
    Buy Sitejabber Reviews Introduction Sitejabber is a social media monitoring tool that allows you to track your competitors' and customers' activity. You can use it to find out who is talking about you, what they're saying and how many people are viewing your site. What is SiteJabber ? Sitejabber is a website that allows users to post reviews of businesses. It's a review site where users can write reviews of businesses and share their opinions with others in an easy-to-use format. Sitejabber was founded by two brothers, John and Mike MacDonough, in 1999 as an email marketing company called Sidekick Technologies Inc., which was later renamed SiteJabber Incorporated (SJI). The company grew quickly due to its focus on providing email services for small businesses through its flagship product "Sitescope." How Sitejabber Works? Sitejabber is a social media site that allows users to review businesses. It's similar to Yelp or Facebook in that it allows you to leave reviews about local businesses, but there are some key differences between Sitejabber and these other sites. Here's what you need to know about this new social network: Why choose us to Buy SiteJabber Reviews? Why choose us to Buy SiteJabber Reviews? We are the best to buy SiteJabber Reviews. We have over 10 years of experience in this field, and we know what it takes to sell high-quality reviews on your site. Our customer service team is available 24/7, so if you have any questions or concerns about your order, please don't hesitate to contact us! Also, our prices are unbeatable! You can buy as many reviews as you want at one time with our discount pricing system so there's no excuse not to try out our service today! Buy Sitejabber Reviews Sitejabber Reviews Buy 5 Star SiteJabber Reviews SiteJabber is a review site for local businesses. It allows customers to leave reviews about their experiences with local businesses, and it has an overall rating system similar to Yelp or TripAdvisor. Si
  •  
    Buy Sitejabber Reviews Introduction Sitejabber is a social media monitoring tool that allows you to track your competitors' and customers' activity. You can use it to find out who is talking about you, what they're saying and how many people are viewing your site. What is SiteJabber ? Sitejabber is a website that allows users to post reviews of businesses. It's a review site where users can write reviews of businesses and share their opinions with others in an easy-to-use format. Sitejabber was founded by two brothers, John and Mike MacDonough, in 1999 as an email marketing company called Sidekick Technologies Inc., which was later renamed SiteJabber Incorporated (SJI). The company grew quickly due to its focus on providing email services for small businesses through its flagship product "Sitescope." How Sitejabber Works? Sitejabber is a social media site that allows users to review businesses. It's similar to Yelp or Facebook in that it allows you to leave reviews about local businesses, but there are some key differences between Sitejabber and these other sites. Here's what you need to know about this new social network: Why choose us to Buy SiteJabber Reviews? Why choose us to Buy SiteJabber Reviews? We are the best to buy SiteJabber Reviews. We have over 10 years of experience in this field, and we know what it takes to sell high-quality reviews on your site. Our customer service team is available 24/7, so if you have any questions or concerns about your order, please don't hesitate to contact us! Also, our prices are unbeatable! You can buy as many reviews as you want at one time with our discount pricing system so there's no excuse not to try out our service today! Buy Sitejabber Reviews Sitejabber Reviews Buy 5 Star SiteJabber Reviews SiteJabber is a review site for local businesses. It allows customers to leave reviews about their experiences with local businesses, and it has an overall rating system similar to Yelp or TripAdvisor. Si
My Kingdom Books

Personalised 3D Animated Fairytale Story Book | My Kingdom Books - 0 views

  •  
    My Kingdom Book is the perfect birthday gift or Christmas present. The book on it's own is a great keepsake for newborns and the App is ideal for children aged between 2 - 8 years old.
Jackie McAnlis

Serif vs Sans: The Final Battle | Visual.ly - 0 views

  •  
    Here's a neat infographic that explains the differences between serif and sans serif fonts. You'll learn when to use one over the other as well as
Victorious Kidss Educares Pune

Leading High School in Pune - 0 views

  •  
    The Middle Year Programme : High School in Pune is for pupils aged 11 to 16, provides a framework of academic challenge that encourages students to embrace and understand the connections between traditional subjects and the real world, and to become critical and reflective thinkers. To know more about this programme visit our website @ http://www.victoriouskidsseducares.org/middle-years-programme.html
Clif Mims

Giving Anonymously - 10 views

  •  
    "A non-profit organization facilitating generosity between people."
jodi tompkins

cooperative - collaborative definition - 12 views

  •  
    Difference between cooperative learning and collaboration.
Clif Mims

Campaign Trail Collaboration - 2 views

  •  
    Mock Presidential debate between classes in Kansas and Connecticut via Skype.
David Wetzel

To Blog or Not To Blog in Science or Math Class - 0 views

  •  
    The primary purpose of blog is to facilitate interaction between a teacher and his or her students. This is possible because a blog is a dynamic tool which can be easily updated or transformed as necessary to meet the needs of a science or math class. The integration of blog technology in a class requires an investment of time. Because of this commitment, additional evidence is needed to support the integration this technology in a science or math class curriculum.
Barbara Lindsey

Minds on Fire: Open Education, the Long Tail, and Learning 2.0 (EDUCAUSE Review) | EDUCAUSE CONNECT - 1 views

  • But at the same time that the world has become flatter, it has also become “spikier”: the places that are globally competitive are those that have robust local ecosystems of resources supporting innovation and productiveness.2
  • various initiatives launched over the past few years have created a series of building blocks that could provide the means for transforming the ways in which we provide education and support learning. Much of this activity has been enabled and inspired by the growth and evolution of the Internet, which has created a global “platform” that has vastly expanded access to all sorts of resources, including formal and informal educational materials. The Internet has also fostered a new culture of sharing, one in which content is freely contributed and distributed with few restrictions or costs.
  • the most visible impact of the Internet on education to date has been the Open Educational Resources (OER) movement, which has provided free access to a wide range of courses and other educational materials to anyone who wants to use them. The movement began in 2001 when the William and Flora Hewlett and the Andrew W. Mellon foundations jointly funded MIT’s OpenCourseWare (OCW) initiative, which today provides open access to undergraduate- and graduate-level materials and modules from more than 1,700 courses (covering virtually all of MIT’s curriculum). MIT’s initiative has inspired hundreds of other colleges and universities in the United States and abroad to join the movement and contribute their own open educational resources.4 The Internet has also been used to provide students with direct access to high-quality (and therefore scarce and expensive) tools like telescopes, scanning electron microscopes, and supercomputer simulation models, allowing students to engage personally in research.
  • ...29 more annotations...
  • most profound impact of the Internet, an impact that has yet to be fully realized, is its ability to support and expand the various aspects of social learning. What do we mean by “social learning”? Perhaps the simplest way to explain this concept is to note that social learning is based on the premise that our understanding of content is socially constructed through conversations about that content and through grounded interactions, especially with others, around problems or actions. The focus is not so much on what we are learning but on how we are learning.5
  • This perspective shifts the focus of our attention from the content of a subject to the learning activities and human interactions around which that content is situated. This perspective also helps to explain the effectiveness of study groups. Students in these groups can ask questions to clarify areas of uncertainty or confusion, can improve their grasp of the material by hearing the answers to questions from fellow students, and perhaps most powerfully, can take on the role of teacher to help other group members benefit from their understanding (one of the best ways to learn something is, after all, to teach it to others).
  • This encourages the practice of what John Dewey called “productive inquiry”—that is, the process of seeking the knowledge when it is needed in order to carry out a particular situated task.
  • ecoming a trusted contributor to Wikipedia involves a process of legitimate peripheral participation that is similar to the process in open source software communities. Any reader can modify the text of an entry or contribute new entries. But only more experienced and more trusted individuals are invited to become “administrators” who have access to higher-level editing tools.8
  • by clicking on tabs that appear on every page, a user can easily review the history of any article as well as contributors’ ongoing discussion of and sometimes fierce debates around its content, which offer useful insights into the practices and standards of the community that is responsible for creating that entry in Wikipedia. (In some cases, Wikipedia articles start with initial contributions by passionate amateurs, followed by contributions from professional scholars/researchers who weigh in on the “final” versions. Here is where the contested part of the material becomes most usefully evident.) In this open environment, both the content and the process by which it is created are equally visible, thereby enabling a new kind of critical reading—almost a new form of literacy—that invites the reader to join in the consideration of what information is reliable and/or important.
  • Mastering a field of knowledge involves not only “learning about” the subject matter but also “learning to be” a full participant in the field. This involves acquiring the practices and the norms of established practitioners in that field or acculturating into a community of practice.
  • But viewing learning as the process of joining a community of practice reverses this pattern and allows new students to engage in “learning to be” even as they are mastering the content of a field.
  • Another interesting experiment in Second Life was the Harvard Law School and Harvard Extension School fall 2006 course called “CyberOne: Law in the Court of Public Opinion.” The course was offered at three levels of participation. First, students enrolled in Harvard Law School were able to attend the class in person. Second, non–law school students could enroll in the class through the Harvard Extension School and could attend lectures, participate in discussions, and interact with faculty members during their office hours within Second Life. And at the third level, any participant in Second Life could review the lectures and other course materials online at no cost. This experiment suggests one way that the social life of Internet-based virtual education can coexist with and extend traditional education.
  • Digital StudyHall (DSH), which is designed to improve education for students in schools in rural areas and urban slums in India. The project is described by its developers as “the educational equivalent of Netflix + YouTube + Kazaa.”11 Lectures from model teachers are recorded on video and are then physically distributed via DVD to schools that typically lack well-trained instructors (as well as Internet connections). While the lectures are being played on a monitor (which is often powered by a battery, since many participating schools also lack reliable electricity), a “mediator,” who could be a local teacher or simply a bright student, periodically pauses the video and encourages engagement among the students by asking questions or initiating discussions about the material they are watching.
  • John King, the associate provost of the University of Michigan
  • For the past few years, he points out, incoming students have been bringing along their online social networks, allowing them to stay in touch with their old friends and former classmates through tools like SMS, IM, Facebook, and MySpace. Through these continuing connections, the University of Michigan students can extend the discussions, debates, bull sessions, and study groups that naturally arise on campus to include their broader networks. Even though these extended connections were not developed to serve educational purposes, they amplify the impact that the university is having while also benefiting students on campus.14 If King is right, it makes sense for colleges and universities to consider how they can leverage these new connections through the variety of social software platforms that are being established for other reasons.
  • The project’s website includes reports of how students, under the guidance of professional astronomers, are using the Faulkes telescopes to make small but meaningful contributions to astronomy.
  • “This is not education in which people come in and lecture in a classroom. We’re helping students work with real data.”16
  • HOU invites students to request observations from professional observatories and provides them with image-processing software to visualize and analyze their data, encouraging interaction between the students and scientists
  • The site is intended to serve as “an open forum for worldwide discussions on the Decameron and related topics.” Both scholars and students are invited to submit their own contributions as well as to access the existing resources on the site. The site serves as an apprenticeship platform for students by allowing them to observe how scholars in the field argue with each other and also to publish their own contributions, which can be relatively small—an example of the “legitimate peripheral participation” that is characteristic of open source communities. This allows students to “learn to be,” in this instance by participating in the kind of rigorous argumentation that is generated around a particular form of deep scholarship. A community like this, in which students can acculturate into a particular scholarly practice, can be seen as a virtual “spike”: a highly specialized site that can serve as a global resource for its field.
  • I posted a list of links to all the student blogs and mentioned the list on my own blog. I also encouraged the students to start reading one another's writing. The difference in the writing that next week was startling. Each student wrote significantly more than they had previously. Each piece was more thoughtful. Students commented on each other's writing and interlinked their pieces to show related or contradicting thoughts. Then one of the student assignments was commented on and linked to from a very prominent blogger. Many people read the student blogs and subscribed to some of them. When these outside comments showed up, indicating that the students really were plugging into the international community's discourse, the quality of the writing improved again. The power of peer review had been brought to bear on the assignments.17
  • for any topic that a student is passionate about, there is likely to be an online niche community of practice of others who share that passion.
  • Finding and joining a community that ignites a student’s passion can set the stage for the student to acquire both deep knowledge about a subject (“learning about”) and the ability to participate in the practice of a field through productive inquiry and peer-based learning (“learning to be”). These communities are harbingers of the emergence of a new form of technology-enhanced learning—Learning 2.0—which goes beyond providing free access to traditional course materials and educational tools and creates a participatory architecture for supporting communities of learners.
  • We need to construct shared, distributed, reflective practicums in which experiences are collected, vetted, clustered, commented on, and tried out in new contexts.
  • An example of such a practicum is the online Teaching and Learning Commons (http://commons.carnegiefoundation.org/) launched earlier this year by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching
  • The Commons is an open forum where instructors at all levels (and from around the world) can post their own examples and can participate in an ongoing conversation about effective teaching practices, as a means of supporting a process of “creating/using/re-mixing (or creating/sharing/using).”20
  • The original World Wide Web—the “Web 1.0” that emerged in the mid-1990s—vastly expanded access to information. The Open Educational Resources movement is an example of the impact that the Web 1.0 has had on education.
  • But the Web 2.0, which has emerged in just the past few years, is sparking an even more far-reaching revolution. Tools such as blogs, wikis, social networks, tagging systems, mashups, and content-sharing sites are examples of a new user-centric information infrastructure that emphasizes participation (e.g., creating, re-mixing) over presentation, that encourages focused conversation and short briefs (often written in a less technical, public vernacular) rather than traditional publication, and that facilitates innovative explorations, experimentations, and purposeful tinkerings that often form the basis of a situated understanding emerging from action, not passivity.
  • In the twentieth century, the dominant approach to education focused on helping students to build stocks of knowledge and cognitive skills that could be deployed later in appropriate situations. This approach to education worked well in a relatively stable, slowly changing world in which careers typically lasted a lifetime. But the twenty-first century is quite different.
  • We now need a new approach to learning—one characterized by a demand-pull rather than the traditional supply-push mode of building up an inventory of knowledge in students’ heads. Demand-pull learning shifts the focus to enabling participation in flows of action, where the focus is both on “learning to be” through enculturation into a practice as well as on collateral learning.
  • The demand-pull approach is based on providing students with access to rich (sometimes virtual) learning communities built around a practice. It is passion-based learning, motivated by the student either wanting to become a member of a particular community of practice or just wanting to learn about, make, or perform something. Often the learning that transpires is informal rather than formally conducted in a structured setting. Learning occurs in part through a form of reflective practicum, but in this case the reflection comes from being embedded in a community of practice that may be supported by both a physical and a virtual presence and by collaboration between newcomers and professional practitioners/scholars.
  • The building blocks provided by the OER movement, along with e-Science and e-Humanities and the resources of the Web 2.0, are creating the conditions for the emergence of new kinds of open participatory learning ecosystems23 that will support active, passion-based learning: Learning 2.0.
  • As a graduate student at UC-Berkeley in the late 1970s, Treisman worked on the poor performance of African-Americans and Latinos in undergraduate calculus classes. He discovered the problem was not these students’ lack of motivation or inadequate preparation but rather their approach to studying. In contrast to Asian students, who, Treisman found, naturally formed “academic communities” in which they studied and learned together, African-Americans tended to separate their academic and social lives and studied completely on their own. Treisman developed a program that engaged these students in workshop-style study groups in which they collaborated on solving particularly challenging calculus problems. The program was so successful that it was adopted by many other colleges. See Uri Treisman, “Studying Students Studying Calculus: A Look at the Lives of Minority Mathematics Students in College,” College Mathematics Journal, vol. 23, no. 5 (November 1992), pp. 362–72, http://math.sfsu.edu/hsu/workshops/treisman.html.
  • In the early 1970s, Stanford University Professor James Gibbons developed a similar technique, which he called Tutored Videotape Instruction (TVI). Like DSH, TVI was based on showing recorded classroom lectures to groups of students, accompanied by a “tutor” whose job was to stop the tape periodically and ask questions. Evaluations of TVI showed that students’ learning from TVI was as good as or better than in-classroom learning and that the weakest students academically learned more from participating in TVI instruction than from attending lectures in person. See J. F. Gibbons, W. R. Kincheloe, and S. K. Down, “Tutored Video-tape Instruction: A New Use of Electronics Media in Education,” Science, vol. 195 (1977), pp. 1136–49.
 Lisa Durff

K12 Online Conference 2008 | Professional Learning Networks "Online Professional Development" - 1 views

  •  
    Jeff Utecht's presentation for k12online about the online learning. Also he discusses the difference between communities and networks.
avivajazz  jazzaviva

Twitter Maps for Social Network Analysis | InFlow - 0 views

  •  
    When choosing a map - especially a social network map - which do you prefer - pretty or useful? In an ideal world I would take pretty useful, but forced to choose between the two I'll take useful. Here are two social graphs taken from my Twitter following data. -Valdis Krebs, InFlow, Social Network Analysis Expert
Hanna Wiszniewska

TechWag » Social Networking in Education - 0 views

  •  
    Social networking in education is a flattener, this breaks down barriers that would otherwise exist between the student, the program and the instructors. This also makes information on demand as long as there is a good way to find that information that students will work with and use. Reliance on the old static school room or black board computer system is not necessarily the way that things are going. Education 2.0 should be breaking down these barriers, and it is great to work for a school that is doing this, because it is all about how people learn, and if people learn, then we are doing our job.
Rhondda Powling

Roman Numerals - 2 views

  •  
    The big differences between Roman and Arabic numerals (the ones we use today) are that Romans didn't have a symbol for zero, and that numeral placement within a number can sometimes indicate subtraction rather than addition.
Michael Johnson

Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age - 12 views

  •  
    Key Principles: Learning and knowledge rests in diversity of opinions. Learning is a process of connecting specialized nodes or information sources. Learning may reside in non-human appliances. Capacity to know more is more critical than what is currently known Nurturing and maintaining connections is needed to facilitate continual learning. Ability to see connections between fields, ideas, and concepts is a core skill. Currency (accurate, up-to-date knowledge) is the intent of all connectivist learning activities. Decision-making is itself a learning process. Choosing what to learn and the meaning of incoming information is seen through the lens of a shifting reality. While there is a right answer now, it may be wrong tomorrow due to alterations in the information climate affecting the decision.
1 - 20 of 69 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page