http://www.mathjax.org/ is "a Javascript library to display math (sic) on web pages". This interview gives you a good sense of MathJax's origins and purpose.

Interesting angle on "the order in which learners should do things" that has a strong resonance with Dave Pratt's introduction at the kick-off meeting in July. "Students are better prepared to understand and appreciate the elegance of a theory or a principle when exploring the domain by themselves first."

New employees too infrequently "possess habits of discipline, ready obedience, self-help, and pride in good work for its own sake". Thus a 1906 Board of Education report. So "for as long as we have evidence, employers have been critical of the ability of the education system to provide the workers they need." Concluding para: ".... the world's most efficient and effective education systems, from Finland to Singapore, have some strikingly common characteristics: they are unremitting in their focus on the core skills of literacy and numeracy, but they set those skills in the wider context of developing higher-order complex thinking. Most of all, they take equality seriously: they focus, in a way which education systems historically did not, on ensuring that all - not just a privileged few - develop the higher-order skills needed to use and analyse information, and that they have access to rewarding higher-level training. Put at its crudest, conventional subjects still matter, but they need to be taught and learnt in innovative ways."

Personal and current piece by Audrey Watters who has just visited Seymour Papert. Introductory excerpt: "In most contemporary educational situations where children come into contact with computers the computer is used to put children through their paces, to provide exercises of an appropriate level of difficulty, to provide feedback, and to dispense information. The computer programming the child."

About 15 years ago David Wiley sort of invented Open Content and laid the foundations for Creative Commons. This post is worth reading. Concluding para, but don't ignore the one that precedes it:: "MOOCs provide an extremely rare opportunity to completely rethink pedagogy, from the ground up, for a completely new context and configuration. However, until someone gets serious about this line of thinking and looks for legitimate inspiration outside of classroom-based pedagogies-for-30, it's going to be hard times."

Two interesting posts by Dan Meyer (separated by 18 8 months) that make points we'd do well to take account of. The second is this: http://blog.mrmeyer.com/?p=17564

Plenty of references to MOOCs and to Educational Technology in the BIS International Education Strategy, launched today by Vince Cable and David Willetts at Pearson's HQ in London. (I was there.)

Interesting piece by Keith Devlin about instructional videos and the research evidence showing that they tend to reinforce preconceptions even if the learner's preconceptions are completely at variance with the instructional content.

A concentrated 2 page summary from Educause. Possibly a bit think on Mozilla's Open Badges system.

Designed for use in the US (mapped against the Common Core State Standards, which groups things into six concept areas: Number and Quantity, Algebra, Functions, Modeling, Geometry, and Statistics and Probability), and designed to cover the equivalent of a year-long, traditional school curriculum. Worth poking about in. Comments from IOE and OCR particularly welcome.

The comments to this article are (mainly) more interesting than the article itself which is sort of "boilerplate": disruption is coming, first mover advantage matters, business models are thin on the ground.

This strikes me as a good example of the opposite approach to that which we'll be taking.

A big, somewhat breathless, piece in the Scientific American about adaptive learning.

Article in Nature by Sarah Kellogg with a lightweight overview of building a Coursera MOOC

Udacity's partnership with San Jose State University seems to be on the rocks.

I blushed reading this........

"But as Gates's higher-education activism grows, so does anxiety over the consequences." Worth us being properly aware of issues associated with how charitable money is beginning to be viewed in HE in the US. The discussion of the piece is interesting, in that there are some strong counters to the line advanced in the article.

Rather breathless interview with the "brains" behind adaptive learning company Knewton (sic). Jim may well have comments on this.

Results from the Adult Literacy and Life Skills Survey conducted by the Australian Bureau of Statistics have been used to suggest there is a crisis in the literacy and numeracy skills of Australian adults. This study challenges this current view by looking at the issue from a worker's perspective. Production workers, together with their managers and trainers, from three manufacturing companies were interviewed and observed. Little evidence of a direct link between increasing literacy and numeracy skills of workers and improved productivity was found.

This Audrey Watters piece putting the boot into learning analytics, predictive modelling, and adaptive learning shows that our project is on quite highly contested ground.