Skip to main content

Home/ Christianity and Science/ Group items tagged Theistic Evolution

Rss Feed Group items tagged

J. B.

AlbertMohler.com - The Predicament - Francis Collins, Human Embryos, Evolution, and the... - 0 views

  • Harvard’s Steven Pinker declared that Collins is “an advocate of profoundly anti-scientific beliefs.” Other leading scientists said far worse. Why? As The New Yorker reports this week, Dr. Collins is “a believing Christian.” As writer Peter J. Boyer explains, “The objection to Collins was his faith—or, at least, the ardency of it.
  • Even with all of Francis Collins’ achievements, qualifications, and experience, the bare fact that he is a “believing Christian” is enough to draw the active opposition of many in the scientific establishment. Just being a “believing Christian” is reason enough for suspicion, condescension, and opposition from many. Even when Francis Collins presses his case for evolution, he is dismissed by many scientists simply because he believes in God. In other words, when we are told that we have to accept and embrace the theory of evolution in order to escape being considered intellectually backward, remember the opposition to Francis Collins. It just doesn’t work. When Collins’ elevation to the NIH post was announced, evolutionary scientist P. Z. Myers lamented, “I don’t want American science to be represented by a clown.” This is the predicament of those who argue that evangelicals must accept some form of theistic evolution — the guardians of evolution still consider them clowns.
  •  
    Some evidence that Theistic Evolutionists won't gain much respect with their attempt at a mediating position in the scientific community. (Or at least they'll have to be willing to capitulate some more of their religious metaphysic first.)
J. B.

Confrontation all the way : Pharyngula - 0 views

  • the great unifying principle of my discipline
  • wallowing in self-inflicted ignorance
  • weird fantasies
  • ...10 more annotations...
  • religious zealots who have been poisoning the minds of the young
  • Gnu Atheists are so dang angry. Damned right we are. The real question is why everyone else isn't.
  • Idiot America
  • The sea our country is drowning in is a raging religiosity, wave after wave of ignorant arguments and ideological absurdities pushed by tired dogma and fervent and frustrated fanatics.
  • The solution, the only longterm solution, is the sanity of secularism.
  • pseudoscientific BS like intelligent design
  • disease
  • if you're one of those people trying to defend superstition and quivering in fear at the idea of taking on a majority that believes in foolishness, urging us to continue slapping bandages on the blight of faith, well then, you're part of the problem and we'll probably do something utterly dreadful, like be rude to you or write some cutting sarcastic essay to mock your position. That is our métier, after all.
  • the Gnu Atheists have values, too, and premiere among them is truth. And that makes us uncivil and rude, because we challenge the truth of religion.
  • Evolution is a real, and it is a process built on raw chance driven by the brutal engines of selection, and there is no sign of a loving, personal god, but only billions of years of pitiless winnowing without any direction other than short-term survival and reproduction. It's not pretty, it's not consoling, it doesn't sanctify virginity, or tell you that god really loves your foreskin, but it's got one soaring virtue that trumps all the others: it's true.
  •  
    Atheist PZ Myers defends his anger toward religious people and has an interesting statement on what he believes the implications of Darwinism are (for those who consider themselves "Theistic Evolutionists").
J. B.

False Start? The Controversy Over Adam and Eve Heats Up - 0 views

  • As Hagerty reported: “Schneider, who taught theology at Calvin College in Michigan until recently, says it’s time to face facts: There was no Adam and Eve, no serpent, no apple, no fall that toppled man from a state of innocence.”
  • “Evolution makes it pretty clear that in nature, and in the moral experience of human beings, there never was any such paradise to be lost. So Christians, I think, have a challenge, have a job on their hands to reformulate some of their tradition about human beginnings”
  • They argue that science is unable to resolve the question of Adam and Eve as a whole, but they write: “All science can say is that there was never a time when only two people existed on the earth: it is silent on whether or not God began a special relationship with a historical couple at some point in the past.”
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • Later, they argue that “the most [science] can say is that there were never just two individuals who were the sole genetic progenitors of the entire human race.” They also claim, again, that “genetics convincingly shows that there was never a time when there were just two persons.” Ever since the challenge of Darwin and evolutionary theory appeared, some Christians have tried to argue that the opening chapters of the Bible should not be taken “literally.”
J. B.

Come and See | The BioLogos Forum - 0 views

  • Evidence of the Spirit at work is the only true measure we have of our theology; all other measures, including whether it fits our carefully-reasoned arguments of who is in and who is out, are vanity.
  •  
    Mark Sprinkle writes that "Evidence of the SPirit at work is the only true measure we have of our theology..." So much for Sola Scriptura...
J. B.

The Language of God and Adam's Genesis & Historicity in Paul's Gospel - 0 views

  •  
    Article by A. B. Caneday
1 - 6 of 6
Showing 20 items per page