Group items tagged

PG&E did not get any consideration or thought to disabled or seniors when they went ahead with their

base ball

Riverside County Homicide Coverup of Nye Frank: liability in for ...Feb 25, 2010 ... http://www.google.com/search?q=liability+in+for+failure+to+provide+requested+documents+for+statutory+duty+&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE- ... nyefrank.typepad.com/.../liability-in-for-failure-to-provide-requested-documents-for-statutory-duty---google-search-1.html - 17 hours ago - Selling and Listing Agent Liability - Untitled DocumentThis interpretation would provide buyers with all the benefits, ... and to whom the agent owed fiduciary duties) based on the agent's failure to provide ... Claims based on an agent's breach of the statutory duties of disclosure and ... www.owrlaw.com/publications/buyers.html - Cached - ERISA 502(c) Actions: Penalties For the Failure to Provide Plan ...Provide that a claimant shall be provided, upon request and free of charge, ... can be held liable for statutory penalties under 29 U.S.C. 1132(c). ... to $110 per day penalty for failure to provide documents to participant) with 502(c)(2) ... be treated as such for purposes of the liability provided under 1132(c). ... www.buchanandisability.com/helpful.../ERISA-502c-actions/ - Cached - Failure to post sign required by statute deprives - Animal Science ...773.02 shall prevent or limit the liability of an equine activity sponsor, .... of the legislative demand that they comply with their statutory duty to warn of their ... 159 In the absence of language directly stating that failure to provide the required warning notice disqualifies a person from statutory immunity, ... www.equinelawsafety.org/cases/laws/mcgraw.htm - Cached - :: ERISA Plan Information Requests: (Unit 2) "Statutory Purpose ...Nov 13, 2006 ... If any current documents do not exist at the time of a request, ... (N.D.Ga.2004) [Claim reviewers' reports] Plan administrator breached disclosure duty under ERISA ... under ERISA against plan administrator for failure to provide .... Joint venture liability theory can be applied against managing ..

Home > Criminal Appeals Law & Information > California's DNA Testing Procedures Questioned by the U.S. Supreme Court - Protect Your Sixth Amendment Rights Posted On: February 22, 2010 by Southern California Criminal Defense Attorney California's DNA Testing Procedures Questioned by the U.S. Supreme Court - Protect Your Sixth Amendment Rights In 2007, the California Supreme Court held that a DNA expert could testify about evidence from a test he or she did not perform. (People v. Geier (2007) 41 Cal.4th 555). This state has followed a long established practice where supervisors testify about lab tests, instead of technicians who actually tested forensic evidence. However, the validity of the California decision has been questioned by the 2008 United States Supreme Court's ruling, which held that a defendant had a right to demand live testimony at trial from crime lab technicians who actually performed their tests. (Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts (2008) 129 S. Ct. 2527). In particular, the Court has ruled that a trial court violated defendant's rights under the Sixth Amendment during his trial on a charge alleging that he distributed cocaine, when it admitted certificates signed by state laboratory analysts which stated that material police seized was cocaine because the certificates fell within core class of testimonial statements covered by Confrontation Clause. The Court's decision was the latest test of a defendant's Sixth Amendment right to be "confronted with the witnesses against him." The Confrontation clause was revived in 2004 when the justices rejected a prosecutor's use of an absent witness' tape-recorded statement to the police. Justice Scalia writing for the majority of the Court emphasized that when testimonial evidence is at issue, the Constitution gives the defendant a right to confront and to cross-examine the witness. (Crawfowd v. Washington (2004) 541 U.S. 36). Since then, the Supreme Court has issued opinions clarifying what qu