Morningstar determined that Janus and Putnam were the two largest "wealth destroyers" during the decade, losing $58 billion and $46 billion, respectively. "Janus and Putnam rode the growth wave more than anyone else," Kinnel says. "They had some very aggressive funds that put up big numbers that got huge inflows." After the tech bubble burst, the funds that were most heavily invested in these types of holdings experienced huge sell-offs, which made it difficult for these funds to attract inflows through the remainder of the decade.
According to Morningstar, American Funds created about $191 million in wealth for investors during the decade, followed by Vanguard and Fidelity. Since American Funds generally employs a more value-oriented strategy, the firm was largely able to avert the first bear market of the decade. "The 2000 to 2002 bear market was all growth and tech, and American barely touched that, whereas they had lots of value, dividend payers, and bonds, which did very well," Kinnel says.
Recently, the tables have turned for American. In 2009, it lost the most of any fund family (more than $25 billion). No fund family, including American, was able to avoid the bear market of 2008. The same strategy that allowed American to bypass most of the first bear market failed because many well-known dividend-paying companies, like big financial firms, experienced huge losses.
1More
How is capital gains tax calculated? - 0 views
1More
What is Dividend Tax & How to calculate dividend tax in UK? - 0 views
1More
How Does A fha reverse mortgage calculator - 0 views
1More
How to claim constructive dismissal? - 0 views
1More
Dividends: U.S. Deeper in Recessionary Territory - Political Calculations - Townhall Fi... - 0 views
1More
What is the User Acquisition Calculation Methodology Adopted by Reliance Jio ? - 0 views
1More
Save money through a loan comparison - 0 views
‹ Previous
21 - 40 of 90
Next ›
Last »
Showing 20▼ items per page