Skip to main content

Home/ International Business and Trade Group/ Group items tagged bilateral

Rss Feed Group items tagged

thenationbuzz

INDIA IS IN TALK WITH FRANCE, US AND GERMANY! | The Nation Buzz - 0 views

  •  
    India is in talks with France, the US, and Germany for the continuation of international flights, civil aviation minister said. Through Bilateral air bubbles, India and other countries will resume flights with some major conditions of COVID19. The aviation minister said that from march since the coronavirus outbreak the international flights are shut down due to lockdown in the countries.
tradersdata

Indian Trade Data- Trade Statistics Report for Traders - Seairexim Export Import Data - 0 views

  •  
    Indian trade data revealed that China overtook the US to become the largest trade partner in 2020. The bilateral trade between India and China was 77.7 billion USD. Imports from China were 58.7 billion USD and exports were 19 billion USD.
Leonardo Gottems

Investment in oil-rich countries: case of Algeria, by Fidan Aliyeva - 0 views

  •  
    Algeria is holding 8th place as world's largest producer of natural gas reserves and 3rd largest supplier to Europe. It is the third largest holder of oil proven reserves in Africa as of January 2012, behind Libya and Nigeria, and second largest holder of natural gas proven reserves after Nigeria. (Oil and Gas Journal). Algeria is a member of Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). The country's hydrocarbons sector accounted for 60% of its budget revenues, 36% of its GDP and over 97% of its export earning in 2010 (US State Department). (US Energy Information Administration).
Skeptical Debunker

Gary Gensler's Conversion to Financial Reformer - NYTimes.com - 0 views

  • Today, he is emerging as one of the nation’s archreformers, pushing to impose some of the most stringent new financial regulations in history. And as the head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the leading contender to oversee the complex derivatives contracts that played a central role in the financial crisis and, in turn, the Great Recession, he is in a position to influence the outcome. It may seem an unlikely conversion, but it is one that has won the approval of Brooksley E. Born, of all people, a former outspoken head of the commission. She sounded alarms more than a decade ago about the dangers hiding in the poorly understood derivatives market and was silenced by the same Washington power brokers that counted Mr. Gensler as a member. Mr. Gensler opposed Ms. Born, according to people who worked at the commission in the 1990s, and in 2000 played a significant role in shepherding through Congress deregulation measures that led to explosive growth of the over-the-counter derivatives market. That was then. These days, Ms. Born is convinced of Mr. Gensler’s reformist zeal, as he takes on Wall Street in what is becoming one of the fiercest battles over regulation in the postcrisis era. “I think he is doing very well,” she said in an interview. “He certainly seems to be committed to robust oversight of derivatives and limiting excessive speculation and leverage.” The proposals championed by Mr. Gensler, if adopted by Congress, would substantially alter what is now a largely unregulated market in over-the-counter derivatives, financial instruments used by companies and investors to protect themselves and bet on moves in variables, like interest rates or currencies, and to speculate. The proposals include forcing the big banks that sell derivatives to conduct their trades in the open on public exchanges and clear them through central clearinghouses, so that any investor can see the prices that dealers charge their customers. Today, those transactions are bilateral and private.
  •  
    For 18 years, Gary G. Gensler worked on Wall Street, striking merger deals at the venerable Goldman Sachs. Then in the late 1990s, he moved to the Treasury Department, joining a Washington establishment that celebrated the power of markets and fought off regulation at almost every turn.
  •  
    Maybe he has "SEEN THE LIGHT" (had an almost "religious" conversion to the benefits of regulation). Then again, maybe his old employer (Goldman Sachs) - having become the "biggest and baddest" in the regulation-less free-for-all (including getting bailout funds through AIG for credit-default-swap "insurance" on derivatives) - wants to "cement" their position with regulation preventing any other party from doing what they did (and he is willing to help them in that regard)!?
  •  
    Maybe he has "SEEN THE LIGHT" (had an almost "religious" conversion to the benefits of regulation). Then again, maybe his old employer (Goldman Sachs) - having become the "biggest and baddest" in the regulation-less free-for-all (including getting bailout funds through AIG for credit-default-swap "insurance" on derivatives) - wants to "cement" their position with regulation preventing any other party from doing what they did (and he is willing to help them in that regard)!?
1 - 4 of 4
Showing 20 items per page