Biomet Hip Lawyer

Its quite frustrating that despite the number of adverse cases brought about by these infamous metal-on-metal hip implants, it is still widely used and sold in the market. Some manufacturers would say that there are no clear proofs and evidences that would point out their products as source for the injuries. Thus some research studies need thorough investigation. Maybe its just hard to release a stop order if the the product didn't harm every recipient who was injected by it. Because its a fact that although a significant number has been reported that were harmed by these metal hip implant but there's also a number of recipients that weren't harmed at all.

Lawsuits against metal-on-metal (MoM) implants specifically Biomet's M2a Magnum were accumulating within the United States state courts over the past 5 to 10 years, an online source says.

Hip replacement medical devices have been gaining popularity because of the alarming number of adverse events that were reported to the United States Food and Drug Administration, online sources reports. Biomet is among the many medical device manufacturers that are facing hundreds of lawsuits because of their metal-on-metal hip implant M2a Magnum

Because of the adverse reports the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) received from recipients of the M2a Magnum hip replacement, an increasing number of Biomet lawsuits had been filed in different courts across the United States, an online source reveals.

M2a Magnum is a metal-on-metal hip replacement by Biomet Orthopedics. It used to be the company's in-demand medical device among its line of products but has recently been receiving negative feedbacks from patients who claimed that its design was defective, causing metal toxicity and early failure.

By mid-2012, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) received more than 450 adverse event reports relating to the Biomet M2a Magnum hip replacement, and they have increased in frequency. Accompanying all these complaints are lawsuits filed by Biomet hip recipients against the manufacturer.

It has been said that Biomet's hip replacement devices have been the subject of growing safety concerns since the August 2010 recall of DePuy Orthopaedics' ASR hip resurfacing system and ASR Acetabular system. Apparently, these problems has been the agenda of the two days meeting between the agency (FDA) and the Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation devices panel, specifically to examine the safety of the metal-on-metal hip implants concerning the potentiality of these devices to expose patients to dangerous levels of metallic debris.

To date, there are reported hundreds of lawsuits that were filed against Biomet, alleging that the company has early knowledge of the defects of its design which is a claim very common to all device manufacturers which had a recall of their products for the past five years.

Hip replacement patients have filed hundreds of lawsuits against Biomet, claiming that the early knowledge of the company about the defects of their product design, which is a claim very common to all device manufacturers which had a recall of their products for the past five years.

Hip replacement patients have filed hundreds of lawsuits against Biomet, claiming that the early knowledge of the company about the defects of their product design, which is a claim very common to all device manufacturers which had a recall of their products for the past five years.A medical expert once

Biomet is one of the many medical device manufacturers which have contributed a number of new technologies into the orthopedic device industry. To date replacement devices for the hip, knee shoulders and other joints is still the number one contributor to Biomet's success. Metal on metal designs such as M2a Magnum hip implant products including Stanmore and Exceed ABT devices has been causing problems despite of Biomet's booming business.

Like any other metal on metal hip replacements, Biomet's M2a Magnum has been causing conditions such as metallosis to patients. Metallosis is a result of metal poisoning caused by metal particles that were mixed in the body's bloodstream due to two metal components that are constantly rubbing each other. It has been said that Biomet's hip replacement devices have been the subject of growing safety concerns since the August 2010 recall of DePuy Orthopaedics' ASR hip resurfacing system and ASR Acetabular system.

Biomet Metal on Metal Hip Replacement and its Disadvantages There has been an alarming growth in the number of complaints from patients who have received hip replacement surgeries because of a defective metal-on-metal hip replacement systems over that past ten years, an online source says.

Metal-on metal hip replacement systems were used to be highly recommended by surgeons and doctors to patients who are having severe hip problems because of its durability factor however most if not all hip implant manufacturers were recalling some of their metal-on-metal products due to increasing reports alleging device being defective.

Failed hip replace surgeries are accumulating over the past 10 years resulting to a growing number of complaints from its recipients, an online source says. A recent data from a review conducted by the United States Food and Drug Administration suggests that metal-on-metal hip replacement devices were associated with some 16,800 adverse event reports from years 2000 t0 2011 and 14,000 involved revision surgeries, says an online report from the newson6.com website.

The number of adverse event reports related to Biomet Magnum hip replacements has grown rapidly as lawsuits mount.