Hmmm...only issue here is that this from "Natural Health" so it seems to be more of a home-remedy type article. Thsi also deals with mood boosting rather than memory recall - just a few things to think about!
"They explore much more of their environment. In a small area when you explore more you bump against more individuals," study researcher Raquel Monclus, of Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (though the study was done at the University of California, Los Angeles), told LiveScience. "They are the ones initiating the play more often than females from female-biased litters."
Okay - so I've read that the reason females are worse with direction/maps is because they aren't allowed to explore as much when children. Is being exploratory more of a"male" trait!
The issue we will run into (and this is a large issue) is finding people for the study who are depressed. Since it is a confidential medical condition, and we would be looking for people who had been diagnosed with depression, I know there would definitely be confidentiality issues. Scientific issues as well - people would have to volunteer for the study who have depression - and when subjects aren't chosen randomly, that may have a slight effect on results as well.
Is this due to opioids or "muscle use?" How do they know?
blocking opioid receptors completely eliminated these cardio-protective effects in exercising rats, suggesting that opioids are responsible for some of the cardiac benefits of exercise.
If you were investigating this trait with fish, I wonder what "exploratory" would look like?
"Exploratory females seem to have the most to gain by choosing exploratory mates. We have shown previously that pairs of zebra finches that are both exploratory raise offspring in better condition than those that are mismatched or unexploratory. Similar patterns have been seen in other birds and fish. However, this is the first evidence that the personality of both partners plays a role in mate choice."
I am predicting the exercise will have a greater effect than the medication.
Boulé thinks that because both metformin and exercise act to lower glucose levels, the combination may have triggered a counter regulatory response by the body to prevent glucose levels dipping too much. "During exercise, glucagon concentrations increased in the blood (a hormone secreted by the pancreas that raises glucose levels) but when we combined exercise and metformin the glucagon levels were almost twice as elevated.
I never realized that I assumed this with symbiotic organisms as well. For example, I assumed that coral, being the larger organism, "controlled" the symbiotic relationship. I wonder if this is true for other symbiotic creatures, like green hydra?
Heike Bücking, a professor at South Dakota State University, and her team grew the legume Medicago truncatula with three species of mycorrhizal fungi that contribute different levels of phosphorous to the plant. Over the span of a day, the researchers saw that the most generous species received the highest levels of carbon in return, suggesting the plants somehow monitor their nutrient intake and reward their fungal partners accordingly.
n another experiment, the researchers grew carrot roots with a single fungal species, but supplemented the petri dish with different levels of phosphorous. In this case, the same balance developed: those fungi with the most phosphorous to give received the most carbon in return.
This really seems highly feasible - I can almost envision the setup right now - different dishes with different nutrient amounts available - just not sure how to measure carbon output.
This population is very vulnerable," Fontanella said. "Not only do they have to deal with poverty and other psychosocial issues, but also issues commonly associated with poverty, such as transportation limitations, single-parent households and unemployment. All this makes them even more vulnerable to receiving not just a poor quality of care, but poor access to mental health care."
That's an interesting idea - is that a current belief in psychology - "one healthy way of being?"
When the researchers exposed the children to a mildly stressful simulated telephone argument between their parents, distinct patterns of hormonal reactions emerged. Children exposed to high levels of interparental aggression at home showed different reactions to the telephone quarrel. Doves with parents who fought violently produced elevated levels of cortisol, a hormone that is thought to increase a person's sensitivity to stress. Hawks from such stressful home environments put the breaks on cortisol production, which is regarded as a marker for diminishing experiences of danger and alarm.
Wow - it is interesting to actually back up an idea that seems to be almost "common sense" with actual data. It DOES make sense that children who are placed into stressful situations more frequently would have different physiological reactions than those who are not placed into those situations.
The aim of the study led by Humpel was to study the effects of hypercholesterolemia in adult rats. Male 6 months old Sprague Dawley rats were fed with normal food (controls) or with a special 5% cholesterol-enriched diet (hypercholesterolemia). After 5 months animals were tested for behavioral impairments and pathological markers similar to those found in the brains of patients with Alzheimer's diseas
This is a potentially interesting idea - especially in a farming region. Would you find a higher rate of ADHD cases in an area where pesticide use was more prevalent?
"Previous studies have shown that exposure to some organophosphate compounds cause hyperactivity and cognitive deficits in animals,"
This is super interesting, but I wouldn't be sure about how to go about testing it. Having ADHD is a "private" medical condition - so would you have to ask for volunteers? If you do, they aren't chosen at random. Also, how do you test urine for those compounds? Could this study be recreated with mice?
This is an interesting hypothesis. I have personally wondered why I see so many students with asthma, allergies, etc. I don't have any data to support it, but it seems as if these disorders are more common than they were in the past. I never considered that antibiotics could play a role.
Helicobacter pylori, which has been the dominant ancient organism of the human stomach since time immemorial, that it is disappearing. Helicobacter is becoming extinct. This is what has got me thinking in this area, because if Helicobacter can become extinct, so can other organisms.
In Danish kids, the more courses of antibiotics they get, the more likely they are to get IBD. There are studies from Canada showing the same thing for asthma. More courses of antibiotics, more asthma.
This makes sense to me because the antibiotic would be wiping out most of the bacteria in the intestine, so I can understand how it would be more likely that they could develop an intestinal disorder. I'm not sure how this relates to asthma? Are there also "good bacteria" that reside in the lungs?
Hydra regeneration would be a potentially feasible study topic.
With a cohort of 12 animals, each an estimated 14 years old when captured, Eguchi began systematically removing the lenses from the eyes of the newts, a rapidly regenerating organ.
about 5 months—throughout all 18 repetitions of the procedure, demonstrating that there is no delay in or slowing of the process of lens regeneration over time or through repeated regeneration.
I wonder what type of bacteria they are using. Are these bacteria ones I could get to use in the lab? Where are they getting the waste water to experiment with?
I wonder if they were just fed the compound, or if they were fed it from tangerines? How much were they given? Would you get the effect from eating tangerines?
Mice became much more sensitive to the effects of insulin. Nobiletin was shown to prevent the buildup of fat in the liver by stimulating the expression of genes involved in burning excess fat, and inhibiting the genes responsible for manufacturing fat.
Some of these are contained in medicines, including cancer treatments, pharmaceutical treatments, and pesticides used in agriculture. The research suggests that when they get into the water system, these chemicals may play a pivotal role in causing feminising effects in male fish
Do these chemicals just cause these problems in vertebrates, like fish?
Would it be possible to obtain chemicals like this, and test them on an invertebrate species?
Found in some industrial chemicals and the contraceptive pill,
Birth control pills could cause this? How would that actually work? How could a birth control pill cause a male to change gender? What levels of the hormone are required to cause this gender change?