[Plaintiff's Response to Order to Show Cause] - 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LEOTA ANN FRANK, pro se
16789 Valley High Drive
Banning, CA 92220
(951) 849-1311
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Leota Ann Frank,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Daima Calhoun, Michael
Rushton or his successor,
Cecelia Placencia, Kim
Emmerling, Stanley Sniff,
John Shultz, Dan Wilhelm,
Jesse Martinez, Andre
O'Harra, Mark Fajardo, MD,
Brent Secrest, Alan
Wesergeldt, Riverside Board
of Supervisors,
Adult Protective Services,
Victim's Compensation
Board, inclusive
Defendants
))))))))))
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.:
CV10-643 PA (PJWx)
PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ORDER
OF APRIL 5, 2010
On April 5, 2010, Judge Percy Anderson issued an
Order to Shaw Cause why Plaintiff's complaint against
defendants "should not be dismissed for lack of
jurisdiction." Plaintiff submits this response and
evidence appendix (hereafter Appendix) as answer to the
show cause order as to why her complaint should not be
dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. As the scope of
the "Order to Show Cause" is specifically directed at