Group items tagged

[Plaintiff's Response to Order to Show Cause] - 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LEOTA ANN FRANK, pro se 16789 Valley High Drive Banning, CA 92220 (951) 849-1311 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Leota Ann Frank, Plaintiff, vs. Daima Calhoun, Michael Rushton or his successor, Cecelia Placencia, Kim Emmerling, Stanley Sniff, John Shultz, Dan Wilhelm, Jesse Martinez, Andre O'Harra, Mark Fajardo, MD, Brent Secrest, Alan Wesergeldt, Riverside Board of Supervisors, Adult Protective Services, Victim's Compensation Board, inclusive Defendants )))))))))) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: CV10-643 PA (PJWx) PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ORDER OF APRIL 5, 2010 On April 5, 2010, Judge Percy Anderson issued an Order to Shaw Cause why Plaintiff's complaint against defendants "should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction." Plaintiff submits this response and evidence appendix (hereafter Appendix) as answer to the show cause order as to why her complaint should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. As the scope of the "Order to Show Cause" is specifically directed at

We have now come to realize 3 Federal employees along with state employees participation. Too profitable for elder probate homicides. Only New York Times wrote about it. The public has little concern for elders and the political parties grand stand they are doing something like in our case but just a show.

Homicide Cover up of Nye Frank

This is Google's cache of http://home.earthlink.net/~malfeasance/id23.html. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on Jun 22, 2010 22:26:17 GMT. The current page could have changed in the meantime. Learn more Text-only versionThese terms only appear in links pointing to this page: http www vsb org profguides actions_jul06 dec06 html Citizens' Demand For An Investigation of Criminal Conspiracy by Beltway Attorneys and Judges Ib. Affidavit in Support of Criminal Complaint for Conspiracy Home | Letter to Congress on the Denial of the Right to Impartial Judicial Review of Misprision of a Felony | Our Purpose | Aug. 28, 2009 Letters to Preseident Obama and Gov. Kaine to Direct Response to Petition for Cert. | U.S. Supreme Court Petition for Cert. to DC Circuit to Oppose Disbarment based on VSBDB Void Order | I. Transmittal Letter to Federal Criminal Complaint Filed in the District of Columbia | Ia. D.C. CRIMINAL COMPLAINT FOR CONSPIRACY BY JUDGES, GOVERNMENT AND BELTWAY LOBBYIST/ATTORNEYS | Ib. Affidavit in Support of Criminal Complaint for Conspiracy | Ic. MEMO IN SUPPORT OF COMPLAINT TO INDICT JUDGES FOR CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY DEPRIVING FATHER OF RIGHTS | II. Transmittal Letter to Federal Criminal Complaint filed E.D. of Virgina | III. Transmittal Letter to Federal Criminal Complaint In Pennsylvania for Misprision of a Felony | IV. Transmittal Letter Federal Criminal Complaint Filed in Colorado for Obstruction of Justice. | V. TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO CRIMINAL COMPLAINT FOR JUDGES CABRANES ET AL. VIOLATING VOID ORDER DOCTRINE | Becoming a Member | Contact Us | Calendar of Events | Members Page | Newsletter | Links United States District Court District of Columbia ________________________________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. John G. Roberts, et al., ________________________________________________) AFFIDAVIT OF PROBABLE CAUSE IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT I. INTRODUCTION 1. I am a Citizen

Constitutional basis for legislation Congress derived its power to pass the Sherman Act through its constitutional authority to regulate interstate commerce. Therefore, Federal courts only have jurisdiction to apply the Act to conduct that restrains or substantially affects either interstate commerce or trade within the District of Columbia. This requires the plaintiff must show that the conduct occurred during the flow of interstate commerce or had an appreciable effect on some activity that occurs during interstate commerce. [edit] Elements A Section 1 violation has three elements:[16] An agreement which unreasonably restrains competition and which affects interstate commerce.

Nye Frank Homicide Cover up may come out now in the light and show the gross corruption in Riverside County

False Arrest The claim that is most often asserted against police is false arrest. Persons bringing this claim assert that police violated their Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable seizure. If the officer had probable cause to believe the individual had committed a crime, the arrest is reasonable and the Fourth Amendment has not been violated. Police can arrest without a warrant for a felony or misdemeanor committed in their presence. (Some states also allow warrantless arrests for misdemeanor domestic assaults not committed in the officer's presence.) Even if the information the officer relied upon later turns out to be false, the officer is not liable if he believed it was accurate at the time of the arrest. To prevail on a false arrest claim, the victim must show that the arresting officer lacked probable cause, that is, facts sufficient to cause a reasonable person to believe that a crime had been committed. http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:xsg_D3OUnnIJ:public.findlaw.com/civil-rights/more-civil-rights-topics/police-misconduct-rights.html+false+claim+against+crime+victim+constitutional+violation&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

Brian Floyd the Legislative Rep in Riverside County that Phil Reddish states helping him to cover up homicide is now going against a mandamus to enforce the law

"The uncontested facts show that Evans cannot satisfy the requirement of "affirmatively prov[ing] prejudice." It is inconceivable to us, and not merely improbable as in Henderson v. Morgan, 426 U.S. 637, 644 n. 12, 96 S.Ct. 2253, 2257 n. 12, 49 L.Ed.2d 108 (1976), that Evans would have gone to trial on a defense of intoxication, or that if he had done so he either would have been acquitted or, if convicted, would nevertheless have been given a shorter sentence than he actually received. It just is not believable that Evans did all the things he does not deny having done, involving elaborate negotiations with the police over several hours, in some sort of alcohol-induced trance. In this respect the present case resembles Morgan v. Israel, 735 F.2d 1033 (7th Cir.1984). In evaluating the voluntariness of Morgan's failure to plead not guilty we said, "It is sufficiently clear that Morgan had no hope at all of an acquittal to enable us to infer that he would not have changed his plea to not guilty .... He admitted having shot Mallason; and when you shoot a person several times, with fatal results, the inference of deliberate homicide is irresistible .... The jury never would have believed that he lacked the ... elementary mental capacity required to form a murderous intent...." Id. at 1036. So here, no jury could have believed that Evans was not acting deliberately when he did all the things he did in the police station. Therefore, being told that if he had not been acting deliberately he would have been acquitted of some of the offenses with which he was charged could not have led him to change his plea and to win acquittal."

This formal approach to the meaning of due process could obviously have limited both Congress and the state legislatures in the development of procedures unknown to English law. But when California's abandonment of indictment by grand jury was challenged, the Court refused to be limited by the fact that such proceeding was the English practice and that Coke had indicated that it was a proceeding required as "the law of the land." The meaning of the Court in Murray's Lessee was "that a process of law, which is not otherwise forbidden, must be taken to be due process of law, if it can show the sanction of settled usage both in England and in this country; but it by no means follows that nothing else can be due process of law." To hold that only historical, traditional procedures can constitute due process, the Court said, "would be to deny every quality of the law but its age, and to render it incapable[p.1348]of progress or improvement."23 Therefore, in observing the due process guarantee, it was concluded, the Court must look "not [to] particular forms of procedures, but [to] the very substance of individual rights to life, liberty, and property." The due process clause prescribed "the limits of those fundamental principles of liberty and justice which lie at the base of all our civil and political institutions. . . . It follows that any legal proceeding enforced by public authority, whether sanctioned by age and custom, or newly devised in the discretion of the legislative power, in furtherance of the general public good, which regards and preserves these principles of liberty and justice, must be held to be due process of law."24 http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:zSDVmdAbFyMJ:www.law.cornell.edu/anncon/html/amdt5bfrag2_user.html+Extending+Due+Process+to+Undisclosed+Evidence&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

Brian Floyd the District Attorney Campaine managers brother showed up in court for Ty Reddish. He works for the group that represents the DA office. Right now they have a false statement of fact in Federal Court, maybe two. Exparte meetings with the judge already. This case can shine a light on some really bad things happening in Riverside County

Lee Frank is still a stalking victim with full knowledge of the current District Attorney and Sheriff along with the Supervisors

Brief information about all kinds of latest auto, car, new car, old car, used care, green car, sports car, auto parts and accessories, car buying tips, advice, car care, car show, car events etc. It is very much helpful for everyone who handling any kinds of car or auto.

Auto-week delivers the news and information about all types of autos. It is focused on getting drivers into the right car for them. It also provides different needs that buyers are faced with when making the decision to purchase a car.

MaintenanceOfCar is bringing auto enthusiasts the latest car news from around the world. Visit this site to get up-to-date automotive news along with commentary with automobiles and auto industry. You can also find out the latest product and vehicle launches news, the pricing information and industry news with the latest announcements from the manufacturers, press release.

It is a huge online car information site where you can find the latest car news, car tuning of different models, news on hybrid cars, sports cars and much more. It is the right place if you wish to be nourished with auto news. The latest news of the auto show also covers here. You can also find here the information of the car accessories. It is a right place for the real auto enthusiast.

Constitutional basis for legislation Congress derived its power to pass the Sherman Act through its constitutional authority to regulate interstate commerce. Therefore, Federal courts only have jurisdiction to apply the Act to conduct that restrains or substantially affects either interstate commerce or trade within the District of Columbia. This requires the plaintiff must show that the conduct occurred during the flow of interstate commerce or had an appreciable effect on some activity that occurs during interstate commerce. [edit] Elements A Section 1 violation has three elements:[16] An agreement which unreasonably restrains competition and which affects interstate commerce.

One of the worst things is Nye Frank is in the International Drag Racing Hall of Fame -He will always be thought of when Riverside Drag Raceway is talked about as the Famous Feight Train Dragster still has some records. Lee Breedlove-Frank held the womans world land speed record. Instead of Riverside treating them proud they took our joy and his life.

PERHAPS SOMETHING GOOD CAN COME FROM THIS BAD. NYE FRANK NEVER GOT IN A FIGHT IT WAS A ATTACK. LEE FRANK IS STILL STALKED WITH THE SHERIFF AND DA ACTING LIKE SHE IS A GHOST. I WISH THEY WOULD FACE THE LAW LIKE THE REST OF US