http://www.diigo.com/search?what=you+tube+nye+frank+racing
Stalking by the killer and his parents against a elder and her family is ok for Riverside County Sheriff an DA.This month Rod Pacheco will do a Victims march. In 2008 he got a award for a elder crime victim advocate program that he had Federal Funding for. Elder Lee Frank was told by County DA Victim Advocate there was not a elder advocate in RiversideCounty. But Rod Pacheco got a public award for his great program for elder advocate that year.
http://www.diigo.com/search?what=you+tube+nye+frank+racing
Stalking by the killer and his parents against a elder and her family is ok for Riverside County Sheriff an DA.This month Rod Pacheco will do a Victims march. In 2008 he got a award for a elder crime victim advocate program that he had Federal Funding for. Elder Lee Frank was told by County DA Victim Advocate there was not a elder advocate in RiversideCounty. But Rod Pacheco got a public award for his great program for elder advocate that year.
Since Monroe v. Pape, supra, this Court has consistently avoided attaching any requirement of ulterior purpose or improper motive to the statement of a cause of action under 42 U.S.C.A. 1983. Cf. Nesmith v. Alford, 5 Cir. 1963, 318 F.2d 110; Pierson v. Ray, 5 Cir. 1965, 352 F.2d 213, reversed on other grounds, 386 U.S. 547, 87 S.Ct. 1213, 18 L.Ed.2d 288. Of course, when an essential element of the wrong itself under well established principles of tort law includes the demonstration of an improper motive as in malicious prosecution
We have now come to realize 3 Federal employees along with state employees participation. Too profitable for elder probate homicides. Only New York Times wrote about it. The public has little concern for elders and the political parties grand stand they are doing something like in our case but just a show.
", concluding that the Navarros failed to offer any
evidence of a County
policy or custom of treating domestic violence 911 calls differently from
non-domestic violence 911 calls, nor any
evidence of a County
policy or custom of depriving residents in minority neighborhoods of equal
police protection, nor any
evidence of the
Sheriff's deliberate or conscious indifference
to the rights
of abused women or residents in minority neighborhoods.
2
The Navarros now appeal."
Constitutional basis for legislation
Congress derived its power to pass the Sherman Act through its constitutional authority to regulate interstate commerce. Therefore, Federal courts only have jurisdiction to apply the Act to conduct that restrains or substantially affects either interstate commerce or trade within the District of Columbia. This requires the plaintiff must show that the conduct occurred during the flow of interstate commerce or had an appreciable effect on some activity that occurs during interstate commerce.
[edit] Elements
A Section 1 violation has three elements:[16]
An agreement
which unreasonably restrains competition
and which affects interstate commerce.
In our case Rod Pacheco got a public award for a program that was federally funded. We were told Riverside County did not have the service. Who did he lie to and cheat? Us or the Federal government