Group items tagged

Search Legislation Questions & Answers Member Resources Member List Become a Member! Donation Get Involved Report Abuse Research & Articles Archives Useful Sites EJC Home Elder Justice Act/Patient Safety and Abuse Prevention Act Now Law Read more... Elder Justice Bills Clear Congress, Obama to Sign into Law Read more... We are urging our member to make contact with their Representative in the House this week to ask for their support of the Senate passed Health Care Reform bill (H.R.3590) as it includes the Elder Justice Act. The Coalition sent a letter to the House leadership today urging support of H.R.3590. A vote is likely either this week or next. It is the best opportunity in the six year history of the EJA to see it become law. We hope you will help us make this happen! To look up your Representative in Congress, please CLICK HERE! Contact Your Member of Congress - Find by Zip Elder Justice Act Introduced The Elder Justice Act was introduced in the Senate on April 2nd, 2009 and the House on April 21st, 2009. S. 795, the Elder Justice Act was authored in the Senate by Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and co-authored by Senator Blanche Lincoln (D-AR) with original co-sponsors Senator Herb Kohl (D-WI) and Senator Olympia Snowe (R-ME). On the House side the EJA companion bill, H.R. 2006, was authored by Rep. Peter King (R-NY) and co-sponsored by Rep. Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) and Rep. Joe Sestak (D-PA). A section by section summary of the Elder Justice Act is available in the Legislation section. Complete text of S. 795 is available here. Goals and Activities The Elder Justice Coalition, through national and grassroots advocacy, educational briefings, media outreach, research, and information dissemination seeks to: Increase public awareness of the tragedy of elder abuse, neglect and exploitation at the local, state, and national levels. Increase awareness and support for

"The Petitioners, Lawrence E. Kennon, Mary D. Powers, and Mary L. Johnson, all three of whom are citizens of Illinois and residents of Cook County, together with Citizens Alert, the Coalition to End Police Torture and Brutality, First Defense Legal Aid, the Justice Coalition of Greater Chicago, the Cook County Bar Association, the Chicago Council of Lawyers, the Chicago Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Inc., the Campaign to End the Death Penalty, the Illinois Coalition Against the Death Penalty, the Illinois Death Penalty Moratorium Project, the National Lawyers Guild, Amnesty International, and Rainbow/PUSH Coalition, by their attorneys, Randolph N. Stone, of the Mandel Legal Aid Clinic of the University of Chicago Law School, and Locke E. Bowman, of the MacArthur Justice Center, respectfully request that this Court appoint a special prosecutor to investigate allegations of torture, perjury, obstruction of justice, conspiracy to obstruct justice, and other offenses by police officers under the command of Jon Burge at Area 2 and later Area 3 headquarters in the City of Chicago during the period from 1973 to the present."

1 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2009 CHAPTER 611A CRIME VICTIMS: RIGHTS, PROGRAMS, AGENCIES DEFINITIONS AND GENERAL PROVISIONS 611A.01 DEFINITIONS. 611A.015 SCOPE OF VICTIMS' RIGHTS. 611A.02 NOTIFICATION OF VICTIM SERVICES AND VICTIMS' RIGHTS. 611A.021 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO REQUEST WITHHOLDING OF CERTAIN PUBLIC DATA. 611A.03 PLEA AGREEMENTS; NOTIFICATION. 611A.0301 RIGHT TO SUBMIT STATEMENT AT PLEA PRESENTATION HEARING. 611A.031 VICTIM INPUT REGARDING PRETRIAL DIVERSION. 611A.0311 DOMESTIC ABUSE PROSECUTIONS PLAN AND PROCEDURES; PILOT PROGRAM. 611A.0315 VICTIM NOTIFICATION; DOMESTIC ASSAULT; CRIMINAL SEXUAL CONDUCT; HARASSMENT. 611A.032 INACTIVE. 611A.033 SPEEDY TRIAL; NOTICE OF SCHEDULE CHANGE. 611A.034 SEPARATE WAITING AREAS IN COURTHOUSE. 611A.035 CONFIDENTIALITY OF VICTIM'S ADDRESS. 611A.036 PROHIBITION AGAINST EMPLOYER RETALIATION. 611A.037 PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION; VICTIM IMPACT; NOTICE. 611A.038 RIGHT TO SUBMIT STATEMENT AT SENTENCING. 611A.0385 SENTENCING; IMPLEMENTATION OF RIGHT TO NOTICE OF OFFENDER RELEASE AND EXPUNGEMENT. 611A.039 RIGHT TO NOTICE OF FINAL DISPOSITION OF CRIMINAL CASE. 611A.0392 NOTICE TO COMMUNITY CRIME PREVENTION GROUP. 611A.0393 CRIME ALERTS; VIOLENT CRIMES; DISABLED ACCESS. 611A.0395 RIGHT TO INFORMATION REGARDING DEFENDANT'S APPEAL. 611A.04 ORDER OF RESTITUTION. 611A.045 PROCEDURE FOR ISSUING ORDER OF RESTITUTION. 611A.046 VICTIM'S RIGHT TO REQUEST PROBATION REVIEW HEARING. 611A.05 PENALTIES NO BAR TO CIVIL REMEDIES. 611A.06 RIGHT TO NOTICE OF RELEASE. ELECTRONIC MONITORING 611A.07 ELECTRONIC MONITORING TO PROTECT DOMESTIC ABUSE VICTIMS; STANDARDS. BARRING PERPETRATOR RECOVERY 611A.08 BARRING PERPETRATORS OF CRIMES FROM RECOVERING FOR INJURIES SUSTAINED DURING CRIMINAL CONDUCT. SEXUAL OFFENSES; DOMESTIC ABUSE AND VIOLENCE 611A.19 TESTING SEX OFFENDER FOR HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS. 611A.20 NOTICE OF RISK OF SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION

About GPO | Newsroom/Media | Congressional Relations | Inspector General | Careers | Contact | askGPO Home | Customers | Vendors | Libraries FDsys - GPO Access Search Government Publications Browse Government Publications About Government Publications Search on GPO Access -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Narrow Your Search Collection Congressional Record (122) Congressional Hearings (79) Congressional Bills (64) See More... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date Published 1999 (57) May (10) 27 (4) 26 (2) 19 (2) 20 (1) 18 (1) December (10) 07 (10) July (8) 29 (3) 26 (2) 21 (2) 01 (1) June (6) 14 (3) 15 (2) 16 (1) January (6) 19 (5) 06 (1) August (5) 04 (3) 05 (2) March (3) 30 (1) 25 (1) 24 (1) September (3) 24 (1) 15 (1) 14 (1) November (2) 04 (2) April (2) 29 (1) 28 (1) February (1) 24 (1) October (1) 05 (1) 2007 (53) December (29) 31 (27) 12 (1) 18 (1) September (7) 30 (4) 25 (2) 06 (1) January (4) 02 (1) 04 (1) 10 (1) 17 (1) November (3) 01 (1) 06 (1) 15 (1) May (3) 25 (1) 23 (1) 21 (1) February (2) 06 (1) 08 (1) July (2) 31 (1) 12 (1) April (1) 17 (1) March (1) 13 (1) August (1) 09 (1) 2003 (47) December (10) 31 (9) 12 (1) November (8) 25 (2) 20 (1) 18 (1) 12 (1) 04 (1) 03 (1) 01 (1) July (6) 31 (1) 21 (1) 11 (1) 10 (1) 08 (1) 01 (1) October (5) 30 (3) 21 (2) March (5) 04 (2) 19 (1) 18 (1) 06 (1) June (4) 30 (1) 12 (1) 09 (1) 04 (1) January (3) 29 (1) 15 (1) 07 (1) May (2) 22 (2) September (2) 30 (1) 03 (1) April (1) 25 (1) August (1) 21 (1) See More... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Government Author Congress (427) House of Representatives (83) Senate (78) See More... -------------------------

This formal approach to the meaning of due process could obviously have limited both Congress and the state legislatures in the development of procedures unknown to English law. But when California's abandonment of indictment by grand jury was challenged, the Court refused to be limited by the fact that such proceeding was the English practice and that Coke had indicated that it was a proceeding required as "the law of the land." The meaning of the Court in Murray's Lessee was "that a process of law, which is not otherwise forbidden, must be taken to be due process of law, if it can show the sanction of settled usage both in England and in this country; but it by no means follows that nothing else can be due process of law." To hold that only historical, traditional procedures can constitute due process, the Court said, "would be to deny every quality of the law but its age, and to render it incapable[p.1348]of progress or improvement."23 Therefore, in observing the due process guarantee, it was concluded, the Court must look "not [to] particular forms of procedures, but [to] the very substance of individual rights to life, liberty, and property." The due process clause prescribed "the limits of those fundamental principles of liberty and justice which lie at the base of all our civil and political institutions. . . . It follows that any legal proceeding enforced by public authority, whether sanctioned by age and custom, or newly devised in the discretion of the legislative power, in furtherance of the general public good, which regards and preserves these principles of liberty and justice, must be held to be due process of law."24 http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:zSDVmdAbFyMJ:www.law.cornell.edu/anncon/html/amdt5bfrag2_user.html+Extending+Due+Process+to+Undisclosed+Evidence&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

This is Google's cache of http://home.earthlink.net/~malfeasance/id23.html. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on Jun 22, 2010 22:26:17 GMT. The current page could have changed in the meantime. Learn more Text-only versionThese terms only appear in links pointing to this page: http www vsb org profguides actions_jul06 dec06 html Citizens' Demand For An Investigation of Criminal Conspiracy by Beltway Attorneys and Judges Ib. Affidavit in Support of Criminal Complaint for Conspiracy Home | Letter to Congress on the Denial of the Right to Impartial Judicial Review of Misprision of a Felony | Our Purpose | Aug. 28, 2009 Letters to Preseident Obama and Gov. Kaine to Direct Response to Petition for Cert. | U.S. Supreme Court Petition for Cert. to DC Circuit to Oppose Disbarment based on VSBDB Void Order | I. Transmittal Letter to Federal Criminal Complaint Filed in the District of Columbia | Ia. D.C. CRIMINAL COMPLAINT FOR CONSPIRACY BY JUDGES, GOVERNMENT AND BELTWAY LOBBYIST/ATTORNEYS | Ib. Affidavit in Support of Criminal Complaint for Conspiracy | Ic. MEMO IN SUPPORT OF COMPLAINT TO INDICT JUDGES FOR CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY DEPRIVING FATHER OF RIGHTS | II. Transmittal Letter to Federal Criminal Complaint filed E.D. of Virgina | III. Transmittal Letter to Federal Criminal Complaint In Pennsylvania for Misprision of a Felony | IV. Transmittal Letter Federal Criminal Complaint Filed in Colorado for Obstruction of Justice. | V. TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO CRIMINAL COMPLAINT FOR JUDGES CABRANES ET AL. VIOLATING VOID ORDER DOCTRINE | Becoming a Member | Contact Us | Calendar of Events | Members Page | Newsletter | Links United States District Court District of Columbia ________________________________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. John G. Roberts, et al., ________________________________________________) AFFIDAVIT OF PROBABLE CAUSE IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT I. INTRODUCTION 1. I am a Citizen

Constitutional basis for legislation Congress derived its power to pass the Sherman Act through its constitutional authority to regulate interstate commerce. Therefore, Federal courts only have jurisdiction to apply the Act to conduct that restrains or substantially affects either interstate commerce or trade within the District of Columbia. This requires the plaintiff must show that the conduct occurred during the flow of interstate commerce or had an appreciable effect on some activity that occurs during interstate commerce. [edit] Elements A Section 1 violation has three elements:[16] An agreement which unreasonably restrains competition and which affects interstate commerce.

Current issue -This is a request for assistance in ongoing stalking of a elder crime victim, and witness intimidation. Civil and Criminal violations to Leota Ann Frank a 74 year old elder, USA citizen, Civil Rights being violated by offical Misconduct under color of the law violations in Riverside County. Documented Fraud in Riverside Superior Court by the DA and his staff prosecutor Daima Calhoun, Coroner, APS, County Supervisors, DA Victim Advocate staff, and attorney all making a false Statement of Fact to try to prevent evidence of corruption in court. This was stopped by filing a Lemine by Lee Frank with help of internal affairs going around court staff obstruction to serve legal council of county. Proof in every step of corruption documented by mail, email and fax correspondence. Documented proof of officials knowledge and intention obstruction of justice. This Fraud includes official financial abuse. Unfortunately a prior denial by your agency with a reply that this crime was a incident and not a pattern of corruption has proven to be incorrect, and well documented by Melody Scott and the Care Center loss of License. Currently a lawsuit is filed pro se in Riverside County Superior Court, and Los Angeles Federal Court. The current judge states denial of Federal Court, giving indication that there may be Legislative involvement of Brian Floyd. Sheriff audio recording of Phil Reddish a Norco High Wrestling Coach and father of 27 year old attacker. Phil Reddish states on he has assistance by Brian Floyd past Chief Deputy prior position of Senator Rod Pacheco. Lee Frank has been unable to find a attorney to take a case for Civil Rights Violations by officials. The attack of 68 year old Nye Frank was done with intentional and professionally trained martial art moves that used strangulation and smothering techniques known to cause death. The autopsy factually documents the strangulation. The Coroner has homicide with natural cause of death on the report currently

We have a first opportunity for court

Thanks to all the Racing industry who has supported our request to Riverside County for justice. So far completely denied and the killer still stalking Lee Frank with zero assistance from Riverside County. Nye was president of the Valley Hi Water Board in Twin Pines off 243 for 8 years. Turns out Brian Floyd the cover up guy is campaine manager for the Riverside county Water board, both judges who denied Constitutional rights and a protection order are water board people, The stuff I am finding out about the politics there is so shocking I hesitate to talk about it yet. Floyds brother fire department? Brian Floyd represents the Norco Fire Department to County, I think another brother or cousin a Forestry speacial fire fighter Video Link"

http://www.diigo.com/user/nyefrank URGENT REQUEST TO WRITE YOUR ASSEMBLYMAN TO HAVE HOMICIDE OF NYE FRANK INVESTIGATED. THE RIVERSIDE COURTS ARE USING MANY CORRUPT TACTICS TO BLOCK JUSTICE

Norco High wrestling teacher son using Judo and wrestling moves on famous Race Car Builder- 68 year old elder man in front of his 73 year old wife. The teacher tells the homicide detective how to cover up homicide because friend of DA in Riverside County. Still no justice. Last time in court the judge had to remove himself. http://nyefrank.typepad.com

Nye Frank autopsy put under privacy. Federal Judge oks a privacy act for the DA, Violates Constitutional Right to Access Court

"plainly should"

Riverside County had Federal Funding for a DA Elder Victim Advocate and denied the services, along with Forensic elder autopsy evaluation. Death Certificate states natural cause of death with homicide. This does not meet statutory duty of coroner and I am requesting correction with Dr. Fajardo and Dr. Rice signature. Broken Bones on elder homicide duty to sign

In Riverside County I have seen several sites where the elder crime victims state that the DA and Sheriff block them from services. When they go to the office it lands on deaf ears