", concluding that the Navarros failed to offer any
evidence of a County
policy or custom of treating domestic violence 911 calls differently from
non-domestic violence 911 calls, nor any
evidence of a County
policy or custom of depriving residents in minority neighborhoods of equal
police protection, nor any
evidence of the
Sheriff's deliberate or conscious indifference
to the rights
of abused women or residents in minority neighborhoods.
2
The Navarros now appeal."
1 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2009
CHAPTER 611A
CRIME VICTIMS: RIGHTS, PROGRAMS, AGENCIES
DEFINITIONS AND GENERAL PROVISIONS
611A.01 DEFINITIONS.
611A.015 SCOPE OF VICTIMS' RIGHTS.
611A.02 NOTIFICATION OF VICTIM SERVICES AND
VICTIMS' RIGHTS.
611A.021 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO REQUEST WITHHOLDING
OF CERTAIN PUBLIC DATA.
611A.03 PLEA AGREEMENTS; NOTIFICATION.
611A.0301 RIGHT TO SUBMIT STATEMENT AT PLEA
PRESENTATION HEARING.
611A.031 VICTIM INPUT REGARDING PRETRIAL
DIVERSION.
611A.0311 DOMESTIC ABUSE PROSECUTIONS PLAN AND
PROCEDURES; PILOT PROGRAM.
611A.0315 VICTIM NOTIFICATION; DOMESTIC ASSAULT;
CRIMINAL SEXUAL CONDUCT; HARASSMENT.
611A.032 INACTIVE.
611A.033 SPEEDY TRIAL; NOTICE OF SCHEDULE
CHANGE.
611A.034 SEPARATE WAITING AREAS IN COURTHOUSE.
611A.035 CONFIDENTIALITY OF VICTIM'S ADDRESS.
611A.036 PROHIBITION AGAINST EMPLOYER
RETALIATION.
611A.037 PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION; VICTIM
IMPACT; NOTICE.
611A.038 RIGHT TO SUBMIT STATEMENT AT
SENTENCING.
611A.0385 SENTENCING; IMPLEMENTATION OF RIGHT
TO NOTICE OF OFFENDER RELEASE AND
EXPUNGEMENT.
611A.039 RIGHT TO NOTICE OF FINAL DISPOSITION OF
CRIMINAL CASE.
611A.0392 NOTICE TO COMMUNITY CRIME PREVENTION
GROUP.
611A.0393 CRIME ALERTS; VIOLENT CRIMES; DISABLED
ACCESS.
611A.0395 RIGHT TO INFORMATION REGARDING
DEFENDANT'S APPEAL.
611A.04 ORDER OF RESTITUTION.
611A.045 PROCEDURE FOR ISSUING ORDER OF
RESTITUTION.
611A.046 VICTIM'S RIGHT TO REQUEST PROBATION
REVIEW HEARING.
611A.05 PENALTIES NO BAR TO CIVIL REMEDIES.
611A.06 RIGHT TO NOTICE OF RELEASE.
ELECTRONIC MONITORING
611A.07 ELECTRONIC MONITORING TO PROTECT
DOMESTIC ABUSE VICTIMS; STANDARDS.
BARRING PERPETRATOR RECOVERY
611A.08 BARRING PERPETRATORS OF CRIMES FROM
RECOVERING FOR INJURIES SUSTAINED
DURING CRIMINAL CONDUCT.
SEXUAL OFFENSES; DOMESTIC ABUSE AND VIOLENCE
611A.19 TESTING SEX OFFENDER FOR HUMAN
IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS.
611A.20 NOTICE OF RISK OF SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED
DISEASE.
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION
This is Google's cache of http://home.earthlink.net/~malfeasance/id23.html. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on Jun 22, 2010 22:26:17 GMT. The current page could have changed in the meantime. Learn more
Text-only versionThese terms only appear in links pointing to this page: http www vsb org profguides actions_jul06 dec06 html
Citizens' Demand For An Investigation of Criminal Conspiracy by Beltway Attorneys and Judges
Ib. Affidavit in Support of Criminal Complaint for Conspiracy
Home | Letter to Congress on the Denial of the Right to Impartial Judicial Review of Misprision of a Felony | Our Purpose | Aug. 28, 2009 Letters to Preseident Obama and Gov. Kaine to Direct Response to Petition for Cert. | U.S. Supreme Court Petition for Cert. to DC Circuit to Oppose Disbarment based on VSBDB Void Order | I. Transmittal Letter to Federal Criminal Complaint Filed in the District of Columbia | Ia. D.C. CRIMINAL COMPLAINT FOR CONSPIRACY BY JUDGES, GOVERNMENT AND BELTWAY LOBBYIST/ATTORNEYS | Ib. Affidavit in Support of Criminal Complaint for Conspiracy | Ic. MEMO IN SUPPORT OF COMPLAINT TO INDICT JUDGES FOR CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY DEPRIVING FATHER OF RIGHTS | II. Transmittal Letter to Federal Criminal Complaint filed E.D. of Virgina | III. Transmittal Letter to Federal Criminal Complaint In Pennsylvania for Misprision of a Felony | IV. Transmittal Letter Federal Criminal Complaint Filed in Colorado for Obstruction of Justice. | V. TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO CRIMINAL COMPLAINT FOR JUDGES CABRANES ET AL. VIOLATING VOID ORDER DOCTRINE | Becoming a Member | Contact Us | Calendar of Events | Members Page | Newsletter | Links
United States District Court District of Columbia ________________________________________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
John G. Roberts, et al.,
________________________________________________)
AFFIDAVIT OF PROBABLE CAUSE IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
I. INTRODUCTION
1. I am a Citizen
Constitutional basis for legislation
Congress derived its power to pass the Sherman Act through its constitutional authority to regulate interstate commerce. Therefore, Federal courts only have jurisdiction to apply the Act to conduct that restrains or substantially affects either interstate commerce or trade within the District of Columbia. This requires the plaintiff must show that the conduct occurred during the flow of interstate commerce or had an appreciable effect on some activity that occurs during interstate commerce.
[edit] Elements
A Section 1 violation has three elements:[16]
An agreement
which unreasonably restrains competition
and which affects interstate commerce.
Constitutional basis for legislation
Congress derived its power to pass the Sherman Act through its constitutional authority to regulate interstate commerce. Therefore, Federal courts only have jurisdiction to apply the Act to conduct that restrains or substantially affects either interstate commerce or trade within the District of Columbia. This requires the plaintiff must show that the conduct occurred during the flow of interstate commerce or had an appreciable effect on some activity that occurs during interstate commerce.
[edit] Elements
A Section 1 violation has three elements:[16]
An agreement
which unreasonably restrains competition
and which affects interstate commerce.