Group items tagged

Search Legislation Questions & Answers Member Resources Member List Become a Member! Donation Get Involved Report Abuse Research & Articles Archives Useful Sites EJC Home Elder Justice Act/Patient Safety and Abuse Prevention Act Now Law Read more... Elder Justice Bills Clear Congress, Obama to Sign into Law Read more... We are urging our member to make contact with their Representative in the House this week to ask for their support of the Senate passed Health Care Reform bill (H.R.3590) as it includes the Elder Justice Act. The Coalition sent a letter to the House leadership today urging support of H.R.3590. A vote is likely either this week or next. It is the best opportunity in the six year history of the EJA to see it become law. We hope you will help us make this happen! To look up your Representative in Congress, please CLICK HERE! Contact Your Member of Congress - Find by Zip Elder Justice Act Introduced The Elder Justice Act was introduced in the Senate on April 2nd, 2009 and the House on April 21st, 2009. S. 795, the Elder Justice Act was authored in the Senate by Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and co-authored by Senator Blanche Lincoln (D-AR) with original co-sponsors Senator Herb Kohl (D-WI) and Senator Olympia Snowe (R-ME). On the House side the EJA companion bill, H.R. 2006, was authored by Rep. Peter King (R-NY) and co-sponsored by Rep. Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) and Rep. Joe Sestak (D-PA). A section by section summary of the Elder Justice Act is available in the Legislation section. Complete text of S. 795 is available here. Goals and Activities The Elder Justice Coalition, through national and grassroots advocacy, educational briefings, media outreach, research, and information dissemination seeks to: Increase public awareness of the tragedy of elder abuse, neglect and exploitation at the local, state, and national levels. Increase awareness and support for

1 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2009 CHAPTER 611A CRIME VICTIMS: RIGHTS, PROGRAMS, AGENCIES DEFINITIONS AND GENERAL PROVISIONS 611A.01 DEFINITIONS. 611A.015 SCOPE OF VICTIMS' RIGHTS. 611A.02 NOTIFICATION OF VICTIM SERVICES AND VICTIMS' RIGHTS. 611A.021 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO REQUEST WITHHOLDING OF CERTAIN PUBLIC DATA. 611A.03 PLEA AGREEMENTS; NOTIFICATION. 611A.0301 RIGHT TO SUBMIT STATEMENT AT PLEA PRESENTATION HEARING. 611A.031 VICTIM INPUT REGARDING PRETRIAL DIVERSION. 611A.0311 DOMESTIC ABUSE PROSECUTIONS PLAN AND PROCEDURES; PILOT PROGRAM. 611A.0315 VICTIM NOTIFICATION; DOMESTIC ASSAULT; CRIMINAL SEXUAL CONDUCT; HARASSMENT. 611A.032 INACTIVE. 611A.033 SPEEDY TRIAL; NOTICE OF SCHEDULE CHANGE. 611A.034 SEPARATE WAITING AREAS IN COURTHOUSE. 611A.035 CONFIDENTIALITY OF VICTIM'S ADDRESS. 611A.036 PROHIBITION AGAINST EMPLOYER RETALIATION. 611A.037 PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION; VICTIM IMPACT; NOTICE. 611A.038 RIGHT TO SUBMIT STATEMENT AT SENTENCING. 611A.0385 SENTENCING; IMPLEMENTATION OF RIGHT TO NOTICE OF OFFENDER RELEASE AND EXPUNGEMENT. 611A.039 RIGHT TO NOTICE OF FINAL DISPOSITION OF CRIMINAL CASE. 611A.0392 NOTICE TO COMMUNITY CRIME PREVENTION GROUP. 611A.0393 CRIME ALERTS; VIOLENT CRIMES; DISABLED ACCESS. 611A.0395 RIGHT TO INFORMATION REGARDING DEFENDANT'S APPEAL. 611A.04 ORDER OF RESTITUTION. 611A.045 PROCEDURE FOR ISSUING ORDER OF RESTITUTION. 611A.046 VICTIM'S RIGHT TO REQUEST PROBATION REVIEW HEARING. 611A.05 PENALTIES NO BAR TO CIVIL REMEDIES. 611A.06 RIGHT TO NOTICE OF RELEASE. ELECTRONIC MONITORING 611A.07 ELECTRONIC MONITORING TO PROTECT DOMESTIC ABUSE VICTIMS; STANDARDS. BARRING PERPETRATOR RECOVERY 611A.08 BARRING PERPETRATORS OF CRIMES FROM RECOVERING FOR INJURIES SUSTAINED DURING CRIMINAL CONDUCT. SEXUAL OFFENSES; DOMESTIC ABUSE AND VIOLENCE 611A.19 TESTING SEX OFFENDER FOR HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS. 611A.20 NOTICE OF RISK OF SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION

About GPO | Newsroom/Media | Congressional Relations | Inspector General | Careers | Contact | askGPO Home | Customers | Vendors | Libraries FDsys - GPO Access Search Government Publications Browse Government Publications About Government Publications Search on GPO Access -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Narrow Your Search Collection Congressional Record (122) Congressional Hearings (79) Congressional Bills (64) See More... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date Published 1999 (57) May (10) 27 (4) 26 (2) 19 (2) 20 (1) 18 (1) December (10) 07 (10) July (8) 29 (3) 26 (2) 21 (2) 01 (1) June (6) 14 (3) 15 (2) 16 (1) January (6) 19 (5) 06 (1) August (5) 04 (3) 05 (2) March (3) 30 (1) 25 (1) 24 (1) September (3) 24 (1) 15 (1) 14 (1) November (2) 04 (2) April (2) 29 (1) 28 (1) February (1) 24 (1) October (1) 05 (1) 2007 (53) December (29) 31 (27) 12 (1) 18 (1) September (7) 30 (4) 25 (2) 06 (1) January (4) 02 (1) 04 (1) 10 (1) 17 (1) November (3) 01 (1) 06 (1) 15 (1) May (3) 25 (1) 23 (1) 21 (1) February (2) 06 (1) 08 (1) July (2) 31 (1) 12 (1) April (1) 17 (1) March (1) 13 (1) August (1) 09 (1) 2003 (47) December (10) 31 (9) 12 (1) November (8) 25 (2) 20 (1) 18 (1) 12 (1) 04 (1) 03 (1) 01 (1) July (6) 31 (1) 21 (1) 11 (1) 10 (1) 08 (1) 01 (1) October (5) 30 (3) 21 (2) March (5) 04 (2) 19 (1) 18 (1) 06 (1) June (4) 30 (1) 12 (1) 09 (1) 04 (1) January (3) 29 (1) 15 (1) 07 (1) May (2) 22 (2) September (2) 30 (1) 03 (1) April (1) 25 (1) August (1) 21 (1) See More... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Government Author Congress (427) House of Representatives (83) Senate (78) See More... -------------------------

False Arrest The claim that is most often asserted against police is false arrest. Persons bringing this claim assert that police violated their Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable seizure. If the officer had probable cause to believe the individual had committed a crime, the arrest is reasonable and the Fourth Amendment has not been violated. Police can arrest without a warrant for a felony or misdemeanor committed in their presence. (Some states also allow warrantless arrests for misdemeanor domestic assaults not committed in the officer's presence.) Even if the information the officer relied upon later turns out to be false, the officer is not liable if he believed it was accurate at the time of the arrest. To prevail on a false arrest claim, the victim must show that the arresting officer lacked probable cause, that is, facts sufficient to cause a reasonable person to believe that a crime had been committed. http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:xsg_D3OUnnIJ:public.findlaw.com/civil-rights/more-civil-rights-topics/police-misconduct-rights.html+false+claim+against+crime+victim+constitutional+violation&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

Brian Floyd the Legislative Rep in Riverside County that Phil Reddish states helping him to cover up homicide is now going against a mandamus to enforce the law

This is Google's cache of http://home.earthlink.net/~malfeasance/id23.html. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on Jun 22, 2010 22:26:17 GMT. The current page could have changed in the meantime. Learn more Text-only versionThese terms only appear in links pointing to this page: http www vsb org profguides actions_jul06 dec06 html Citizens' Demand For An Investigation of Criminal Conspiracy by Beltway Attorneys and Judges Ib. Affidavit in Support of Criminal Complaint for Conspiracy Home | Letter to Congress on the Denial of the Right to Impartial Judicial Review of Misprision of a Felony | Our Purpose | Aug. 28, 2009 Letters to Preseident Obama and Gov. Kaine to Direct Response to Petition for Cert. | U.S. Supreme Court Petition for Cert. to DC Circuit to Oppose Disbarment based on VSBDB Void Order | I. Transmittal Letter to Federal Criminal Complaint Filed in the District of Columbia | Ia. D.C. CRIMINAL COMPLAINT FOR CONSPIRACY BY JUDGES, GOVERNMENT AND BELTWAY LOBBYIST/ATTORNEYS | Ib. Affidavit in Support of Criminal Complaint for Conspiracy | Ic. MEMO IN SUPPORT OF COMPLAINT TO INDICT JUDGES FOR CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY DEPRIVING FATHER OF RIGHTS | II. Transmittal Letter to Federal Criminal Complaint filed E.D. of Virgina | III. Transmittal Letter to Federal Criminal Complaint In Pennsylvania for Misprision of a Felony | IV. Transmittal Letter Federal Criminal Complaint Filed in Colorado for Obstruction of Justice. | V. TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO CRIMINAL COMPLAINT FOR JUDGES CABRANES ET AL. VIOLATING VOID ORDER DOCTRINE | Becoming a Member | Contact Us | Calendar of Events | Members Page | Newsletter | Links United States District Court District of Columbia ________________________________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. John G. Roberts, et al., ________________________________________________) AFFIDAVIT OF PROBABLE CAUSE IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT I. INTRODUCTION 1. I am a Citizen

Constitutional basis for legislation Congress derived its power to pass the Sherman Act through its constitutional authority to regulate interstate commerce. Therefore, Federal courts only have jurisdiction to apply the Act to conduct that restrains or substantially affects either interstate commerce or trade within the District of Columbia. This requires the plaintiff must show that the conduct occurred during the flow of interstate commerce or had an appreciable effect on some activity that occurs during interstate commerce. [edit] Elements A Section 1 violation has three elements:[16] An agreement which unreasonably restrains competition and which affects interstate commerce.

"The uncontested facts show that Evans cannot satisfy the requirement of "affirmatively prov[ing] prejudice." It is inconceivable to us, and not merely improbable as in Henderson v. Morgan, 426 U.S. 637, 644 n. 12, 96 S.Ct. 2253, 2257 n. 12, 49 L.Ed.2d 108 (1976), that Evans would have gone to trial on a defense of intoxication, or that if he had done so he either would have been acquitted or, if convicted, would nevertheless have been given a shorter sentence than he actually received. It just is not believable that Evans did all the things he does not deny having done, involving elaborate negotiations with the police over several hours, in some sort of alcohol-induced trance. In this respect the present case resembles Morgan v. Israel, 735 F.2d 1033 (7th Cir.1984). In evaluating the voluntariness of Morgan's failure to plead not guilty we said, "It is sufficiently clear that Morgan had no hope at all of an acquittal to enable us to infer that he would not have changed his plea to not guilty .... He admitted having shot Mallason; and when you shoot a person several times, with fatal results, the inference of deliberate homicide is irresistible .... The jury never would have believed that he lacked the ... elementary mental capacity required to form a murderous intent...." Id. at 1036. So here, no jury could have believed that Evans was not acting deliberately when he did all the things he did in the police station. Therefore, being told that if he had not been acting deliberately he would have been acquitted of some of the offenses with which he was charged could not have led him to change his plea and to win acquittal."

There are no common-law offenses against the United States, and one may be subject to punishment for crime in a federal court only for the commission or omission of an act defined by statute or regulation having legislative authority, and then only if punishment is authorized by Congress. http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:c1KTay-Fv2EJ:www.answers.com/topic/criminal-law+legislative+homicide+cover+up+equal+to+criminal+conduct+chargeable&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

There are no common-law offenses against the United States, and one may be subject to punishment for crime in a federal court only for the commission or omission of an act defined by statute or regulation having legislative authority, and then only if punishment is authorized by Congress. http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:c1KTay-Fv2EJ:www.answers.com/topic/criminal-law+legislative+homicide+cover+up+equal+to+criminal+conduct+chargeable&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

There are no common-law offenses against the United States, and one may be subject to punishment for crime in a federal court only for the commission or omission of an act defined by statute or regulation having legislative authority, and then only if punishment is authorized by Congress. http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:c1KTay-Fv2EJ:www.answers.com/topic/criminal-law+legislative+homicide+cover+up+equal+to+criminal+conduct+chargeable&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

There are no common-law offenses against the United States, and one may be subject to punishment for crime in a federal court only for the commission or omission of an act defined by statute or regulation having legislative authority, and then only if punishment is authorized by Congress. http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:c1KTay-Fv2EJ:www.answers.com/topic/criminal-law+legislative+homicide+cover+up+equal+to+criminal+conduct+chargeable&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

Constitutional basis for legislation Congress derived its power to pass the Sherman Act through its constitutional authority to regulate interstate commerce. Therefore, Federal courts only have jurisdiction to apply the Act to conduct that restrains or substantially affects either interstate commerce or trade within the District of Columbia. This requires the plaintiff must show that the conduct occurred during the flow of interstate commerce or had an appreciable effect on some activity that occurs during interstate commerce. [edit] Elements A Section 1 violation has three elements:[16] An agreement which unreasonably restrains competition and which affects interstate commerce.

Nye Frank Homicide Cover up may come out now in the light and show the gross corruption in Riverside County

Riverside County Politics- Why would victims compensation be under the privacy act? Corruption?

ADA

Nye Frank autopsy put under privacy. Federal Judge oks a privacy act for the DA, Violates Constitutional Right to Access Court

I never imagined being a crime victim. I never dreamed of so much corruption. I am shocked it happens with official blind eye to such a extream it shuts down a community care for each other.

There are no common-law offenses against the United States, and one may be subject to punishment for crime in a federal court only for the commission or omission of an act defined by statute or regulation having legislative authority, and then only if punishment is authorized by Congress. http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:c1KTay-Fv2EJ:www.answers.com/topic/criminal-law+legislative+homicide+cover+up+equal+to+criminal+conduct+chargeable&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

There are no common-law offenses against the United States, and one may be subject to punishment for crime in a federal court only for the commission or omission of an act defined by statute or regulation having legislative authority, and then only if punishment is authorized by Congress. http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:c1KTay-Fv2EJ:www.answers.com/topic/criminal-law+legislative+homicide+cover+up+equal+to+criminal+conduct+chargeable&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

Please think before you vote because there is a evil going on and it is only happening because it is from the top down even the Attorney General after being told case closed exceptional(illegally) and Brady material like Mike Nefong he said now Lee Frank at 72 had to prove conflict of interest which I now have. This is what our Constitution was all about separation of power

PERHAPS SOMETHING GOOD CAN COME FROM THIS BAD. NYE FRANK NEVER GOT IN A FIGHT IT WAS A ATTACK. LEE FRANK IS STILL STALKED WITH THE SHERIFF AND DA ACTING LIKE SHE IS A GHOST. I WISH THEY WOULD FACE THE LAW LIKE THE REST OF US

One of the worst things is Nye Frank is in the International Drag Racing Hall of Fame -He will always be thought of when Riverside Drag Raceway is talked about as the Famous Feight Train Dragster still has some records. Lee Breedlove-Frank held the womans world land speed record. Instead of Riverside treating them proud they took our joy and his life.

PERHAPS SOMETHING GOOD CAN COME FROM THIS BAD. NYE FRANK NEVER GOT IN A FIGHT IT WAS A ATTACK. LEE FRANK IS STILL STALKED WITH THE SHERIFF AND DA ACTING LIKE SHE IS A GHOST. I WISH THEY WOULD FACE THE LAW LIKE THE REST OF US