"But when Mark Russinovich, Microsoft's CTO for Azure, took the stage at Build 2015 in San Francisco Wednesday morning to demonstrate how containerized microservices applications work in Windows Server.
[...]
As is his wont, he dove right in to a demonstration of using Docker Build (on a PowerShell command line) to package and deploy an ASP.NET web site as a Docker container. [...] He took only a few seconds to package the web site into a container image, then he ran the package with the docker run command.
[...]
And then he paused, took the temperature of the room, and may have recognized that Windows developers may have been completely confused by what they were seeing. [...] So Russinovich asked for a show of hands of folks in the room who might have heard of something called Linux. (Don't worry, he's done this before.)
[...]
He then used a new build of Visual Studio, running in Windows, to publish the container to the Linux host. He then proceeded to debug the running Linux app, including setting a remote breakpoint, from Visual Studio.
[...]
Without saying so explicitly, Mark Russinovich was obsoleting much of Windows Server before developers' eyes."
MonoHelper offers XBuild integration into Visual Studio, so you can use Mono within Visual Studio (Build & Run). When using XBuild or XRebuild command, MonoHelper detects current installed Mono Runtime or use preconfigured installation path, call XBuild with current configuration settings and outputs the results into the Output Console. It also generates pdb symbol files, so you can debug XBuild compiled programs with Visual Studio (running with .NET Runtime - see Stackoverflow about how this is done). If you want to run your program with installed Mono runtime, this is also possible.
Hello everybody, I'm developing a custom authentication module. As part of the process I have to redirect the user to a second site and then the second site redirect the user back to the custom module.
For this I'm using the RedirectCallback, but while debugging I noticed that the module gets initialized a second time after the users comes back from the second site. I was wondering if this is the expected behavior or if I'm doing something wrong.
This is how the callbacks are defined in the xml.