Argument: J.D.Salinger is not a post fruedian writer in his work.
Claim: "Salinger,too, is post-freudian and to analyze him for his readers in Freudian terms is meaningless."
Evidence: "I think a modern novelist expects the reader to assume the Freudian ideas with his as a part of the general intelegence wich he brings to bear on (or wich he opposes to) the reality that he presents in his novel". He presents that Holden is a Frueudian idea. In reality he is just the opposite. He is selfish but he does not use his motivation for desired pleasures.
Claim: "Salinger,too, is post-freudian and to analyze him for his readers in Freudian terms is meaningless."
Evidence: "I think a modern novelist expects the reader to assume the Freudian ideas with his as a part of the general intelegence wich he brings to bear on (or wich he opposes to) the reality that he presents in his novel". He presents that Holden is a Frueudian idea. In reality he is just the opposite. He is selfish but he does not use his motivation for desired pleasures.
http://go.galegroup.com.lib.chandleraz.gov/ps/retrieve.do?sgHitCountType=None&sort=RELEVANCE&inPS=true&prodId=LitRC&userGroupName=chandler_main&tabID=T001&searchId=R3&resultListType=RESULT_LIST&contentSegment=&searchType=BasicSearchForm¤tPosition=3&contentSet=GALE%7CH1100034789&&docId=GALE|H1100034789&docType=GALE&role=LitRC