Skip to main content

Home/ Groups/ Government Diigo
Ryan Koontz

Judge apologizes for forwarding a racist e-mail aimed at Obama - CNN.com - 0 views

  •  
    updated 2:02 AM EST, Fri March 2, 2012 (CNN) -- Montana's chief federal judge has offered his apologies for forwarding a racist e-mail aimed at President Barack Obama. The judge also initiated a judicial misconduct investigation against himself. Liberal advocacy groups demanded that U.S. District Judge Richard Cebull resign.
Julia Hetrick

Jon Stewart mocks Santorum for misinterpreting J.F.K. speech | The Raw Story - 3 views

  •  
    By Eric W. DolanTuesday, February 28, 2012 0:16 EST Jon Stewart, the host of The Daily Show, highlighted the fact that Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum inverted the meaning of John F. Kennedy's famous 1960 speech pledging to keep the Pope out of politics. Santorum said the speech made him want to vomit.
  • ...2 more comments...
  •  
    Colbert is better
  •  
    Yeah but, I am America and so can you
  •  
    I like when people get called out on things because they don't know what they are talking about.
  •  
    Colbert and Stewart, i see them as equals, joel
Christina Constant

SOPA Blackout: Wikipedia, Google, Wired Protest 'Internet Censorship' - 0 views

  •  
    Go to Wikipedia's English home page and it will look like its regular self for a second, but then -   Wikipedia's English-language landing page. Go to Google's homepage, and you'll find its logo blacked out. If you click on the black box in its place (or the link below the search box), you'll be led to an invitation to petition Congress: "End Piracy, Not Liberty."   Google's homepage.
Lauren Myers

China to soften its one-child policy slogans, but not the law itself - 2 views

  •  
    The Chinese government isn't getting rid of its one-child policy currently in place. It's just making it sound better. China's communist party newspaper, People's Daily, reports that the government will revamp its abrasive-sounding slogans surrounding the policy. People's Daily cites several examples of "harsh slogans," including those "which sometimes even threaten criminal acts."
theresa schwenk

Boy who can only eat 7 foods - 29 views

  •  
    poor kid. that would be horrible to only be able to eat 7 different types of food
  • ...9 more comments...
  •  
    I have heard of this before. Poor kid though it would stink to go through this, however by the time that he would become older he would get to eat more foods.
  •  
    how is a child born with this disease? i would hate to be like that. i feel bad for the little kid.
  •  
    There was a story about a kid like this on true life as you get older you get to eat more.
  •  
    That must be really hard dang i feel bad
  •  
    I bet he makes some of the most creative dishes.
  •  
    poor kid. the thought of only being able to eat certain foods must be brutal.
  •  
    I think that would suck bad. i wonder how he feels.
  •  
    This is just awful. I hope he grows out of it.
  •  
    That's his fault
  •  
    Unsolved Mysteries?
  •  
    i hope he likes them...
Julia Hetrick

Wall Street fights rule limiting oil speculation - 0 views

  •  
    By Jennifer Liberto @CNNMoneyMarkets February 27, 2012: 5:43 PM ET Wall Street is fighting a new rule that cracks down on oil market speculation, which some blame for run-up at the pump. WASHINGTON (CNNMoney) -- Wall Street is pushing to stop a new rule that would crack down on speculation in the energy markets, which many blame for contributing to the spike in gas prices.
Bryan Pregon

Iowa Lawmakers Now Seek To Ban Traffic Cameras - 9 views

  •  
    Has there been any real results from installing the traffic cameras? I know that the ones by my house don't always work so it just seems like a waste of resources there. They have probably helped reduce the amount of people that step on it when the light turns yellow but does that really solve any problems? or just teach us to rive faster in order to avoid the red lights?
  • ...5 more comments...
  •  
    I saw an article this summer which argues they cause more rear end collisions when drivers slam on the brakes to avoid a ticket. Interesting read on both sides of the issue from ABC news. http://goo.gl/JKwmO
  •  
    I believe that traffic cameras cause many people to become fearful of red light intersections. Because of their fear, they sometimes don't pay as much attention to their own surrounding
  •  
    i think they should get rid of the traffic cameras. ive almost hit someone bc they slammed on the brakes unexpectedly. they can be hazardous
  •  
    I agree with Zac And Alexis. I hate it when its counting down, and you have to determine if you want to stop or speed up. Its very stressful!
  •  
    I think they should keep them. There good for safety and people can be more aware because they know they would get a ticket if not.
  •  
    I think they should get rid of them, people are more scared to get a ticket than to slam on their breaks surprising the car behind them, causing a fender bender accident.
  •  
    I agree with the ban. Sure, people run less red lights, but they have caused stoplights to be more of a danger. People start speeding more to make the light to not get a ticket or brake really hard and cause accidents.
Bryan Pregon

Google Wants To Put Sat Dish Farm In Council Bluffs - 9 views

  •  
    They invested millions into our city for the land and resources, not to mention the free programs they offer to our citizens. I don't see a problem with passing over the metro area for the beta testing of fiber optic broadband. Google gives us plenty of benefits they aren't obliged to.
  •  
    i say no, i dont want those big ugly things taking up where i want to live. plus we dont know how many they want to put in and where
Bryan Pregon

Bill C-309 | openparliament.ca - 18 views

  •  
    OK so it is not being proposed in the USA, but this bill recently introduced in Canada is pretty interesting. Think about the people in our country who protest, but don't want their identity to be shown. Would you support this bill or not?
  • ...12 more comments...
  •  
    link seems broken... try this http://openparliament.ca/bills/41-1/C-309/
  •  
    I think its a good law, people should be able to know who you are. If you really wanna protest, you shouldn't care.
  •  
    I believe that if you truly believe in the cause, then you should have to face the consequences, even if that means losing your job or your reputation and status.
  •  
    This bill makes sense. Public safety is at the forefront of this bill, if a protest gets violent or other harmful/unlawful acts occur the persons the are held responsible will be able to be identified. But looking at it from the other side, people might want to conceal their identity at protests, or the masks are part of their protest(example Anonymous). If this bill passes people will be made, if it doesn't pass other people will be mad. Who is the Canadian government ok will making mad?
  •  
    This bill should be passed because if you're risking yourself by already being there, you should have to show your face. Also, if the situation ever turned violent, that person wouldn't get away with it because their face wasn't exposed so they could be identified.
  •  
    I think that this bill should be passed because the police should have the right to identify anyone who is protesting. If you want to protest, protecting your identity shouldn't be a major concern because you would want people to know who you are, and what you are speaking out against.
  •  
    I think if you are going to protest, you are there for a reason, that you strongly believe in, so you should not want to hide who you really are
  •  
    It should be considered that this is a trade for security by means of liberty. Sacrificing freedom for a small degree of protection. If this bill passes, it could easily snowball to other things (this may be a bit of a reach) such as controlling what you can wear altogether just so that you can be identified at all times just in case you might be possibly considering intending to commit a crime.
  •  
    As said in earlier comments, I think that if you want to protest IN PUBLIC then the public has the right to know who you are. If you want you can protest in your house and no one needs to know who you are. But out side of you cant hide from the public if your are going to stand outside with a big sign and yell out things in front of people.
  •  
    I think this should be a bill that becomes a law.
  •  
    I see it as your there or your protesting for a reason so why hide it. If your protesting you believe something is ether wrong or right so why hide your believes. If you don't want to be seen or noticed here's an easy answer don't go!
  •  
    I think that you should be able to wear a mask, because if you're protesting something that you believe in, or don't believe in, than it is a personal matter and you should be able to conceal your identity from the public.
  •  
    I think it might be better if you have to register to be part of a protest but to have the list sealed unless things get violent
  •  
    I think that they should show there faces. Its there choice to go, so then show yourself, dont hide.
Bryan Pregon

Occupy protesters sue New York City over pepper spray incident | Reuters - 2 views

  •  
    i hope the protesters win
Carrie Fuest

Greece falling apart. - 2 views

  •  
    It's sad that even their pay was cut to try to reduce the debt and it has caused the country to sink even deeper.
  •  
    that would suck to get a pay cut, and the country sinks deeper is even worse.
Brice Johnson

Fidel Castro unveils 1,000-page memoir - 0 views

  •  
    This would be an interesting read, give a lot of insight into his mind
« First ‹ Previous 2041 - 2060 of 2241 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page