Skip to main content

Home/ Government Diigo/ Group items tagged Defense

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Jeremy Vogel

Defending the insanity defense - 0 views

  •  
    "The Supreme Court refused this week to review the murder conviction of an Idaho man who was prevented by state law from offering an insanity defense. The court's abdication of its responsibility encourages other states to dismantle a central principle of Anglo-American law: that a defendant should not be held criminally responsible when mental illness makes it impossible for him to tell right from wrong."
Bryan Pregon

Former South Carolina officer to sentenced in killing of unarmed black man - CNN - 12 views

  •  
    "In May, Slager pleaded guilty to deprivation of rights under color of law after a murder trial ended in a mistrial. He admitted he didn't shoot Scott in self defense and said he used excessive force. Federal prosecutors are seeking a life sentence. Prosecutors believe Slager committed second-degree murder and should also be punished for obstructing justice."
  • ...1 more comment...
  •  
    I think those punishments are completely necessary and he deserves it. There's stories like this all the time but a lot of cops won't admit to not shooting them for self defense.
  •  
    I think that the officer should get life in prison for killing this man. The man ran but there's other options than firing your gun at him, there was no threat to the officer, he was unarmed, and the officer said he used force that was unnecessary.
  •  
    The cop shouldn't of shot the man in the back, there was no threat towards the officer. If the man pulled a knife or a gun out then I'll see why the police officer shot him, but because the man had no weapons on him and was just running way he shouldn't of gotten shot.
Megan Frush

Troops worry about defense, job cuts - 0 views

  •  
    "The soldiers of the 173rd Airborne Brigade Combat Team have gone to war five times since 9/11, and 84 have been killed - including 13 during their current deployment to Afghanistan. How would the impending budget cuts affect civilians at their post? And what will it all mean for their spouses and family members who work on the base?"
nelsontad

Edith Windsor: Case against Defense of Marriage Act 'went beautifully' | The Raw Story - 0 views

  •  
    i think that you should be able to get married no matter if your gay or not its not their life so why are they so against gay marriage
  •  
    in my opinion I think that you should have the right to be married no matter if your gay or not. Its not their life its yours i just dont understand why they are so against gay marriage. It's not like its hurting us.
  •  
    I'm glad that she won this case, because the law states that if your husband or wife were to die, you get the things they leave behind. I don't see why it would be different if you are gay. It just makes no sense. I don't understand why this law was passed in the first place.
Mallory Huggins

Obama to nominate Hagel, Brennan for top national security posts - 0 views

  •  
    It's interesting to read about the controversy over Obama's pick defense secretary and counterterrorism adviser.
  •  
    I think it's fair to say that the criticisms made against Hagel are in the past now. He should be fit for the job. From a defense standpoint there will be a lot of issues at hand in this administration.
  •  
    I think Brennan is a wise choice because he's been around for awhile and seems to have a lot of knowledge about a lot of things.
andi nixon

Pentagon makes women in combat rule change official - 0 views

  •  
    Defense Secretary Leon Panetta speaks at a news conference in London on Jan. 19. (Photo: Jacquelyn Martin, AP) WASHINGTON -- Defense Secretary Leon Panetta announced Thursday that the military will lift its ban on women serving in combat roles, which will open about 230,000 posts, including those on the front lines.
  • ...3 more comments...
  •  
    I feel that this is a good thing and should be encouraged within the U.S.
  •  
    This is really good. Women have shown great courage and sacrifice on and off the battlefield, and they admitted that.
  •  
    This is one important step to equal rights.
  •  
    This history right here.
  •  
    Let the women do what they want if they can help in the war that makes us stronger.
xolson974

Pentagon buried study that found $125 billion in wasteful spending - 2 views

  •  
    A Defense Department study that proposed cutting $125 billion in administrative waste from the Pentagon budget was buried amid concerns the findings would give Congress an excuse to further slash defense spending, the Washington Post reported on Monday.
Sarah Trant

New Defense Plan To Slim Down Military, Shift U.S. Security Focus To Asia | Fox News - 5 views

  •  
    I think this will be a good thing for the U.S. I am pretty sure that there are enough people who want to fight for our country's freedom so why do we need to keep paying more and more for the military? I don't think they are going to take all of the money the military has.
Bryan Pregon

Congress Again Buys Abrams Tanks the Army Doesn't Want | Military.com - 5 views

  •  
    "The new defense spending bill includes $120 million for tanks that the Army has repeatedly said it doesn't want."
  •  
    I think that congress should quit spending money on things we don't need. The military has repeatedly told them not to make more, but congress keeps having more made by spending money to keep the factories running.
hannahperry

Officers in Florida Shootings Say They Can Stand Their Ground, Too - The New York Times - 0 views

  •  
    "Critics say the law makes it too easy to claim self-defense when violence could have been avoided, and that white people's fears are more likely to be deemed "reasonable" than black people's."
abomba12

Trump budget seeks defense spending boost, major cuts in other agencies - 0 views

  •  
    President Trump on Thursday morning released a $1.15 trillion budget proposal that seeks a major increase in military and other security spending while slashing spending in a wide range of other agencies including the EPA and State Department.
Bryan Pregon

Entire U.S. Senate to go to White House for North Korea briefing | Reuters - 0 views

  •  
    "All 100 senators have been asked to the White House for the briefing by Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis, Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats and General Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said White House spokesman Sean Spicer on Monday."
ataylor074

U.S. strike in Syria: Biden explains justification in letter to congressional leadershi... - 5 views

  •  
    Do you guys think he was justified for doing this?
  • ...1 more comment...
  •  
    I think he was justified, but I can see both sides. He was trying to protect people and in self-defense as he stated it's his job to protect everyone even those abroad. So, I think both sides have a right to their opinion.
  •  
    I feel like there were probably better ways to deal with the self defense act rather than going straight to an airstrike. It also makes it a little unsettling that Biden didn't have a conversation about it with other congress members and just did it.
  •  
    I think he shouldn't have done this and taking this action this early into his presidency shows somewhat of a disregard for some of the morals he touted himself on to even get elected. Even if he had found himself justified in doing this to say taking into account those morals he reached this conclusion to go there so quickly is disingenuos
Bryan Pregon

Biden calls to restore Voting Rights Act, signs order to expand access - 29 views

  •  
    "President Joe Biden on Sunday signed an executive order aimed at helping to ensure all Americans have the right to vote by increasing access to voter registration services and information."
  • ...22 more comments...
  •  
    This is important to ensure the right to vote is extended towards everyone,and it gets more people out there to vote. These are important thing when we pick a new leader to represent the country as a whole.
  •  
    Most people don't think that voting is important but it is and it is good that the president signed an executive order to see if more people will vote
  •  
    In my opinion, this new executive order is amazing. According to the article, "Every eligible voter should be able to vote and have that vote counted. If you have the best ideas, you have nothing to hide. Let the people vote."(konish) I totally agree with it because it's time for new beneficial changes and reformations.
  •  
    One of the peoples greatest defenses against corruption in our government is our ability to vote.
  •  
    Extension of the right to vote to everyone who possibly can is the most important thing in maintaining democracy so this is a very good thing
  •  
    It's good that Biden has put in place this new executive order. It's important that everyone who is eligible to vote should have the opportunity too.
  •  
    i agree that if we did not have our right to vote then we would lose our best defense against corruption.
  •  
    I think giving more people the ability to vote is great. Hopefully this attempt to bring the voter count up works and more people can voice their opinion on who they think is the best fit for our country.
  •  
    I think this is good because, everyone should have a right to vote, if we were not able to that would not give us a choice to anything.
  •  
    Biden says that if we allow everyone to vote, it will repair and also strengthen the democracy party. I think it is a pretty good idea, it would mean everyone will have more benefitions.
  •  
    This is a good thing because I think that having more people experiencing the "American" life will have good input on who to vote for.
  •  
    This is a good thing for Biden because congress will restore the voting rights for Americans, and I think by doing that he will have more people experiencing life, and maybe the people will have good input on him so they will vote for him for the next presidential election again.
  •  
    I think this executive order is amazing for our country. All people should have the right to vote, and this executive order is making it easier for them.
  •  
    this is good because they can't pull any more tricks or try to get people not to vote anymore, which equals fair elections in the future.
  •  
    it's important and good that biden signed this act because it makes sure everyone votes and the voting count raises.
  •  
    I think that Biden signing this bill helps ensure that Americans can exercise their right to vote and that it will help the voting count to increase.
  •  
    It's really important that Biden signed this act because it makes sure everyone votes and the voting count raises.
  •  
    I think it's good that Biden signed this bill because it will give more people the opportunity to vote.
  •  
    I think this will be beneficial considering all the sneaky tactics that they've been using to get people not to vote, so this will help make voting fairer and give more opportunities to people.
  •  
    I do believe that it does so happen to be a good thing that Mr. President Joe Biden has signed this act so that more people will have the chance to vote.
  •  
    I think this is a good idea, we need more people voting if they can.
  •  
    I like how voting is continuing to be a bigger issue people are bringing up because people living in America should get a say in who controls the government, regardless of who they are.
  •  
    I think this was a really good move and America should be grateful he's doing something beneficial.
  •  
    I think it is good Biden is doing something to make voting better for everyone, especially for us since were going to be able to vote next election
jessicasolorio

Can people bring guns to voting sites? You might be surprised - Los Angeles Times - 27 views

  •  
    What's your guys' opinion on this?
  • ...28 more comments...
  •  
    People should not be allowed to bring guns to the polling stations. These can be used as a form of voter intimidation which is a crime, though at it's core I have respect for people's right to carry, guns should never be used to scare or intimidate voters
  •  
    This should not be allowed. This could cause many harmful things including intimidation and crimes against a particular group of people.
  •  
    No, people should not be allowed to bring guns to polling stations.
  •  
    No, people shouldn't be allowed to bring guns to voting sites. I feel like this will create more problems than solutions.
  •  
    This should not be allowed
  •  
    I dont think people should be able to bring guns to a voting site
  •  
    This should not be able to allowed
  •  
    I don't think there is a reason they should even feel the need to bring a gun to a voting site. But no they shouldn't bring a gun.
  •  
    This should not be allowed I think that this could cause major issues with other people and safety.
  •  
    People should not be allowed to do this. What would the purpose of having a gun be? Something bad could happen if this was allowed.
  •  
    This shouldn't be allowed. It's unnecessary and could cause an even bigger issue than there would have been if a gun hadn't been brought.
  •  
    i feel having fire arms there would not be okay and it would not be safe many things could haoppen it could cause chaos
  •  
    Thanks for posting this Jessica! A good amount of responses so far. I will post a wikipedia link for state-by-state carry rules. If that isn't tricky enough, some states have laws differentiating "carrying" a firearm and "brandishing" (holding it pointed toward someone). I suspect we will be hearing more about this over the next week. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_laws_in_the_United_States_by_state#Iowa
  •  
    No people shouldn't be allowed to bring a gun because agreeing with someone else's comment, it would only cause more problems than solutions, therefore it is unnecessary.
  •  
    I don't think people should bring guns to the voting site because it may cause others not to come and may scare people. It would not be safe and there could be many things to go wrong.
  •  
    I think bringing guns is super unnecessary to bring to a polling site, it could scare people away and possibly be the cause of an injury or death.
  •  
    i think that unless you have your concealed carry licence, you should be able to bring it. yes, there is a chance of people being afraid, but there is nothing you can do about that. it isn't going to harm the election in any way and there are rules that have to be followed in order to be given the privilege of the license in the first place
  •  
    why would you bring a gun, something for self-defense, killing, hurting... to voting sites? ummmmmmm
  •  
    I simply do not see the point. I mean sure you can bring them if you are licensed but that doesn't mean I'm not going to judge you because clearly, the purpose is to make a statement, and not for self-defense. It's not like a grandma is going to point a gun at your head and make you vote Biden.
  •  
    I personally think that you shouldn't be able to bring guns to voting sites. People are already intimidated going to these places to vote, and adding weapons would just cause more harm than good.
  •  
    I personally don't believe there is any reason to bring a weapon to voting sites at all. There should be no weapons in a building during a government event.
  •  
    If the gun holder has a licensed weapon and has years of experience with guns, then I think it wouldn't be a problem. A problem I noticed in the USA is everyone is very paranoid about guns, but not the person holding the gun. If the person has had little to no mental health issues and had years of experience with guns, then It shouldn't be a problem.
  •  
    It doesn't make sense for people to be able to open carry firearms because votes could feel intimidated by the weapons into voting for a candidate they don't actually like.
  •  
    i can't think of a reason of why people can bring guns into voting places. yes, they have a right to own one, but i don't think you need to carry a gun with you to vote
  •  
    I think it's okay for someone with a license to carry to bring one in because that's the entire purpose of a license, but I think it should be kept to only small firearms in the event that someone were to attempt to attack a voting site.
  •  
    I do not think people should bring guns to voting sites there is absolutely no reason. It only takes one person to get mad or get their feelings hurt and then start shooting then people are hurt or even dead. Especially when the world and the people are like the way they are right now.
  •  
    I don't think that people should bring guns to voting sites because it would be easy for them to just decide to shoot it up if people don't agree with them.
  •  
    I don't think it's a good idea to bring guns to voting sites because there is no point to. You wouldn't be in danger more than likely so there is no reason to take a gun with you to vote. And it may make other people uncomfortable and feel less safe while voting.
  •  
    It's a bad idea. Why would someone need to bring a gun to a voting site? Just vote and then leave. leave your gun at home for this.
  •  
    I think it's a bad idea to let people bring guns to voting sites because theirs literally no reason to, there going to vote, and if anything letting people take guns will just make it worse.
david martin

Supreme Court skeptical of DOMA - 0 views

  •  
    Edie Windsor, the 83-year-old lesbian who sued the United States government for discriminatory treatment under the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), expressed optimism today that the Supreme Court will strike down the 17-year old law. "I think it went beautifully," Windsor said from outside of the court after today's oral arguments in United States v.
Cara Ireland

After closed-door hearing with defense, judge delays next phase of Jodi Arias trial - 0 views

  •  
    A day after jurors found her guilty of first-degree murder, Jodi Arias and her attorneys met with a judge in a closed-door hearing Thursday, according to a source with knowledge of the proceedings.
Jeremy Vogel

Military to open combat jobs to women - 0 views

  •  
    The U.S. military is ending its policy of excluding women from combat and will open combat jobs and direct combat units to female troops, CNN has learned. Multiple officials confirm to CNN that Defense Secretary Leon Panetta will make the announcement tomorrow and notify Congress of the planned change in policy.
kfloerchinger

U.S. official: 'Right now it sucks' to be ISIS - 1 views

  •  
    "We are dropping cyber bombs. We have never done that before," Deputy Secretary of Defense Robert Work told reporters traveling with him. "Just like we have an air campaign, I want to have a cyber campaign. I want to use all the space capabilities I have."
xolson974

US Defense Secretary James Mattis lands in Baghdad - 0 views

  •  
    Ahead of the unannounced trip to the Iraqi capital, Mattis told reporters in Abu Dhabi that he was heading to Baghdad, "because I need to get current on the situation there, political situation, the enemy situation, and the friendly situation."
1 - 20 of 37 Next ›
Showing 20 items per page