Skip to main content

Home/ Africom/ Group items tagged mbeki

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Arabica Robusta

Pambazuka - Moeletsi Mbeki addresses AFRICOM - 0 views

  • as a self-critical entrepreneur in post-Apartheid South Africa, Mbeki was in a position to use the controversial platform to test his persuasive prowess, exhorting them to consider a more humanitarian and developmental AFRICOM, that would link not only to African governments, but also to ‘society’. It is this link to society and Mbeki’s development thesis that piques curiosity about Mbeki’s opening remarks – that South Africa was the lead capital exporter into Africa, ahead of traditional rivals the UK and France, as well as the US. The common interest between the US and South Africa, said Mbeki, was to provide security for their mutual investments in the region. The ‘truths’ Mbeki espoused may not be convincing to critically engaged Africans; they seem tailored to the sensitive palate of his audience.
  • Mbeki said he tried to show that the challenge facing sub-Saharan Africa, based on ‘the deep roots of Africa's security and development crises’, is ‘not state building as many analysts believe. The immediate challenge most of Africa faces is society building.’ In short, this is the role he recommended for AFRICOM.
    • Arabica Robusta
       
      (Neo)colonial intervention as "governance" and "capacity building." The civilizing mission re-dux.
  • ‘Building a viable, sustainable and stable society requires the establishment and development of legitimate, socially hegemonic group or groups that can then build a viable state,‘ he said, which the European colonial powers failed to do. They left behind a semblance of a state that had no social anchors, which ‘led to Africa's instability during the last half a century‘ and continues to this day in many countries.
    • Arabica Robusta
       
      How can AFRICOM accomplish this? It's a military command first and foremost.
  • ...10 more annotations...
  • While addressing the legacy of slavery and colonialism, Mbeki seems to have also taken obsequious self-effacement to new heights, perhaps reflecting his perceptions of the audience’s susceptibilities and his desire to be persuasive or influential. He cited a number of reasons why Africans were to blame, and responsible for the current problems. These types of remarks were made when he described Africa’s handicaps
  • On the results of instability, Mbeki said that an important factor that determines whether a country develops or not is, on the one hand, its ability to generate a meaningful economic surplus. On the other hand, it is its ability to direct a large part of that surplus to productive investment rather than merely to private consumption. As a result of Africa's endemic instability, a large part of sub-Saharan Africa's surplus leaves the continent.
  • Assessing Mbeki’s positions is complicated, as one cannot easily discount the accommodation he made to reach out to his audience. After all this is an audience charged with everything from humanitarian relief to covert anti-terror activities, some of whose operations are alleged to violate fundamental international laws.
  • Second, Mbeki posits a developmental model based on comparative advantage, but he does not explain its failure even though it has implemented in many parts of Africa for over 30 years. Yet Mbeki does not hesitate to put the blame ‘in the final analysis’ squarely on African leaders themselves, even though he glosses over the evidence produced by the developmental model he endorses, which north of the Limpopo was foisted on many African countries in the most dastardly circumstances.
  • South Africa endorsed the comparative advantage development model as part of its home-grown structural adjustment programme, GEAR (Growth, Employment and Redistribution strategy). As a consequence of this and other flanking policies, the quality of the composition of its exports has been primitivised and it is more commodity dependent than it was during Apartheid.
  • Third, it is unclear why Mbeki views the US AFRICOM as important. There is already a multilateral body legally charged with maintaining peace and security – the United Nations. The castration of the UN Security Council by the US invention of the concept of pre-emptive war and its invasion of Iraq serves only to weaken the thrust of Mbeki’s case. Not to argue for Africa‘s rights, at the very least, under settled international law is a glaring and pandering omission.
  • Recently the South African Defence Minister Lindiwe Sisulu told Parliament that she wanted the defence force to provide a rite of passage for young people..."l
  • No doubt there are many weary and heavy hearted mothers and fathers across the country that would perceive this as the answer in dealing with their wilfully delinquent and errant adolescents, more out of desperation in the hope that some stern discipline from figures of authority will wise them up to the requirements of life.
  • There are many things that as citizens we do need, and there are many things that the Minister of War and the ANC should be doing for this country, but they have chosen not to – instead they hang yourself on the view that “...We can do that for this country, because that is the one thing we need...” . Sure! You do need to co-opt some of the youth into the army to protect you and your ilk against the rest of the youth and all the workers who take to the streets in righteous indignation to protest against your inept overnment of crony capitalism.
  • America's record is clear - it simply wants control of land (food), water, minerals and energy resources for its own benefit, plus cheap labour. Africom is there to 'command' and prop up servile local elites who will allow American multinationals to take whatever they want. Sadly many of our leaders already eagerly follow the US example of plunder for personal profit and will be happy to get a small personal share of the spoils while their people are impoverished.
Arabica Robusta

U.S. Africa Command Home - Moeletsi Mbeki - 0 views

  • African states therefore suffer from a number of important handicaps. They suffer from weak allegiance by their citizens to these states and vice versa. This explains why African countries during the past 50 years have been centres of many conflicts, in particular civil wars, inter-tribal wars, violent communal conflicts and pogroms, wars of secession, and more recently in the Great Lakes region of central Africa, attempts at genocide. These great conflicts have been accompanied by vast population movements in and out of different national boundaries. Africa, not surprisingly, is host to the largest number of refugees and internally displaced persons in the world.
  • One of the most disgraceful but under-reported scandals in Africa is the extent to which African elites export capital from the continent. According to the United Nations, nearly 40% of Africa's private wealth is kept outside Africa compared to only 3% of South Asia's private wealth and 6% of East Asia's. The small economic surplus that remains, goes to finance elite consumption and to pay for the running of the largely unaccountable state.
  • Notwithstanding what I have said about the undesirability of focusing on the military option to solve Africa's challenges, use of force to solve Africa's problems must however not be ruled out. This is why in my view the creation of the African Command by the US government was an important initiative. Africom however must not just confine itself to working with African governments only. It must also engage with non-state actors in its effort to assist in re-constructing societies which, I have argued, is a pre-condition to achieving long term security in Africa. Clearly we have a long road ahead of us, so we need to pace ourselves accordingly.
1 - 3 of 3
Showing 20 items per page