Group items tagged

"What Publish or Perish is for Publish or Perish is designed to empower individual academics to present their case for research impact to its best advantage. We would be concerned if it would be used for academic staff evaluation purposes in a mechanistic way. When using Publish or Perish for citation analyses, we would like to suggest the following general rule of thumb: If an academic shows good citation metrics, it is very likely that he or she has made a significant impact on the field. However, the reverse is not necessarily true. If an academic shows weak citation metrics, this may be caused by a lack of impact on the field, but also by one or more of the following: Working in a small field (therefore generating fewer citations in total); Publishing in a language other than English (LOTE - effectively also restricting the citation field); Publishing mainly (in) books. Although Google Scholar performs better than the Web of Science in this respect, it is still not very good in capturing LOTE articles and citations, or citations in books or book chapters. As a result, citation metrics in the Social Sciences and even more so in the Humanities will always be underestimated as in these disciplines publications in LOTE and books/book chapters are more likely than in the Sciences. "

Web search can be a remarkable tool for students, and a bit of instruction in how to search for academic sources will help your students become critical thinkers and independent learners. With the materials on this site, you can help your students become skilled searchers- whether they're just starting out with search, or ready for more advanced training.

Howard Rheingold 03 Feb 12 10:09:30 Stanford psychologist Carol Dweck conducted the groundbreaking research showing that praise intended to raise young people's self-esteem can seriously backfire. When we tell children, "You're so smart," we communicate the message that they'd better not take risks or make mistakes, lest they reveal that they're not so smart after all. Dweck calls this cautious attitude the "fixed mindset," and she's found that it's associated with greater anxiety and reduced achievement. Students with a "growth mindset," on the other hand, believe that intelligence can be expanded with hard work and persistence, and they view challenges as invigorating and even fun. They're more resilient in the face of setbacks, and they do better academically. Now Dweck has designed a program, called Brainology, which aims to help students develop a growth mindset. Its website explains: "Brainology makes this happen by teaching students how the brain functions, learns, and remembers, and how it changes in a physical way when we exercise it. Brainology shows students that they are in control of their brain and its development." That's a crucial message to pass on to children, and it's not just empty words of encouragement-it's supported by cutting-edge research on neuroplasticity, which shows that the brain changes and grows when we learn new things. You, and your child, can learn to be smarter.

So Facebook was basically used to facilitate a discussion group, which can certainly be done with an LMS like Blackboard or Moodle or with various other tools, but the nice thing about Facebook is that many students are already familiar and comfortable with it - it's a "known entity" to them. Another positive thing, which addressed a concern of mine in this environment, was that there was a 'wall' between this academic use and the personal uses students have for the tool - by being in the group you didn't have to friend anyone or expose your personal information.

"Participation and Pedagogy: Connecting the Social Web to ACRL Learning Outcomes" a University at Albany, Albany, NY This article examines the connection between ACRL information literacy standards and constructivist pedagogy. This connection is used to support use of Web 2.0 tools for information literacy instruction. Sample exercises using these tools are provided for each ACRL learning outcome, and the tools' suitability for the constructivist approach is reasserted."

"toolsforsearch Actions * New PageNew Page * Join this WikiJoin this Wiki * Recent ChangesRecent Changes * Manage WikiManage Wiki Navigation Home Blog Search Twitter Search Wiki Search Image Search Video Search People Search Government Academic Search Kids Search MakingSearchChoices Pathfinders MLA Style Sheet Research Guide Virtual Library Home Virtual Library (new) edit navigation Mrsjgarcia · My Wikis My Wikis · 1 My Mail · My Account · Help · Sign Out · wikispaces *homeEdit * pagesubmenu o Details and Tags o Print o PDF o Backlinks o Source o Delete o Rename o Redirect o Permissions o Lock * discussion * history * notify me Details last edit Sep 28, 2009 3:28 pm by joycevalenza joycevalenza - 61 revisions hide details Tags * edit * Type a tag name. Press comma or enter to add another. Cancel Edit This Page General Search Tools Google Search Engineer videos Top 100 Alternative Search Engines List CNET's Twitter Search Sites AllMyFaves (one page icon directory of search tools) * Google * Google (Advanced) * Google Directory * Google Books * Google Scholar * Google News Timeline * Google Squared (for building comparisons) * Wolfram|Alpha (computational knowledge engine) * Surchur (for searching social networks & more) * Goofram (search Google & Wolfram|Alpha together) * Search Cube (visual page search) * Yebol (semantic search) * Yahoo! * Wiki.com (for searching wikispace) * Twoogle (searches Google and Twitter simultaneously) * Cuil (offers refinement tabs and categories boxes) * Yuil (Cuil with Yahoo-power) * Buttonall (the Internet's universal remote meta-search) * Ask.com * Clusty(clustered search) * Duck Duck Go * Grokker (offers both map and cluster results) * Leapfish (combines Google, Yahoo!, MSN results)