Marx Man. /1844 and the Feudal-Capitalist transition of Eng. Rev. - 0 views

• 
  #1 Ian Schlom on 30 Nov 11

   

  pg. 62 has what human pre-capitalist relations are.
  At the top paragraph of pg. 61 Marx talks about the transition of feudal land into capitalist land. Pretty important if you're going to be talking about this transition, very helpful if you cite Marx, as if you actually looked into and studied this transition. Cuz you would have, sort of, if you did this. This paragraph also touches on the landlords and capitalists being kinda the same by the era of capitalist land reform and capitalism production. This would be for when capitalist land reform had partially been instituted, saying that these capitalist land reforms were indeed capitalist, and that their interests lied with the urban bourgeoisie, because they were advancing the same bourgeois system and they were the same bourgeoisie/bourgeois class.
  When Christopher Hill identifies the farmers using new capitalist techniques, they are indeed land capitalists (as Marx elaborates pg.61). Remember to note Hill's bias and where some of his assumptions come from.
  The pre-capitalist relations of feudalism are defined on pg. 62, so this is what I explain are pre-capitalist relations in the shift from those feudal relations to the capitalist relations. So when I talk about this, I can define what those are clearly and can cite an economist regarding this.

   

  <div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">pg. 62 has what human pre-capitalist relations are. <br /> At the top paragraph of pg. 61 Marx talks about the transition of feudal land into capitalist land. Pretty important if you're going to be talking about this transition, very helpful if you cite Marx, as if you actually looked into and studied this transition. Cuz you would have, sort of, if you did this. This paragraph also touches on the landlords and capitalists being kinda the same by the era of capitalist land reform and capitalism production. This would be for when capitalist land reform had partially been instituted, saying that these capitalist land reforms were indeed capitalist, and that their interests lied with the urban bourgeoisie, because they were advancing the same bourgeois system and they were the same bourgeoisie/bourgeois class. <br /> When Christopher Hill identifies the farmers using new capitalist techniques, they are indeed land capitalists (as Marx elaborates pg.61). Remember to note Hill's bias and where some of his assumptions come from. <br /> The pre-capitalist relations of feudalism are defined on pg. 62, so this is what I explain are pre-capitalist relations in the shift from those feudal relations to the capitalist relations. So when I talk about this, I can define what those are clearly and can cite an economist regarding this.</div>

  ...

  Cancel

To Top