Apple: Samsung copied too much even Google could not stand - 1 views

• 
  #1 lu yang on 30 Jul 12

   

  The patent dispute between Apple and Samsung next week a formal trial, although not yet a formal trial, but the two sides have begun a war of words. It is reported that Apple plans to use the Samsung contents of the file to defend, some of which File, Samsung smart phones and android tablet pcs and Apple iPhone (parameter picture sample evaluation) and iPad are surprisingly similar, it is also within the company The issue had been discussed, but has also been a clear warning of Google and other third-party companies.
  Apple said in the trial file:
  "Samsung's documents show that Samsung products with Apple products is not accidental, not Samsung's own claim that" natural evolution ", on the contrary, it is Samsung intentionally copied the result of sales of the iPhone and the iPad appearance, icon design and intuitive user interface Samsung's public statements and the contents of the file inconsistencies, Apple will be based on the file to defend. "
  Some evidence in the trial documents show, Samsung is not only interested in copying the iPhone and iPad some of the features and functionality, this bad behavior has also been a clear warning of Google and other third-party companies. The following are the some of the more persuasive view Apple excerpt from the files of the trial:
  - In February 2010, Google had explicitly told Samsung, the latter "P1" and P3 google android tablet (Galaxy Tab and Galaxy Tab 10.1) and the iPad is too similar, and requested the Samsung P3, with the iPad distinguish off.
  ung's product design team pointed out that the Galaxy S and iPhone 4S looks much like the "regrettable".
  - Samsung launched a formal assessment of some well-known designers had warned Samsung, Galaxy S "from the outside over-copied the design of the iPhone, Samsung should have its own innovation." The designers explained that the "Galaxy S is very similar appearance with the iPhone, there is no significant difference if you put the Samsung Logo on the product cover is simply a mold carved out (of course this little exaggerated, but the implication that the Galaxy S with the iPhone is too much like).
  Faced with these seemingly very convincing indictment of the Apple, Samsung, of course, will not be to admit defeat, Samsung's legal team will be how to refute it is a very interesting thing. Samsung also has some secret weapons ", for example, Apple 2006, interior design presentation files, iPhone cell phone before and after comparison chart, as well as some Apple internal e-mail, Apple's so-called" revolutionary "iPhone design from its competitors, Sony's design. Samsung claims that Apple's lawsuit is an anti-competitive behavior, it should be paid to Sony patented technology use fee, but for the patented technology, Apple can not so successful in the mobile communications industry.

   

  <div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">The patent dispute between Apple and Samsung next week a formal trial, although not yet a formal trial, but the two sides have begun a war of words. It is reported that Apple plans to use the Samsung contents of the file to defend, some of which File, Samsung smart phones and android tablet pcs and Apple iPhone (parameter picture sample evaluation) and iPad are surprisingly similar, it is also within the company The issue had been discussed, but has also been a clear warning of Google and other third-party companies. <br /> Apple said in the trial file: <br /> "Samsung's documents show that Samsung products with Apple products is not accidental, not Samsung's own claim that" natural evolution ", on the contrary, it is Samsung intentionally copied the result of sales of the iPhone and the iPad appearance, icon design and intuitive user interface Samsung's public statements and the contents of the file inconsistencies, Apple will be based on the file to defend. " <br /> Some evidence in the trial documents show, Samsung is not only interested in copying the iPhone and iPad some of the features and functionality, this bad behavior has also been a clear warning of Google and other third-party companies. The following are the some of the more persuasive view Apple excerpt from the files of the trial: <br /> - In February 2010, Google had explicitly told Samsung, the latter "P1" and P3 google android tablet (Galaxy Tab and Galaxy Tab 10.1) and the iPad is too similar, and requested the Samsung P3, with the iPad distinguish off. <br /> ung's product design team pointed out that the Galaxy S and iPhone 4S looks much like the "regrettable". <br /> - Samsung launched a formal assessment of some well-known designers had warned Samsung, Galaxy S "from the outside over-copied the design of the iPhone, Samsung should have its own innovation." The designers explained that the "Galaxy S is very similar appearance with the iPhone, there is no significant difference if you put the Samsung Logo on the product cover is simply a mold carved out (of course this little exaggerated, but the implication that the Galaxy S with the iPhone is too much like). <br /> Faced with these seemingly very convincing indictment of the Apple, Samsung, of course, will not be to admit defeat, Samsung's legal team will be how to refute it is a very interesting thing. Samsung also has some secret weapons ", for example, Apple 2006, interior design presentation files, iPhone cell phone before and after comparison chart, as well as some Apple internal e-mail, Apple's so-called" revolutionary "iPhone design from its competitors, Sony's design. Samsung claims that Apple's lawsuit is an anti-competitive behavior, it should be paid to Sony patented technology use fee, but for the patented technology, Apple can not so successful in the mobile communications industry.</div>

  ...

  Cancel

To Top