Group items tagged

In 2012, readers searching for forensic science content now have many more ways to find

relevant material.  Organized blogs devoted to forensic science have appeared that post both links and original content.  Organizations have twitter accounts and Facebook pages that make reaching readers much easier than in RSS days.

Investigators have found new DNA evidence in the murder of Peggy Hettrick, a case that was considered closed until genetic evidence freed a man who spent 10 years in prison, according to Colorado Attorney General John Suthers.The "touch DNA" tests weren't available in the late 1990s. Timothy Masters was convicted of murder in Hettrick's death in 1999, but his conviction was overturned in 2008 after defense lawyers used advanced DNA testing to uncover evidence suggesting a different suspect.The new evidence was taken from Hettrick's clothing. "We have done 'touch DNA,' and I think it has moved the ball forward. We will know more in the future," Suthers said. He wouldn't say whose DNA was found or identify the clothing on which it was found.Masters has not been exonerated in the case and remains a suspect."While we are not in a position to exonerate Tim at this time, I emphasize that he is presumed innocent and is no more a suspect than a variety of other people," Suthers said.

Cross-border co-operation on terrorism and crime will be compromised unless the UK updates the technology it uses for DNA profiling, experts have warned.

Using EU recommended markers Not using recommended markers Dat

Experts also say that the "chemistry" that underlies DNA testing kits used by UK forensic science labs is now more than a decade old and that newer, more sensitive systems can obtain results from even low quality samples - improving success rates. Some argue that such information can potentially make or break a case.

The first technique of genetic engineering, the plasmid method, is the most familiar technique of the three, and is generally used for altering microorganisms such as bacteria. In the plasmid method, a small ring of DNA called a plasmid (generally found in bacteria) is placed in a container with special restriction enzymes that cut the DNA at a certain recognizable sequence. The same enzyme is then used to treat the DNA sequence to be engineered into the bacteria; this procedure creates "sticky ends" that will fuse together if given the opportunity. Next, the two separate cut-up DNA sequences are introduced into the same container, where the sticky ends allow them to fuse, thus forming a ring of DNA with additional content. new enzymes are added to help cement the new linkages, and the culture is then separated by molecular weight. Those molecules that weigh the most have successfully incorporated the new DNA, and they are to be preserved. The next step involves adding the newly formed plasmids to a culture of live bacteria with known genomes, some of which will take up the free-floating plasmids and begin to express them. In general, the DNA introduced into the plasmid will include not only instructions for making a protein, but also antibiotic-resistance genes. These resistance genes can then be used to separate the bacteria which have taken up the plasmid from those that have not. The scientist simply adds the appropriate antibiotic, and the survivors are virtually guaranteed (barring spontaneous mutations) to possess the new genes.

Next, the scientist allows the successfully altered bacteria to grow and reproduce. They can now be used in experiments or put to work in industry. Furthermore, the bacteria can be allowed to evolve on their own, with a "selection pressure" provided by the scientist for producing more protein. Because of the power of natural selection, the bacteria produced after many generations will outperform the best of the early generations. Many people strongly object to the plasmid method of genetic engineering because they fear that the engineered plasmids will be transferred into other bacteria which would cause problems if they expressed the gene. Lateral gene transfer of this type is indeed quite common in bacteria, but in general the bacteria engineered by this method do not come in contact with natural bacteria except in controlled laboratory conditions. Those bacteria that will be used in the wild - for example, those that could clean up oil spills - are generally released for a specific purpose and in a specific area, and they are carefully supervised by scientists.

What is a Clone

In biology, a clone is a cell or an organism that is genetically identical to another cell or organism.

How was Dolly Created? Dolly is different. She was generated from a specialized adult cell, not from an unspecialized embryonic cell.

As long as Animal cloning can offer medical benefits it should be investigated.

Cloning is stupid, sick, selfish and evil. There is no need for anyone to exploit animals for greed of humans.

I have absolutely no problem with animal cloning; it is a necessary step in the evolution of human welfare.

some Brazilian biologists are pushing a more controversial idea: They want to save endangered species by cloning them.

The project is still in its infancy,

and no cloned jaguars or tamarins will likely be born anytime soon.

Using a newly applied scientific technique, researchers at the Keck School of Medicine of USC have reached surprising findings about the role of nature versus nurture in the development of the neural circuits in the auditory cortex, the area of the brain responsible for processing information about sound.

Recent advances in forensic DNA testing are now paving the way for reforming the manner by which cases are resolved in courts of law through the way suspected offenders are apprehended during a criminal investigation. Firstly, the availability of new markers which are more variable across different populations, adds to the increased power of discrimination once more genetic markers are used. From the time when DNA testing only involved seven to nine genetic markers to evaluate if crime scene evidence matches a suspect’s profile, as well as to determine relationships, to the current battery of 21 autosomal markers and 23 male-specific markers, the capacity of DNA profiling to differentiate individuals has increased significantly. The use of automated and expert systems for large-scale analysis has also been found to reduce manual errors and to increase output per unit time. The use of several dyes in a single multiplex system provides more information from the same amount of genetic material compared to reactions targeting only one genetic marker but requiring the same amount of DNA that was common in the early 1990s.