Skip to main content

Home/ 28 USC § 1782/ Group items tagged 2006

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Lars Bauer

Asking for Help: Judicial Assistance in Foreign Discovery under 28 U.S.C. § 1... - 0 views

  •  
    Überblick über Voraussetzungen und Verfahren (2006)
Lars Bauer

Pendulum swings in section 1782 cases? | by Kyriaki Karadelis, Global Arbitration Revie... - 0 views

  •  
    A 2006 ruling prompted an uptick in requests to US courts under section 1782 but now the tide could be reversing, as three courts take the view arbitral panels don't qualify for evidentiary help.
Lars Bauer

Legal Overview - How Foreign Litigants May Obtain American Discovery For Use In Their H... - 0 views

  • Williams Industrial Services, LLC v. Steel Equipment Corp., CA NO: 2:08-MC-179-AJS (W.D. Pa. June 24, 2008).
  • III. The Application of §1782 to Private International Arbitration
  • Subsequent to the Supreme Court’s decision in Intel, various courts have granted §1782 discovery in aid of private arbitral matters. In In re Hallmark Capital Corp., the court granted discovery for use in a private Israeli arbitration proceeding. By its Order dated September 13, 2007 denying the discovery target’s motion for reconsideration, the court bypassed National Broadcasting by relying upon Intel’s rejection of restrictive definitional exclusions.39 In In re Application Roz Trading, the court granted an application requesting the production of documents for use before an arbitral panel of the International Arbitral Centre of the Austrian Federal Economic Chamber in Vienna.40 In Williams Industrial Services, LLC v. Steel Equipment Corp., in the absence of opposition the court granted document discovery for use in a private arbitration matter before the International Chamber of Commerce in Paris, France.41
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • 40In re Application Roz Trading, 469 F. Supp. 2d 1221 (N.D.Ga. 2006); 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2112 (N.D.Ga. 2007) (Denying request for stay pending appeal.) On June 4, 2008 the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals granted the appellant Coca-Cola’s motion to dismiss its appeal with prejudice.
  • 41Williams Industrial Services, LLC v. Steel Equipment Corp., CA NO: 2:08-MC-179-AJS (W.D. Pa. June 24, 2008).
  •  
    Marks & Sokolov Article | United States Law Office Philadelphia Pennsylvania | Russian Law Office Moscow | Ukraine Law Office Kyiv
1 - 4 of 4
Showing 20 items per page