I am not assigned to review your project, but it is really good. You have provided a great application but even more useful for me a great summary of essential items covered in our course. Thanks!

NETS goals are clearly stated and directly relate to network learning environments. Content is appropriate for targeted audience which is clearly identified.

The project is completely appropriate for its intended goals but only briefly capitalizes on learner to learner interaction via the Voice Thread. Having the participants reflect on other participant reflections via Google Docs might foster greater connectivity.

A pre and post measure of effectiveness is not included. The post survey is good to gauge how the participants felt the training was in regard to their learning, but it is not measured against a measurable goal.

The content chosen involved learning how to use Wetpaint to work collaboratively and integrating it in a PLE environment assist in management. The content is appropriate for the targeted audience, but a pre-survey should be offered as target audience may have prior knowledge or expertise that should be taken into account

The targeted audience appears to be fourth graders. The content seems to detailed for that particular age group. Second language learners will have great difficulty going through this intended lesson. Network learning environment is clearly being utilized.

This project seems very intensive for the age group targeted. Professional development of a targeted audience is never addressed. The unit of work is an example of grade 4 technology integration which holds value but does not address the objectives of this assignment. Using this a part of your project with clearier goals and your target audience would make the link more pronounced.

I like your voice thread reflecito. It reall gets your participants to learn form each other. Evaluation and perhaps a post survery would be helpful.

Your goals are very timely for your school I am sure! An evaluatio piece on how effecive your endeavor should be included.

What a great feature, to be able to add captions. I see your application but this could also be helpful for language learners. Some sort of eveluation and post survey should be included. We only had to complete 3 lessons, but I think this was expected at least the evaluation part.

I like activity 3 but could you then get learner to learner reflection of some sort to really stress the social apsect of the Web 2.0 tool you are using?

A very noble cause! The Youtube video is very engaging. I believe and evauation of your network plan should be included.

Great interacive application that really promotes reflection. The ability to send it back to the 'expert' for comment could add a nice bit of learning in which the student group could further comment/refelct as a final task.

Great application! To add additional reflection if the 'expert' agrees, consider sending the group project to the expert for comment. The student group can then refelct on the comments to add greater meaning.

If the students can interact with eachother while conducting the interview, I think this would be interactive not expository. Seems like a great application.

Wouldn't this be interative as learner to learner collaboration is allowed?

I see now that both my applications would fit into interacive as learner to learner interaction is ivolved.

I see now this is interactive as Etherpad allows learners to directly exchange ideas between each other while interacting with content.