Also, a lot of [cartographers] don’t want to acknowledge any complicity with the way things are, and maps have a huge deal to do with the way things are. They want to pretend their hands are clean: maps are just a tool. But you can do bad things with a tool and you can go good things with a tool. I’ve been suggesting to the hardest-edged people of all that they could put their epistemological and ontological arguments on a really firm foundation by simply acknowledging the fact that they are making the world. And they recoil from that, viscerally and instinctively, as they continue to make the software that enables them to make the world. In explicit terms, some of the most brilliant analyses of how maps do what they do have been carried out by these people who are basically building machines to make maps. When someone drops a bomb on something and kills a bunch of kids, and they do that using a map that you made, you either accept the responsibility for it—a kind of well, you can’t make an omelet without breaking some eggs responsibility—or you say, “Damn it, I can’t do this anymore.”
Neighborhood Narratives - 0 views
Aesthetic Events in Occupation | by Elyse Mallouk | Art Practical - 0 views
NIMBY and housing crisis in Sydney - 1 views
Urban Planning - Forum Sydney - 1 views
1More
In the favelas on the frontline of protest, Brazilians ask: who is this World Cup for? - 1 views
Dignity Barricade | Beto Shwafaty - 0 views
Mapping Emergence | Drawing Research Network - 1 views
Fixing politics: the housing affordability crisis | Crikey - 0 views
5More
Intervention - The Right against the city | AntipodeFoundation.org - 0 views
1More
6 star dreams and industrial wasted-land | Urban Design Blog on WordPress.com - 0 views
« First
‹ Previous
261 - 280
Next ›
Last »
Showing 20▼ items per page