Group items matching
in title, tags, annotations or urlCreate Your Own @font-face Kits | Font Squirrel - 3 views
Elusive-Icons Webfont | shoestrap.org - 0 views
Google Web Fonts - 1 views
Google Font Directory - 0 views
@font-face gotchas « Paul Irish - 1 views
-
There are a few reasons why smiley is a better solution: Webkit+Font Management software can mess up local references, like turning glyphs into A blocks. (crbug.com/33173) On OS X, Font Management software may alter system settings to show a dialog when trying to access a local() font that's accessible outside of Library/Fonts. More detail on my bulletproof post. (crbug.com/29729) Font Explorer X is also known to mess up other stuff in Firefox: bugzil.la/531771 Although it's unlikely, you could reference a local() font which is completely different than what you think it is. (Typophile post on different fonts, same name) At the very least its a risk, and you're ceding control of the type to both the browser and host machine. This risk may not be worth the benefit of avoiding the font download. These are all pretty edge case issues, but it's worth considering. FontSquirrel has already made the smiley syntax the new default in the Generator, and you should use it going forward as well.
-
And.. regarding @font-face syntax I now recommend the bulletproof smiley variation over the original bulletproof syntax.
-
@font-face { font-family: 'Graublau Web'; src: url('GraublauWeb.eot'); src: local('?'), url('GraublauWeb.woff') format('woff'), url('GraublauWeb.ttf') format('truetype'); }
- ...5 more annotations...
-
"There are a few reasons why smiley is a better solution: Webkit+Font Management software can mess up local references, like turning glyphs into A blocks. (crbug.com/33173) On OS X, Font Management software may alter system settings to show a dialog when trying to access a local() font that's accessible outside of Library/Fonts. More detail on my bulletproof post. (crbug.com/29729) Font Explorer X is also known to mess up other stuff in Firefox: bugzil.la/531771 Although it's unlikely, you could reference a local() font which is completely different than what you think it is. (Typophile post on different fonts, same name) At the very least its a risk, and you're ceding control of the type to both the browser and host machine. This risk may not be worth the benefit of avoiding the font download. These are all pretty edge case issues, but it's worth considering. FontSquirrel has already made the smiley syntax the new default in the Generator, and you should use it going forward as well. "
A List Apart: Topics: Design - 0 views
10 Cool Fonts That You Should Use - Neat Designs - 7 views
-
Typography resource: 10 Cool Fonts that You Should Use @neatdesignsblog | http://t.co/TClqrdxB
The Ultimate Guide to Golden Ratio Typography - 0 views
-
The mathematical proportions of your typography are vitally important to how readers perceive both your site and your content.
-
Font size and line height are proportionally related.
-
For any font size, the line height must increase as the line width increases.
- ...1 more annotation...
Google Font Preview - 9 views
30 Top Best Free Fonts From 2010 | Creative Nerds - 0 views
Google Web Fonts - 0 views
Web typographers: embrace technical constraints! | Feature | .net magazine - 0 views
-
At MyFonts, our webfont kit builder has a handy style linking tool, which enables you to specify which font to associate with <em> and <strong> tags.
1 - 15 of 15
Showing 20▼ items per page