The 3 Facebook Settings Every User Should Check Now
function getSharePasskey() { return 'ex=1421730000&en=3377c52164e5c387&ei=5124';}
function getShareURL() {
return encodeURIComponent('http://www.nytimes.com/external/readwriteweb/2010/01/20/20readwriteweb-the-3-facebook-settings-every-user-should-c-29287.html');
}
function getShareHeadline() {
return encodeURIComponent('The 3 Facebook Settings Every User Should Check Now');
}
function getShareDescription() {
return encodeURIComponent(' In December, a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/fa');
}
function getShareKeywords() {
return encodeURIComponent('');
}
function getShareSection() {
return encodeURIComponent('technology');
}
function getShareSectionDisplay() {
return encodeURIComponent('Technology');
}
function getShareSubSection() {
return encodeURIComponent('');
}
function getShareByline() {
return encodeURIComponent('By SARAH PEREZ of ReadWriteWeb ');
}
function getSharePubdate() {
return encodeURIComponent('January 20, 2010');
}
Sign in to Recommend Twitter
Sign In to E-Mail
Print
By SARAH PEREZ of ReadWriteWeb
Published: January 20, 2010
In December, Facebook made a series of bold and controversial changes regarding the nature of its users' privacy on the social networking site. The company once known for protecting privacy to the point of exclusivity (it began its days as a network for college kids only - no one else even had access), now seemingly wants to compete with more open social networks like the microblogging media darling Twitter.
Skip to next paragraph
More News From ReadWriteWeb
2010 Trend: Sensors & Mobile Phones
Why Facebook Is Wrong: Privacy Is Still Important
Nexus One and Android 2.1: Apple Better Watch Out
Open Thread: Should Tech Get a Turn-Off?
How The Web Is Transforming Personal Finance
Those of you who edited your privacy settings prior to December's change have nothing to worry about - that is, assuming you elected to keep your personalized settings when prompted by Facebook's "transition tool." The tool, a dialog box explaining the changes, appeared at the top of Facebook homepages this past month with its own selection of recommended settings. Unfortunately, most Facebook users likely opted for the recommended settings without really understanding what they were agreeing to. If you did so, you may now be surprised to find that you inadvertently gave Facebook the right to publicize your private information including status updates, photos, and shared links. Want to change things back? Read on to find out how.
Giovanni Cerri on 28 Apr 09Looking for the best way to drive a massive amount of traffic to my site and my blog, I've recently stumbled upon a very interesting article about Craigslist. I've always been considering it a very primitive website, as far as the design is concerned. However, Craigslist ranks among the 25 most visited sites of the world (Alexa.com traffic rankings, april 2009) and without any doubt it's the most important classified ads platform worldwide. I know that Google Adwords is very effective, other similar advertising programs are good too, but what if we could produce the same amount of traffic (or even more) using Craigslist for free? The idea is creating an appealing advertisement (with a link pointing to our website) and posting it in multiple sections of Craigslist corresponding to the major cities of the world (highly populated cities such as New York, Los Angeles, London, Tokyo, Hong Kong, etc.). This will certainly produce a massive traffic flow. The problem is that if we post the same ad (or similar ads) in multiple cities, all our ads will be detected by Craigslist spiderbots and deleted by the staff. Even if we offer serious products we will be considered spammers, and if we insist, we will be banned .... ..... and this will happen unless we use the method discovered by Steve Mount to avoid being detected by the spiderbots and to avoid being deleted. Follow the link to read more .....
