Group items tagged

Positional paper by Alan Gilchrist (2007) considering whether Web 2.0 can be used within organisations and their intranets. Paper covers a number of interesting points about Web 2.0.

[Reference also in the Web2.0 Wiki]
Well presented video by Professor Michael Wesch lookign at Web 2.0 from a point of view including how the web has changed from HTML to XML the differences, how this has helped mash-ups and changing the online community.

Full article by Tracy Caldwell (Jan 2007) referred to by Charles Crook looking at JISC's work looking at Web 2.0 and some of the issues raised such as the ease of copying and pasting and the subsequent potential or actual infringement of intellectual property rights or copyrights.

Interesting video response made to the YouTube video "Web 2.0 ... The Machine is Us/ing Us" by Michael Wesch. Discussion centres around the internet in reality just being written text or video being transmitted. What participation there is, is created to simulate real life social interaction and heading for a virtual reality.

[This authors note: However, IMHO this misses the point that it is not the web adapting to us, but us adapting to the tools the internet can provide. The tools were not designed to mimick natural interaction. The web seems to be heading along two paths of interaction and collaboration. a) Those tools which build on current paterns of collaboration and interaction, eg email, wiki's, Google Docs, Vyew.com and are developing further to enahnce this collaboration, eg incorporation of calendars into email, calendar sharing, mash ups, etc, but in essence refining and building on the skills we acquired to use these forms of internet communication. The other direction the web appears to be taking is trying to imitate reality or augment reality such as Second Life. The issue here is that social interaction in reality occurs on so many different levels with different channels of communication, such as verbal and non verbal communications (verbal nuances, tone, body language, facial expression, physical limitations) which for true reality need to be replicated and for others to be able react to them. Of course mentioning physical limitations opens a whole new can of worms, but an exmple is how would we react if in real life we could always see somebody waving to us from over a mile away or more? Another example is how does a partially sighted or sight impaired individual respond to visual signals given on the web? Can it be done? yes, but should it?]

Links to actual interview in MP3 or OGG. Notes about the subjects are covered, eg new digital divide between those able to search and those who don't know how to. Belief in creating smaller class sizes rather than spending on educational technology. Possible interactions between Web 2.0, large companies and open source software.

Academic media course on journalism - critical view of Web 2.0. Lots of interesting looking refs. Via Google "crowdsourcing & education"

Link to full text article (via Science Direct) by Cath Everett 2007 regarding identity and access management.

Comment in the New Scientist about potential knock-on effects of a patent awarded to Yahoo! that allows users to customise a webpage template to display data drawn from other sources.

Ideas of how to use Social Bookmarking in teaching plans

Interesting article in the BBC Online about an aspect of social networking sites and young people leaving details they would not like employers or potential employers to view.