Skip to main content

Home/ Vitamin D/ Group items tagged paradigms

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Matti Narkia

Vitamin D Newsletter Dec 2005 | Paradigms and Paradoxes - Vitamin D and Cardiovascular ... - 0 views

  •  
    Paradigms and Paradoxes Last month Dr. Armin Zittermann of Ruhr University, Germany, published the best vitamin D paper of the month. He reviewed the mounting evidence that vitamin D deficiency is a major cause of heart disease. Zittermann A, Schleithoff SS, Koerfer R. Putting cardiovascular disease and vitamin D insufficiency into perspective. Br J Nutr. 2005 Oct;94(4):483-92. Before we start, let's talk about paradigms and paradoxes. A paradigm is a set of assumptions, concepts, and practices that constitutes a way of viewing reality. The current paradigm is that heart disease is caused by a combination of genetics, hypertension, diabetes, cholesterol, smoking, obesity, inactivity, and diet. A paradox is a fact that contradicts the paradigm.
Matti Narkia

The clinical importance of vitamin D (cholecalciferol): a paradigm shift with implicati... - 0 views

  •  
    The clinical importance of vitamin D (cholecalciferol): a paradigm shift with implications for all healthcare providers. Vasquez A, Manso G, Cannell J. Altern Ther Health Med. 2004 Sep-Oct;10(5):28-36; quiz 37, 94. Review. PMID: 15478784
Matti Narkia

Vitamin D, Nutritional Deficiency, and the Medical Paradigm -- Heaney 88 (11): 5107 -- ... - 0 views

  •  
    Vitamin D, nutritional deficiency, and the medical paradigm. Heaney RP. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Nov;88(11):5107-8. Review. No abstract available. PMID: 14602734
Matti Narkia

Current Impediments to Acceptance of the Ultraviolet-B-Vitamin D-Cancer Hypothesis - An... - 0 views

  •  
    Current impediments to acceptance of the ultraviolet-B-vitamin D-cancer hypothesis. Grant WB, Boucher BJ. Anticancer Res. 2009 Sep;29(9):3597-604. PMID: 19667154 The ultraviolet-B (UVB)-vitamin D-cancer hypothesis was proposed in 1980. There have been numerous ecological, observational and other studies of the hypothesis. There are about 14 types of cancer for which it seems to apply: bladder, breast, colon, endometrial, esophageal, gallbladder, gastric, ovarian, pancreatic, rectal, renal and vulvar cancer and both Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Nonetheless, the hypothesis has not yet been accepted by public health agencies. Some of the reasons for this include a distrust of ecological studies, some mistrust of observational studies, and the existence of just one positive randomized controlled trial, an analysis of a vitamin D and calcium supplementation study involving post-menopausal women in Nebraska. Paradigm shifts such as this generally take time, in part due to opposition from those content with the status quo. In this paper, results of ecological studies in the United States using summertime solar UVB as the index of vitamin D production, which is highly asymmetrical with respect to latitude, and indices for other cancer risk-modifying factors (air pollution, alcohol consumption, dietary iron and zinc, ethnic background, socioeconomic status, smoking and urban/rural residence) are discussed in terms of supporting the hypothesis. These studies were not considered while other ecological studies were examined in recent critiques of the hypothesis. While additional randomized controlled trials would, of course, be helpful, the current evidence seems to satisfy the criteria for causality as outlined by A. Bradford Hill.
1 - 4 of 4
Showing 20 items per page