In order to coach the transition process of change, technological or otherwise, administrators need to familiarize themselves with this process. I hope you find the information useful.

As I read this information about TPACK it seems like deja vu. I'm confused. Is this a method, idea or guideline to technology integration?

This is what I get...TPACK emphasises the connectivity of technology, pedagogy and content. What I don't get is the "how to" and "the part I play." The article is quite detailed about the "how to" of TPACK but is also very confusing. However, other articles seems to ramble on about the "what is" of TPACK. How does this model add to what we already know about technology integration? OR Is it just structuring what we already know about technology integration? What is the fundamental thought behind the concept of TPACK?

The TPACK developmental model on slide 13 has similiarities to Bloom's Taxonomy.

Teachers who exhibit best practices with technology are "creative, flexible, and adapt ways in which they navigate the constraints, affordances, and interactions within TPACK framework. (Mishra & Koehler, 2008)." Dr. Becker, Is this the method to your madness?

This brief video graphically introduces the idea of TPACK. Take a glimps.

This article make a profound connection which evoked intrinsic reflection on my part. It's simplicity, coupled with these conection makes this piece of advice true no matter what we are planning for. "Sometimes, one of the key elements-a key tool-in the planner's arsenal is pure, simple honesty. This means that planners must commit themselves to shed any defensive feelings they might have, or be threatened to adopt, as they examine their particular situation. True, sustainable growth comes from facing the honest reality of a condition, then working together to build a strategy for guaranteed success." (L.S. Anderson, 1999) National Center for Technology Planning Hence, technology planning is more than computers, it's a way of life.

In this synopsis, the core elements are presented in a contradictory order to the former post I made, with some phases eliminated. This begets these questions. Is there a distinct order? Which is the order and which is the idea?

Technology planning has transended the straightforward process which was characterized by a task force which determined the what, when, where and who of the plan and the assumption that an implicit map from points A to B is the pinnacle of implementation. They now emphasize characteristics that help to coach and manage transitions. At the heart of such is communication which emphasizes communication with and concern for the implementers. In my opinion, this plan emphasises such as it reorganizes the planning process to consider vital aspects of the planning process that many tend to side step- Planning to plan and communication.

A refreshing visit to the library to read classic children's literature. Every parent and teacher should "favorite" this link!!

A great graphic aid of "learning machines" from the 17th century to present. The most interesting anology is that of the IPad and the slate. Technology making a 360!!