Skip to main content

Home/ All Things TOK/ Group items tagged culture

Rss Feed Group items tagged

anonymous

BBC News - Language universality idea tested with biology method - 1 views

  •  
    "A long-standing idea that human languages share universal features that are dictated by human brain structure has been cast into doubt. A study reported in Nature has borrowed methods from evolutionary biology to trace the development of grammar in several language families. The results suggest that features shared across language families evolved independently in each lineage. The authors say cultural evolution, not the brain, drives language development. At the heart of both studies is a method based on what are known as phylogenetic studies."
anonymous

Beautycheck - characteristics of beautiful faces - 0 views

  •  
    "What is it that makes a face look beautiful? What are the differences between very attractive and less appealing faces? For every historical period and every human culture, people have always had their own ideal of beauty. But this ideal has never been constant and is still subject to changes. In our research project we adopted an empirical approach and created prototypes for unattractive and attractive faces for each sex by using the morphing technique. For example, the prototype for an unattractive face ("unsexy face") was created by blending together four faces that had previously been rated as very unattractive. The "sexy face" was created by blending together four of the most attractive faces, respectively (see report). In order to find out the characteristic differences between attractive and unattractive faces, we presented pairs of one "sexy" and one "unsexy" image for both sexes to test subjects. The task was to report which facial features were perceived to be different between the two faces. For the results see the list below. "
anonymous

Comedians can say 'mong' on TV, rules Ofcom - Telegraph - 0 views

  •  
    "Speaking about Britain's Got Talent singer Susan Boyle in October, he said :"She would not be where she is today if it wasn't for the fact that she looked like such a ******* mong." Mong is a slang term used to refer to people with Down's Syndrome. It is derived from the word "mongrel." He went on: "When she first came on the telly, I went: 'Is that a mong?' "I don't mean she has Down's Syndrome, by the way. No, no! That would be offensive. That word doesn't mean that any more." Channel 4 claimed that using the word was justified in the context of late-night humour. It said the comment was not "directed at Susan Boyle as having a disability but at those who refuse to acknowledge that meanings of words can adapt over time". The company said it needed to experiment and defended the entertainer's right to freedom of expression. Ofcom said in its ruling that Gervais was exploring the interpretations and meanings of certain provocative words. He was examining the changes in their associations over time, with a focus on his assertion that the word "mong" had lost its derogatory association with Down's Syndrome. The regulator said: "This involved Ricky Gervais evoking the word's offensiveness to some extent, and challenging the relationship between the offence and the word itself. "We considered, therefore, that the nature and focus of the routine provided a clear editorial context for his use of the term." "
anonymous

Zakaria: China strategy is to wait out Dalai Lama - CNN.com - 0 views

  • Why is Tibet such a hot-button issue for China?
    • anonymous
       
      Here is the guiding question. Why is this issue not resolved one way or another?
  • So who's right?
    • anonymous
       
      Really, so how do we know who is right?
  • And Tibetans see
    • anonymous
       
      And the Tibetans have a different perspective. Notice how the basic assumptions of their approaches don't match. China is in a power and control paradigm and Tibet is in a cultural preservation paradigm.
  • ...11 more annotations...
  • China sees the issue
    • anonymous
       
      China has one perspective...
  • It's not so simple
    • anonymous
       
      If the issue is ongoing, it's always because it's never "so simple."
  • he Chinese have claimed
    • anonymous
       
      A knowledge claim.
  • The Tibetans, however, reject that claim
    • anonymous
       
      A counterclaim...
  • Well, that depends on who you ask.
    • anonymous
       
      Great TOK answer.
  • However
    • anonymous
       
      Telltale "counter-claim" transitional word. Whenever you see "however" someone is raising a point that contradicts the one previously mentioned.
  • Why hasn't there been any resolution?
    • anonymous
       
      Again, restating the original driving question.
  • Will it work?
    • anonymous
       
      Prediction based on hypothetical futures. If the Chinese do _________ then ________. HOWEVER... If the Tibetans do ________ then _________.
  • Do you think
    • anonymous
       
      Now comes personal opinion. Now that the issues, past and present have been aired, what does Zakaria think of it all.
  • What's the stumbling block that keeps them from finding resolution?
    • anonymous
       
      Again, returning over and over again to the guiding question. What is the stumbling block? Why isn't this solved already?
  • the difference in perception between the two sides
    • anonymous
       
      Here is the root issue...a problem of perception between the two groups. The one warning here, is that "perception" here is not used in exactly the way it is used in TOK as a Way of Knowing, as in sense perception.
  •  
    A great little interview on the current situation between China and Tibet and why it remains unresolved. Outlines knowledge issues and current problems well for TOK oral presentations.
anonymous

EDGE 3rd Culture: Animal Minds - 0 views

  •  
    "Harvard evolutionary psychologist, Marc D. Hauser, argues that to understand what animals think and what they feel, we must ask about the kinds of selection pressures which shaped their minds and see the creature for what it is, no more, no less. Using the tools of evolutionary biology, linguistics, neuroscience, and cognitive science, he asks questions such as Why can't animals be taught to speak? How do animals find their way home in the dark? Do animals lie or feel guilty? Do they enjoy sex? Why were emotions designed into animal systems? Why are certain emotions universal and others highly specialized? "
‹ Previous 21 - 25 of 25
Showing 20 items per page