Skip to main content

Home/ ThesisPolitics/ Group items tagged canadian

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Shantastic Marie

History of Education - The Canadian Encyclopedia - 0 views

  • The history of education is a central theme in Canada's social, economic and political history
  • In the 17th century education was usually an informal process in which skills and values were passed from one generation to the next by parents, relatives and older siblings
  • The Canadian insistence on the collective concerns of peace, order and good government has meant that state projects such as schooling are seen in terms of their overall impact on society
  • ...14 more annotations...
  • In the years after the Conquest of 1759-60, the British authorities were exceedingly concerned about the strong French Canadian presence in the colony, and they tried repeatedly to assist in the establishment of schools that were outside the control of religious authorities. These efforts were undermined by the Catholic Church and, more importantly, by the disinterest of local communities, in which education was associated more with households than classrooms
  • The establishment of school systems across Canada during the 19th century followed a strikingly similar form and chronology due to the complex and often competing ambitions of both official educators and parents
  • proposals for a public school system
  • The characteristic conviction of the school promoters was that mass schooling could be an effective instrument for instilling appropriate modes of thought and behaviour into children; in their minds, the purpose of mass schooling did not primarily involve the acquisition of academic knowledge. School systems were designed to solve a wide variety of problems ranging from crime to poverty, and from idleness to vagrancy
  • leaders in a variety of communities in central British North America took up arms in pursuit of coherent demands for political change
  • The key element of family reproduction is its orientation toward the future, including considerable anxiety about the direction and pace of social and economic change. This anxiety has involved a fear of downward social mobility both intra- and intergenerationally. Certainly, such fear preoccupied families before the 19th century and explains why land was characteristically seen as the central component of material stability and family cohesion in both New France and British America. And, during the 19th century, land continued to be seen as the most secure foundation for family economies
  • However, the development of agrarian, merchant and industrial capitalism heightened perceptions of economic insecurity. Everyone became aware that while great fortunes could be made, they could also be lost just as quickly. The obvious insecurity of even well-paying jobs or successful businesses came to loom increasingly large in the minds of parents planning for their children as well as themselves as elders in the context of declining land availability.
  • One response was to have fewer children and to invest more in their education
  • Compulsory attendance legislation was passed in the Canadian provinces (except Québec) during the later 19th century but only a minority of parents were not already enrolling their children in class.
  • Some resistance to schooling did develop, particularly from those reluctant to pay extra taxes
  • Why many parents believed that schooling would improve the prospects of their children was primarily connected to the value attributed to academic training. Unlike the emphasis of school promoters on character formation, the shaping of values, the inculcation of political and social attitudes, and proper behaviour, many parents supported schooling because they wanted their children to learn to read, write and do arithmetic.
  • articulation of schooling with the labour market
  • By the late 20th century, schooling had become part of an institutional network which included hospitals, businesses, prisons and welfare agencies.
  • growth of formal instruction funded by taxes and supervised by the state. This growth resulted from concern about cultural, moral and political behaviour, from the emergence of a wage-labour economy, from changing concepts of childhood and the family, and from the general reorganization of society into institutions.
Shantastic Marie

Politics - The Globe and Mail - 0 views

  • NDP leadership hopeful Nathan Cullen wants wealthy Canadians and corporations — particularly oil and gas companies — to pay more taxes.The British Columbia MP is proposing to create a new tax bracket for individuals earning $300,000 or more.And he's calling for a new corporate tax rate of 25 per cent for oil and gas companies.
  • reverse recent corporate tax cuts, raising the tax rate to 20 per cent from the current 15 per cent
  • need to raise revenue and promoting a healthy climate for business
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • Mr. Topp has proposed creating a new 35 per cent tax bracket for individuals earning more than $250,000. And he's called for rolling back the corporate tax rate to 22 per cent
  • get the balance right
  • proceeds into incentives to support Canada's flagging manufacturing sector, another third into post-secondary education and the rest into general revenues
  • attempt to reap some broader, cross-country benefits from Canada's non-renewable energy industry before the resources run out
  • He accused the Harper government of living “in a fantasy world where the golden goose will be forever.”“Right now, we're being irresponsible. It's a wild West attitude.”
  •  
    "NDP's Cullen pitches higher taxes for rich Canadians, oil companies "
Shantastic Marie

Perspectives on Labour and Income: High-income Canadians - 0 views

  •  
    StatsCan High Income Canadians
Shantastic Marie

Occupy movement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - 0 views

  • Occupy Wall Street was initiated by the Canadian activist group Adbusters
Shantastic Marie

Income Inequality Reframe: The 99% « Framed In Canada - 0 views

  • Occupy Wall Street is shining new light on the question of how to frame income inequality.
  • growinggap.ca project
  • income inequality elicited many and varied response
  • ...23 more annotations...
  • ambiguous
  • gap between the rich and poor
  • couldn’t identify with the rich
  • preventing them from identifying with the poor
  • Rather than see the rise of the richest and the misfortunes of the poorest as a product of a larger system that treats people differently – unfairly – five years ago, the Canadians in our focus groups saw the problem of systemic poverty from an individualistic standpoint
  • struggles of the middle class trying to keep afloat
  • talking about it in terms of the rich and the poor was an unconscious form of ‘othering’
  • And so we shifted the frame, focusing the lens on the gap between the rich and the rest of us
  • systemic problem of poverty
  • show how much the majority of Canadians have in common when it comes to income inequality – that it’s a systemic problem which affects us all
  • inequality heightens social tensions and threatens the health and vibrancy of our democracy
  • Five years and a worldwide recession later (a recession caused by irresponsible financial schemes hatched by a handful of bankers and traders on Wall Street), social unrest has been slowly unfolding
  • Arab Spring
  • G20 protests
  • Occupy Wall Street
  • fed up with a system that has wildly rewarded the richest one per cent while 99 per cent of Americans grapple with a Great Recession whose impact doesn’t seem to be letting up
  • They are showing us they are ready to stare down powerful corporate interests that prevent America from dealing with its serious fiscal and social issues.
  • large groups of citizens taking to the street
  • viewed by the establishment as anarchy
  • threat to rule of law or radical
  • hard limits of the kind of post-9/11 authoritarian constraints on perfectly law-abiding citizens who simply demand their right to be seen and heard. The 99 per cent, the new income inequality frame, has been ignored by governments of all levels, in far too many countries, for far too long.
  • The Wall Street occupants are showing us that when the system isn’t working for the 99 per cent, something is dangerously wrong with our democracy
  • new frame with which to view income inequality in North America: it is about the 99 per cent. It isn’t about individuals or individual failure. It’s about a system that’s failing the vast majority of citizens who believe things can be better than this.
Shantastic Marie

FAST FACTS: Connecting the Dots | Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives - 0 views

  • rise in attention being paid to the growing poverty and inequality in Canada
  • The Occupy movement can be credited for much of the recent attention but it is the data being released by mainstream institutions and ‘think tanks’ that have made it politically acceptable to challenge the dismal reality. Most recent is the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) report Divided We Stand: Why Inequality Keeps Rising (Dec. 2011). It shines a spotlight on the growing inequality in OECD countries, including Canada, which is shown to have income inequality above the OECD average
  • significant coming from the OECD
  • ...11 more annotations...
  • recognition that significant change is in order
  • economic policies are at the root of the problem. The report acknowledges that the policies that have given us an increasingly low-wage economy, inequitable tax policies and a shrinking social safety net are not serving us well
  • OECD appears to be realizing
  • For the OECD, this is a major shift in thinking
  • Neoliberalism was supposed to make the world a better place for us all.
  • The OECD Jobs study had a significant influence on policy reforms in Canada through the 1990s, many of which were first outlined in the Liberal government’s 1994 policy paper Agenda, Jobs and Growth. This document provided the template for a restructuring of social policy in Canada throughout the 1990s – a template that continues to guide policy today.
  • “Canada spends less on cash benefits such as unemployment benefits and family benefits than most OECD countries. Partly as a result, taxes and transfers do not reduce inequality by as much as in many other countries. Furthermore, their effect on inequality has been declining over time.”
  • “publicly provided services fulfill an important direct redistributive role” and that the scaling back of employment protection, something that the Jobs Study advocated for “ had an overall disequalizing effect.” The OECD report leaves us with hope because it demonstrates that we need to rethink neoliberal economic theory.
  • begin a process of reversing the damage done
  • As recommended by the OECD, this will require that we return to a more equitable taxation and redistribution model, and invest in education and social programs
  • latest mantra—austerity
Shantastic Marie

The Monitor | Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives - 0 views

  •  
    Read later if need more info on previous revolutions, covers Latin America Revolutions & Middle East Revolutions in many part series
Shantastic Marie

"A Policy Response to Canadian Economic Inequality" by Shannon M. Testart - 0 views

  •  
    Published online copy of my thesis!
1 - 18 of 18
Showing 20 items per page