Skip to main content

Home/ ThesisPolitics/ Group items tagged canada

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Shantastic Marie

FAST FACTS: Connecting the Dots | Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives - 0 views

  • rise in attention being paid to the growing poverty and inequality in Canada
  • The Occupy movement can be credited for much of the recent attention but it is the data being released by mainstream institutions and ‘think tanks’ that have made it politically acceptable to challenge the dismal reality. Most recent is the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) report Divided We Stand: Why Inequality Keeps Rising (Dec. 2011). It shines a spotlight on the growing inequality in OECD countries, including Canada, which is shown to have income inequality above the OECD average
  • significant coming from the OECD
  • ...11 more annotations...
  • recognition that significant change is in order
  • economic policies are at the root of the problem. The report acknowledges that the policies that have given us an increasingly low-wage economy, inequitable tax policies and a shrinking social safety net are not serving us well
  • OECD appears to be realizing
  • For the OECD, this is a major shift in thinking
  • Neoliberalism was supposed to make the world a better place for us all.
  • The OECD Jobs study had a significant influence on policy reforms in Canada through the 1990s, many of which were first outlined in the Liberal government’s 1994 policy paper Agenda, Jobs and Growth. This document provided the template for a restructuring of social policy in Canada throughout the 1990s – a template that continues to guide policy today.
  • “Canada spends less on cash benefits such as unemployment benefits and family benefits than most OECD countries. Partly as a result, taxes and transfers do not reduce inequality by as much as in many other countries. Furthermore, their effect on inequality has been declining over time.”
  • “publicly provided services fulfill an important direct redistributive role” and that the scaling back of employment protection, something that the Jobs Study advocated for “ had an overall disequalizing effect.” The OECD report leaves us with hope because it demonstrates that we need to rethink neoliberal economic theory.
  • begin a process of reversing the damage done
  • As recommended by the OECD, this will require that we return to a more equitable taxation and redistribution model, and invest in education and social programs
  • latest mantra—austerity
Shantastic Marie

Will the 'tax the rich' plan scare them away? - Canada - CBC News - 0 views

  • But so too is the policy unlikely to have a huge impact on curbing the $15.3-billion deficit, one of the stated goals of the new tax, according to the premier.
  • Kevin Milligan, a University of British Columbia economics professor
  • A number of politicians have recently been championing the cause of taxing the rich
  • ...9 more annotations...
  • Barack Obama
  • France, Socialist candidate
  • deal with the NDP to support his budget and avoid an election. McGuinty said all revenues from that new tax would be devoted to "accelerating our plan to eliminate the deficit."
  • According to finance officials, about 23,000 people — or 0.2 per cent of tax filers — would pay an average of about $19,000 more in income tax. The Liberals and NDP have estimated the new tax will generate somewhere between $440 million and $570 million. But Milligan said those numbers are "ambitious."
  • "There’s very strong evidence there as well that, especially for the highest earners who have access to really good tax advice, when tax rates go up, they find legal ways to readjust their affairs so they lower their tax bill."
  • Asked about how that might affect overall revenues, Marion Nade, a spokeswoman for NDP Leader Andrea Horwath, said via email that "all governments are concerned with tax avoidance. We support any means of addressing those loopholes."
  • Milligan also said he doubted the tax would scare off the very wealthy.
  • “We know quite a bit about the impact of this kind of tax,” said Milligan. “You hear some people say it will deter business investment , this will deter entrepreneurship. And the evidence on that is pretty strong that that’s not the case.” Milligan said that's because at the very, very high end of income distribution, most of the income is earned income. "These aren’t entrepreneurs and investors. These are people who are working for a living. They are very well-compensated people working for a living, but it just makes it a very different set of people than if these were all investors with a big pot of money wondering where they will invest it." But Milligan said he doesn’t believe top executives won't work as hard or leave the province because they’re earning a couple percentage points less.
  • Milligan estimates that the marginal rate for someone earning over $500,000 would now climb to 49.5 per cent from 46.4 per cent. (When factoring in the provincial surtax, the overall tax hike will actually be 3.12 per cent.) But he also noted that tax rates approaching 50 per cent are common in other very high income OECD countries. He said there is a "tipping point" where pushing the tax rates higher could yield no more revenue, or, in fact, drop the revenue. "I don't think evidence suggests that we’re hitting that point yet. My own best estimate is you have to get rates into the 60s before you stop raising new revenue."
Shantastic Marie

Why Not Harper? - 0 views

  •  
    25 reasons Stephen Harper is bad for Canada
Shantastic Marie

Income Inequality Reframe: The 99% « Framed In Canada - 0 views

  • Occupy Wall Street is shining new light on the question of how to frame income inequality.
  • growinggap.ca project
  • income inequality elicited many and varied response
  • ...23 more annotations...
  • ambiguous
  • gap between the rich and poor
  • couldn’t identify with the rich
  • preventing them from identifying with the poor
  • Rather than see the rise of the richest and the misfortunes of the poorest as a product of a larger system that treats people differently – unfairly – five years ago, the Canadians in our focus groups saw the problem of systemic poverty from an individualistic standpoint
  • struggles of the middle class trying to keep afloat
  • talking about it in terms of the rich and the poor was an unconscious form of ‘othering’
  • And so we shifted the frame, focusing the lens on the gap between the rich and the rest of us
  • systemic problem of poverty
  • show how much the majority of Canadians have in common when it comes to income inequality – that it’s a systemic problem which affects us all
  • inequality heightens social tensions and threatens the health and vibrancy of our democracy
  • Five years and a worldwide recession later (a recession caused by irresponsible financial schemes hatched by a handful of bankers and traders on Wall Street), social unrest has been slowly unfolding
  • Arab Spring
  • G20 protests
  • Occupy Wall Street
  • fed up with a system that has wildly rewarded the richest one per cent while 99 per cent of Americans grapple with a Great Recession whose impact doesn’t seem to be letting up
  • They are showing us they are ready to stare down powerful corporate interests that prevent America from dealing with its serious fiscal and social issues.
  • large groups of citizens taking to the street
  • viewed by the establishment as anarchy
  • threat to rule of law or radical
  • hard limits of the kind of post-9/11 authoritarian constraints on perfectly law-abiding citizens who simply demand their right to be seen and heard. The 99 per cent, the new income inequality frame, has been ignored by governments of all levels, in far too many countries, for far too long.
  • The Wall Street occupants are showing us that when the system isn’t working for the 99 per cent, something is dangerously wrong with our democracy
  • new frame with which to view income inequality in North America: it is about the 99 per cent. It isn’t about individuals or individual failure. It’s about a system that’s failing the vast majority of citizens who believe things can be better than this.
Shantastic Marie

Allan Gregg » 1984 in 2012 - The Assault on Reason - 0 views

  •  
    From Dad
Shantastic Marie

Ontario Poverty Reduction Strategy - 0 views

  • ISAC has been very involved in working to advocate for a poverty reduction strategy in Ontario, and in helping communities voice their needs and expectations for poverty reduction
  • Much of ISAC's work on poverty reduction is done in coalition with other partners
  • Many in the anti-poverty movement worked hard to make sure that the commitment became a reality, and ISAC was instrumental in this work
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • Now that the strategy has been released, ISAC will continue to be involved – primarily through work on the anticipated Social Assistance Review (see below). But we will also continue to advocate for improvements to the strategy, and continue to ensure that government meets its commitments.
Shantastic Marie

TheSpec - Governments have betrayed their promises to the poor - 0 views

  • Betrayal
  • Betrayal
  • ral governments over th
  • ...15 more annotations...
  • . It all started back in 2008 but culminated last week when social assistance rates were frozen and the Ontario Child Benefit (OC
  • Betrayal
  • ments over the last two politically unholy
  • rnments over the last two politically unholy weeks. For the nearly 90,000 people in Hamilton who live below the poverty line, the betrayal has been most stinging from the provincial Liberals. It all started back in 2008 but culminated last week when social assistance rates were frozen and the Ontario Child Benefit (OCB) was stalled by $100 a month. Back in 2008, Dalton McGuinty’s governmen
  • rnments over the last two politically unholy weeks. For the nearly 90,000 people in Hamilton who live below the poverty line, the betrayal has been most stinging from the provincial Liberals. It all started back in 2008 but culminated last week when social assistance rates were frozen and the Ontario Child Benefit (OCB) was stalled by $100 a month. Back in 2008, Dalton McGuinty’s governmen
  • Back in 2008, Dalton McGuinty’s government, through Minister of Children and Youth Services Deb Matthews, was in conversation with Ontario poverty activists about what should be done to reduce the growing depth of poverty. Setting a target to reduce poverty by 25 per cent in five years sounded doable, and academics and planners came up with concrete actions and numbers that could make it happen
  • first betrayal to the unattached adults who live in poverty and have no dependent children
  • People in poverty and those who care about them were disappointed with the announcement but we played nice anyway. We politely applauded the government for making this commitment. We said it was a good first step
  • We played nice even when yet another review of the social assistance system was announced despite the fact that Matthews had completed one just a few years before
  • Now, just months before they were to release their final report, social assistance rates are frozen
  • It is clear the Ontario government has abandoned its Poverty Reduction Strategy, leaving no hope for achieving even the minimal objective of reducing child poverty by 25 per cent in 2013
  • There’s no more time to play nice
  • At a meeting of the Roundtable for Poverty Reduction’s Social Assistance Working Group last week, the usually composed director couldn’t contain his emotion as he apologized to people on OW and ODSP around the table for continuing to build up their hopes for a government response which ended in betrayal
  • Her continued talk about “Ontario families” ignores the reality of thousands of Ontarians who do not live in family situations
  • It’s time to let her know that she must remember and act on behalf of her 90,000 Hamilton sisters and brothers in poverty
1 - 20 of 34 Next ›
Showing 20 items per page