Skip to main content

Home/ Tankebanken/ Contents contributed and discussions participated by Henrik Ryan

Contents contributed and discussions participated by Henrik Ryan

Henrik Ryan

Omstilling til fremtiden - dr.dk/P1/Agenda/Udsendelser - 0 views

  •  
    P1 program om omstillingsbevægelsen (TT)
  •  
    Radioprogram (13. feb. 2010) på en times tid - diverse interviews - bl.a. med Rob Hopkins starteren af Transition Town bevægelsen og lederen af Transition Town Danmark Niels Johan Juhl-Nielsen
Henrik Ryan

Byggefirma med samfundssind - dr.dk/P1/Vita/Udsendelser - 1 views

shared by Henrik Ryan on 12 Feb 10 - Cached
  •  
    CSR som er til at tro på - Logi & Co.
Henrik Ryan

Peak Oil: Life After the Oil Crash - 0 views

  •  
    Artiklen, der linkes til, er tredie side i en længere udredning om, hvilken lære vi kan drage af de udfordringer russerne stod i efter Sovietunionens sammenbrud med deraf følgende sammenbrud i alle aspekter af systemet, hvilket medførte ophør af institutionel ansvars varetagelse på stort set alle områder; økonomi, energiforsyning, fødevareforsyning, sikkerhed etc. Man kommer til at tænke over, hvilke livsfornødenheder man selv ville kunne tage ansvar for at varetage, såfremt en disintegration, af det system man selv indgår i, skulle indtræde.
  •  
    "In the U.S., there is an industry of political commentators and pundits which is devoted to inflaming political passions as much as possible, especially before elections. This is similar to what sports writers and commentators do to draw attention to their game. It seems that the main force behind political discourse in the U.S. is boredom: one can chat about the weather, one's job, one's mortgage and how it relates to current and projected property values, cars and the traffic situation, sports, and, far behind sports, politics. In an effort to make people pay attention, most of the issues trotted out before the electorate pertain to reproduction: abortion, birth control, stem cell research, and similar small bits of social policy are bandied about rather than settled, simply because they get good ratings. "Boring" but vitally important strategic issues such as sustainable development, environmental protection, and energy policy are studiously avoided. Although people often bemoan political apathy as if it were a grave social ill, it seems to me that this is just as it should be. Why should essentially powerless people want to engage in a humiliating farce designed to demonstrate the legitimacy of those who wield the power? In Soviet-era Russia, intelligent people did their best to ignore the Communists: paying attention to them, whether through criticism or praise, would only serve to give them comfort and encouragement, making them feel as if they mattered. Why should Americans want to act any differently with regard to the Republicans and the Democrats? For love of donkeys and elephants?"
Henrik Ryan

Obama er superstjerne uden substans - Politiken.dk - 0 views

  •  
    Naomi Kleins vurdering af Obama
1 - 4 of 4
Showing 20 items per page