barriers to further development exist from an intellectual property perspective
Inventors must also determine if they are in a position to efficiently seize the market opportunity.
regulatory considerations, reimbursement strategies, intellectual property, and business development objectives. This leads to Phase I of the development model.
R&D in Phase II is responsible for generating early concepts. Brainstorming sessions are often held during this stage of development with members of R&D, marketing, and physician consultants. Computational analyses, such as stress and flow studies, are conducted to further understand the behavior of a proposed device. The team often develops a 3D CAD model of a proposed device
A trustee (custodian) for the CHM would be elected by the representatives
to oversee the legal
operation of a collective entity
The representatives would also appoint a Manager, for a parallel
partnership venture, to identify opportunities to develop the common pool resource in accord
with a transparent revenue-sharing formula
Each representative would have power to exercise a
veto with regard to the resource development proposal(s) circulated by the manager.
Once an agreed formula (non-vetoed by the countries) emerged for recognizing needed inputs,
and for overall revenue-sharing, the manager of the nondominium partnership would arrange
open tenders to seek economic partners to maximize the value of the common pool resources.
Revenues from ensuing activities would be distributed to the
association members on the originally-agreed basis
Oversight of compliance would rest with the
nondominium’s trustee
Ostrom’s key principles of successful collective choice
agreements and monitoring by independent auditors.
Moreover, it does not confer the active power of control held under common law
by a Trustee on behalf of beneficiaries,
the proposed negative or passive veto right of stewardship differs
fundamentally from conventional property rights of absolute ownership and temporary use under
Condominium
The Caspian Partnership agreement would comprise a master
framework agreement within which a myriad of associative agreements between the Caspian
littoral nations individually or severally would be registered.”
encourage Ostrom’s user
association-based systems of economic governance
"Areas recognized as being the heritage of mankind are defined by treaties as falling outside of
nation-state jurisdiction and ownership, and are to be instead developed on a basis that benefits
all human beings
the combination of Elinor Ostrom’s economic governance strategies with nondominium legal
structures can lead to a new basis for common pool resources to be developed on a basis
benefiting all of humanity.
“teaming”: bringing together a team of professionals for a specific task
The old cubicle-based, static company is increasingly being replaced by a more fluid and mobile model: “the constant assembly, disassembly, and reassembly of people, talent, and ideas around a range of challenges and opportunities.”
Therefore, the new economy and its “seminomadic workforce” will require “new places to gather, work, live, and interact.”
The consumer electronics company Plantronics, for example, knowing that on any given day 40% of its workforce will be working elsewhere, designed its corporate campus to only 60% capacity
Their joint enterprise, NextSpace, became their first venture into what they call “coworking,” or the creation of “shared collaborative workspaces.”
also nurtures what the authors call “managed serendipity” — ad hoc collaboration between people with diverging but complementary skills
the number of coworking spaces worldwide has shot up from 30 in 2006 to 1,130 in 2011
someone needs to keep an eye on the big picture, to “connect the dots.”
workspaces are designed on a flexible, on-demand and as-needed basis
Coonerty and Neuner found that the most productive collaborations tended to pair highly specialized experts with big-picture thinkers
they were struck by the number of entrepreneurs and freelancers working at coffee shops in the area
Business Talent Group
Clients get the specialized help they need at a cost below that of a full-time employee or traditional consulting firm, and specialists are well compensated and rewarded with flexible schedules and a greater degree of choice about which projects to take.
This has produced a new market dynamic in which the headhunter of yesteryear has been replaced by “talent brokers” who connect highly specialized talent with companies on a project-by-project basis
Matthew Mullenweg, doesn’t have much faith in traditional office buildings or corporate campuses: “I would argue that most offices are full of people not working.”
On the other hand, Mullenweg is a big believer in face-to-face collaboration and brainstorming, and flies his teams all over the globe to do so.
He also set up an informal workspace in San Francisco called the Lounge
Additionally, a 2010 Kauffman-Rand study worried that employer-based health insurance, by discouraging risk-taking, will be an ongoing drag on entrepreneurship
the problem of payroll taxes for freelancers
up to 44% of independent workers encounter difficulty getting paid fully for their work
We heard that the government should be more focussed on helping innovative firms to grow and, particularly, on serving the needs of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)
greater cooperation with provincial programs
innovation support is too narrowly focussed on R&D – more support is needed for other activities along the continuum from
ideas to commercially useful innovation
more productive and internationally competitive economy
whole-of-government program delivery vehicle – the Industrial Research and Innovation Council (IRIC)
SR&ED program should be simplified
includes non-labour costs, such as materials and capital equipment, the calculation of which can be highly complex
the base for the tax credit should be labour-related costs, and the tax credit rate should be adjusted upward
fund direct support measures for SMEs
promoting the growth of firms
facilitating access by such firms to an increased supply of risk capital at both the start-up and later stages of their growth.
building public–private research collaborations
National Research Council (NRC) should become independent collaborative research organizations
become affiliates of universities
create opportunity and demand for leading-edge goods
encouragement of innovation in the Canadian economy should become a stated objective of procurement policies and programs.
the government needs to establish business innovation as a whole-of-government priority
put innovation at the centre of the government's economic strategy
Innovation Advisory Committee (IAC) – a body with a whole-of-government focus that would oversee the realization of our proposed action plan, as well as serve as a permanent mechanism to promote the refinement and improvement of the government's business innovation programs going forward.
focus resources where market forces are unlikely to operate effectively or efficiently and, in that context, address the full range of business innovation activities, including research, development, commercialization and collaboration with other key actors in the innovation ecosystem
the closer the activity being supported is to market, and therefore the more likely it is that the recipient firm will capture most of the benefit for itself.
questions about the nature, variety, and identity
of action
Should we think of the consequences, conventional or causal, of
physical behavior as constituents of an action distinct from but
‘generated by’ the movement? Or should we think that there
is a single action describable in a host of ways?
is something an agent does that was ‘intentional
under some description,’
there have been many attempts to map the relations between intentions
for the future, acting intentionally, and acting with a certain
intention.
There has been a notable or notorious debate about whether the
agent's reasons in acting are causes of the action
rendered the
action intelligible in his eyes
things that
merely happen
things they genuinely do
distinction between
the doings, are the acts or actions of the
agent
what distinguishes an action from a mere happening or occurrence?
An agent performs activity that is
directed at a goal
adopted on
the basis of an overall practical assessment of his options and
opportunities
awareness
that he is performing the activity
and that
the activity is aimed by him at such-and-such a chosen end
It is frequently noted that the agent has some sort of immediate
awareness of his physical activity and of the goals that the
activity is aimed at realizing.
‘knowledge without observation.’
It is also important to the concept of ‘goal directed
action’ that agents normally implement a kind of direct
control or guidance over their own behavior.
For many years, the most intensely debated topic in the philosophy of
action concerned the explanation of intentional actions in terms of
the agent's reasons for acting
Davidson and
other action theorists defended the position that reason explanations
are causal explanations
In the foregoing, reference has been made to explanations of actions
in terms of reasons, but recent work on agency has questioned
whether contemporary frameworks for the philosophy of action have
really articulated the way in which an agent's desires and other
pro-attitudes have the distinctive force of reasons in the setting of
these ordinary explanations
"Topic: Supporting National Contact Points for Horizon 2020 Societal Challenge 2 on 'Food Security, Sustainable Agriculture, Marine and Maritime Research and the Bioeconomy' and the Key Enabling Technology (KET) 'Biotechnology'"
"Topic: Coordination action in support of the implementation by participating States of a Joint Programming Initiative on Agriculture, Food Security and Climate Change"
provide support to a large set of early stage high risk innovative SMEs in the ICT sector
Focus will be on SME proposing innovative ICT concept, product and service applying new sets of rules, values and models which ultimately disrupt existing markets.
We are not a SME and have no classical commercialization plan. We can form an Exchange Firm for example, and offer services for OVNi for example, helping local food networks, providing them infrastructure. But in that case, the business plan for the Exchange Firm should contain a revenue model. Who is going to pay for the deployment of the OVNi in order to make the Exchange Firm commercially viable in the eyes of the Commission?
coaching and mentoring support during phase 1 and phase 2
growth plan and maximising it through internationalisation
Enhancing profitability and growth performance of SMEs by combining and transferring new and existing knowledge into innovative, disruptive and competitive solutions
"Specific Challenge: The challenge is to provide support to a large set of early stage high risk innovative SMEs in the ICT sector. Focus will be on SME proposing innovative ICT concept, product and service applying new sets of rules, values and models which ultimately disrupt existing markets."
The proposals should include an international dimension in particular with the following countries: Brazil, Republic of South Africa, India, Canada, Australia, Russia, United States of America, Japan and China.
encourage the modernisation of institutional practices and culture in research institutions, Higher Education Institutions and funding agencies, to promote Responsible Research and Innovation
increase Responsible Research and Innovation uptake in research organizations
developing a Responsible Research and Innovation Plan covering five RRI keys (societal engagement, gender equality and gender in research and innovation content, open access, science education and ethics) in each participating institution.
"Topic: Innovative ways to make science education and scientific careers attractive to young people"
Link schools to fablabs and makerspaces. SENSORICA is already deploying a strategy and methodology for doing that. These initiatives exposes students to science and technology.
Topic: Innovative schemes for open innovation and science 2.0
INSO-4-2015
open innovation and science 2.0
assist universities to become open innovation centres for their region in cooperation with companies, realising the ERA priorities, and to enable public administrations to drive innovation in and through the public sector.
help universities, companies and public authorities to enhance their capacity to engage in science 2.0 and open innovation.
effective linkages for innovation between universities and companies and other employment sectors, and provide freely accessible innovation training platforms, including digital platforms.
consortia
adopt innovative ways to create new knowledge, new jobs and promote economic growth
a). Inter-sectoral mobility
b) Academia- Business knowledge co-creation
c) Innovation leadership programme for public administrations and researchers
a policy of double nominations
a policy to further and recognise inter-sectoral mobility
This challenge can be addressed through different sets of actions:
develop or (further) implement open innovative schemes to strengthen linkages between academia, industry and community
Research institutions together with companies are expected to build sustainable structures which help to absorb needs of users and thereby become co-creators of new solutions. SMEs should be encouraged to participate.
This is something that really fits SENSORICA. We've been working on this for 2 years now.
developing curricula and providing freely through online platforms, possibly combined with other delivery mechanisms, innovation training for public administrations and researchers.
"Specific Challenge: SMEs play a crucial role in developing resource-efficient, cost-effective and affordable technology solutions to decarbonise and make more efficient the energy system in a sustainable way. They are expected to strongly contribute to all challenges outlined in the legal base of the Horizon 2020 Societal Challenge 'Secure, Clean and Efficient Energy'[1],"