Skip to main content

Home/ scientometrics/ Group items tagged impact

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Alexandre Serres

Impact of Social Sciences - Context is everything: Making the case for more nuanced cit... - 0 views

  •  
    Ryan Whalen. "Context is everything: Making the case for more nuanced citation impact measures." LSE (London School of Economics), 6 janvier 2016
Alexandre Serres

Google Scholar Digest: Journal Scholar Metrics: An international and open access altern... - 1 views

  •  
    Google Scholar. "Journal Scholar Metrics: An international and open access alternative for measuring the citation impact of Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences journals ", 5 mai 2016
manuel durand barthez

Rejection improves eventual impact of manuscripts : Nature News & Comment - 0 views

  •  
    Accroissement potentiel et paradoxal de l'impact d'articles rejetés une première fois et soumis ailleurs une seconde fois
sandrine Wolff

BRIF - Bioresource Research Impact Factor | GEN2PHEN Knowledge Centre - 0 views

  •  
    Groupe de travail pour développer des indicateurs d'usage de ressources biomédicales (matériel biologique hébergé dans des biobanques) sur le modèle des indicateurs bibliométriques (impact factor)
manuel durand barthez

DOAJ, Impact Factor and APCs - 1 views

  •  
    by César Villamizar and Heather Morrison In May 2015 we conducted a pilot study correlating OA APCs and the journal impact factor, using data from 2010, 2013 and 2014. Here are some early results: about 10% of the journals listed in JCR are DOAJ journals over 10% of the journals listed in DOAJ have an...
manuel durand barthez

As PLOS ONE Shrinks, 2015 Impact Factor Expected to Rise - 0 views

  •  
    PLOS ONE's 2015 Impact Factor is expected to rise, the result of its shrinking size. As reported earlier this year, the open access mega-journal has experienced two successive declines in article output, from a peak of 31,509 research papers in 2013 to 28,107 in 2015-a reduction of 3,402 papers or 11%.
manuel durand barthez

Citable Items: The Contested Impact Factor Denominator - 2 views

  •  
    Discussing the Journal Impact Factor inevitably leads one down a rabbit hole. While the numerator of the ratio (total citations) to the journal is clear enough, the denominator (citable items) causes great confusion, and getting a clear answer to its construction requires real work.
Gabriel Gallezot

Scientific insurgents say 'Journal Impact Factors' distort science - 0 views

  • MAY 16, 2013—An ad hoc coalition of unlikely insurgents—scientists, journal editors and publishers, scholarly societies, and research funders across many scientific disciplines—today posted an international declaration calling on the world scientific community to eliminate the role of the journal impact factor (JIF) in evaluating research for funding, hiring, promotion, or institutional effectiveness.
manuel durand barthez

On Moose and Medians (Or Why We Are Stuck With The Impact Factor) - 0 views

  •  
    Le Web of Science et le JCR n'ont pas les mêmes modalités de calcul de cumul de citations. Les calculs de médianes sur le JCR sont impossibles en raison de la dichotomie des deux produits. On reste bloqué sur des calculs de moyennes parce que le JCR ne permet pas de faire autre chose. Il se contente de mentionner à la marge l'Eigenfactor (sans l'expliquer) et le JIF percentile comme alternatives à ses calculs bruts.
manuel durand barthez

CiteScore-Flawed But Still A Game Changer - 0 views

  •  
    Last Thursday, Elsevier announced CiteScore metrics, a free citation reporting service for the academic community. The primary metric promoted by this service is also aptly named CiteScore and is similar, in many ways, to the Impact Factor. Both CiteScore and the Impact Factor are journal-level indicators built around a ratio of citations to documents.
manuel durand barthez

Can Scopus Deliver A Better Journal Impact Metric? | The Scholarly Kitchen - 1 views

  •  
    Divergences sur la définition des Citable Document Types dans le WoS et dans Scopus, mais aussi à propos des paramètres du SNIP (Leiden + Scopus) et du SJR (Scimago + Scopus). Le Post est à la fois pertinent sur sa première partie mais contesté (avec raison) sur la seconde par un bibliométricien du CWTS, à l'origine du SNIP.
manuel durand barthez

Into the gray: a modified approach to citation analysis to better understand research i... - 1 views

  •  
    Associer la littérature grise aux aires d'impact des publications classiques. Peut-être une autre vision de l'Altmetrics ?
1 - 20 of 31 Next ›
Showing 20 items per page