Revolution or Evolution? Technology and Higher Ed

I thought this was a surprisingly optimistic take on the future of higher education, given the somewhat doom-and-gloom first paragraph. I would be pretty okay with most of what is outlined here.

This is a prelude to the future of faculty development and the need to enhance faculty development in the area of engaged student learning for a blended learning environment.

A cognitive theory for the revolution?

However, it is easier to wash your hands than it is to design a first-rate online course. It takes a different skill from classroom teaching, and it is more expensive than chalk. It can be accomplished by faculty working in teams or in conjunction with experienced instructional designers who understand how to create large-scale projects like MOOC's huge, open online courses, which have been pioneered by Stanford and other universities. Either way, most faculty will need help in becoming students again. While more-effective teaching should be its own reward, a major professional-development effort would provide a new opportunity to realign institutional and faculty goals. A radical expression would be to change the rules of tenure to require faculty to teach online or otherwise demonstrate their facility with 21st-century methodologies, as virtually every other employer now requires of their work force.

The more I hear about Canvas, the more I think it has the potential to support useful changes in higher education.

My university will run a pilot with Canvas this Fall. I'll keep you posted on what I hear from faculty and students. Unfortunately, I am not teaching a course which would use Canvas.

A nice focus on the move beyond content-only online education in the last year or so.

Some excellent food for thought and discussion about teaching online.

Three ways teachers are expanding their students' "learning palates"

Elon U. and Pew have released a report based on a survey of over 1000 thought leaders in the areas of education, technology, and cognition. The report argues for a "reinvention" of public education to better serve the millennial generation.

Massive list of links to information on MOOCs

PDF

All MOOCs are not created equal.

Was UVA's president fired because she wasn't responding fast enough to changes in the online learning landscape? Did UVA's board over-react to news about open education initiatives at Harvard, MIT, and Stanford?

Here's what faculty right now are thinking about moving higher ed online.

Death knell of the lecture hall as college moves online? Yes, according to Stanford's president.

George Siemens weighs in on the pace of change.

Provocative title, but a nice overview of P2PU

Ryan Craig argues that the open education movement is waiting for its Southwest Airlines to revolutionize the business, and that none of the current big players (MIT, Stanford, etc.) will play that role.

One of Cathy Davidson's big things is giving students a bigger role in shaping the direction of a course. So it's not surprising that she would point out how most MOOCs don't include any structures for doing so. But such things *do* happen, as I noted in my post here: http://derekbruff.org/?p=2295.