The government wanted to know what would happen if everybody in town received a guaranteed income, and specifically, they wanted to know whether people would still work.
It turns out they did.
Group items matching
in title, tags, annotations or urlRevenu de base: une analyse marxiste | Le Club de Mediapart - 1 views
FCE | Vers un revenu universel ? - 1 views
Nouvelle Donne : Analyse sommaire d'une proposition européenne - 0 views
Un revenu universel pour rénover notre modèle social, Editos et Analyses - 1 views
UP Magazine - Revenu de base et technologies de la singularité : même combat ? - 1 views
Revenu garanti et monde associatif - 0 views
Les robots contre l'emploi - 0 views
La France peut et doit retrouver le plein-emploi - 0 views
A Town Without Poverty?: Canada's only experiment in guaranteed income finally gets reckoning | The Dominion - 0 views
-
-
Only two segments of Dauphin's labour force worked less as a result of Mincome—new mothers and teenagers. Mothers with newborns stopped working because they wanted to stay at home longer with their babies. And teenagers worked less because they weren't under as much pressure to support their families.
-
“People didn't have to take the first job that came along,” says Hikel. “They could wait for something better that suited them.”
- ...3 more annotations...