Group items tagged

Use a staticmethod when you know which class you want to access as you are writing the code.

Use a classmethod if you have a class hierarchy and want the method to operate on the actual class used in the call rather than the class where it was defined:

PyObject *mainmod = PyImport_AddModule("__main__"); PyObject *foo = PyImport_ImportModule("foo"); Py_INCREF(foo); //Increment foo module since PyModule_AddObject() steals reference PyModule_AddObject(mainmod, "foo", foo);

[IPython-user] ipython1 and farm tasking Brian Granger ellisonbg.net@gmail.... Wed Feb 27 16:29:03 CST 2008 Previous message: [IPython-user] ipython1 and farm tasking Next message: [IPython-user] yet another leopard/readline question Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] Alex, First, I would suggest updating your ipython1 install from our svn repository. We are about to push out a major new version and the documentation is _much_ better. Also, there are many new features that will hopefully help you. Here is a simple example (using the latest svn of ipython1): In [1]: from ipython1.kernel import client In [2]: mec = client.MultiEngineClient(('127.0.0.1',10105)) In [3]: tc = client.TaskClient(('127.0.0.1',10113)) In [4]: def fold_package(x): ...: return 2.0*x ...: In [5]: mec.push_function(dict(fold_package=fold_package)) Out[5]: [None, None, None, None] In [6]: tasks = [client.Task("y=fold_package(x)",push={'x':x},pull=('y',)) for x in range(128)] In [7]: task_ids = [tc.run(t) for t in tasks] In [8]: tc.barrier(task_ids) In [9]: task_results = [tc.get_task_result(tid) for tid in task_ids] In [10]: results = [tr.ns.y for tr in task_results] In [11]: print results [0.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, 12.0, 14.0, 16.0, 18.0, 20.0, 22.0, 24.0, 26.0, 28.0, 30.0, 32.0, 34.0, 36.0, 38.0, 40.0, 42.0, 44.0, 46.0, 48.0, 50.0, 52.0, 54.0, 56.0, 58.0, 60.0, 62.0, 64.0, 66.0, 68.0, 70.0, 72.0, 74.0, 76.0, 78.0, 80.0, 82.0, 84.0, 86.0, 88.0, 90.0, 92.0, 94.0, 96.0, 98.0, 100.0, 102.0, 104.0, 106.0, 108.0, 110.0, 112.0, 114.0, 116.0, 118.0, 120.0, 122.0, 124.0, 126.0, 128.0, 130.0, 132.0, 134.0, 136.0, 138.0, 140.0, 142.0, 144.0, 146.0, 148.0, 150.0, 152.0, 154.0, 156.0, 158.0, 160.0, 162.0, 164.0, 166.0, 168.0, 170.0, 172.0, 174.0, 176.0, 178.0, 180.0, 182.0, 184.0, 186.0, 188.0, 190.0, 192.0, 194.0, 196.0, 198.0, 200.0, 202.0, 204.0, 206.0, 208.0, 210.0, 212.0, 214.0, 216.0, 218.0, 220.0, 222.0, 224.0, 226.0, 228.0, 230.0, 232.0, 234.0, 236.0, 238.0, 240.0, 242.0, 244.0, 246.0, 248.0, 250.0, 252.0, 254.0] Or if you don't need load balancing: # This sends the fold_package function for you! results = mec.map(fold_package, range(128)) Let us know if you run into other problems. Cheers, Brian

I hope this article encourages you to think about your command line programs in a different light, and to treat them as first class objects. Using inheritance to share code is so common in other areas of development that it is hardly given a second thought in most cases. As has been shown with the SQLiteAppBase programs, the same technique can be just as powerful when applied to building command line programs, saving development time and testing effort as a result. CommandLineApp has been used as the foundation for dozens of types of programs, and could be just what you need the next time you have to write a new command line program.