Skip to main content

Home/ Groups/ PSU Lecture Capture
Rss Feed
Sort By: Most Recent | Popular Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
bartmon

Study: comparison of lecture capture & f2f course - 0 views

www.springerlink.com/...fulltext.pdf

shared by bartmon on 09 Jun 11 - No Cached
  • bartmon on 09 Jun 11
     
    Fairly robust study, where the researchers examine three groups: - Face-to-face students - Students using lecture capture with just slides and audio - Students using lecture capture with slides, audio and video of prof Students rated the f-2-f session as the best delivery method, but for some reason those students in the two control groups scored the highest on content retention questions. At first I thought maybe they were watching a lecture mutliple times, but study reports most students only watched the lecture once. Odd...
Chris Millet

AJET 27(2) Taplin, Low and Brown (2011) - Students' satisfaction and valuation of web-b... - 1 views

www.ascilite.org.au/...taplin.html

shared by Chris Millet on 26 May 11 - No Cached
  • WBLT is not designed as a distance education tool, but rather as a support mechanism for students who are unable to attend lectures for a variety of reasons (Williams & Fardon, 2007). Generally, no time or money are invested in designing or modifying lecture materials for use in the non-contiguous learning environment, though research suggests this should be considered (Gosper, McNeil, Woo, Phillips, Preston & Green, 2007). The lecture is typically recorded and made available for students to access at a later date (Curtin iLectures, 2009; McKenzie, 2008). This is confirmed by Phillips et al (2007) who conducted a survey of 155 academic teaching staff from across four Australian universities and found 75% made no adaptations to their units to accommodate the use of WBLT.
  • Overall, it has been shown that students tend to use the recordings to supplement the face to face lectures rather than to replace them (McElroy & Blount, 2006; McNeill et al, 2007; Williams & Fardon, 2007). Further, research shows that students generally consider that WBLT enhance their learning experience and improve the quality of their education.
  • Students particularly value lecture recordings for the opportunity they provide to review lectures and prepare for exams and, hence, they see WBLT as being important in helping them achieve better results (Williams & Fardon, 2007; Gosper et al, 2007; Gosper et al., 2008; McKenzie, 2008).
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • Table 2: Descriptive statistics for three traditional valuations of iLectures (N between 208 and 209) ValuationMeanSD% agree 1.My learning experience in this Unit was made positive overall by iLectures3.261.0542.5 2.iLectures helped me achieve better results3.191.0237.5 3.iLectures made it easier for me to learn3.321.0846.9 5 point Likert scale: 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree
  • Although variability is high (extreme responses of 1 and 5 were given for each question) these results indicate a high value was generally attributed to iLectures.
  • Our results suggest that students, on average, value access to WBLT at $15 per unit per semester.
  • Chris Millet on 26 May 11
     
    From a study in Australasian Journal of Educational Technology.. Some mixed results regarding student perceptions of LC, but perhaps not surprising. Many faculty don't adapt their instruction to the technology, and it's often just looked at as a tool to accomodate students who missed lectures. In these cases, the value is minimal. When students use captures as a supplement to instruction, they typically say that it helped them learn.
gary chinn

Is lecture capture the worst educational technology? | Mark Smithers - 0 views

www.masmithers.com/...e-worst-educational-technology

psutlt

shared by gary chinn on 24 May 11 - No Cached
  • Chris Millet on 24 May 11
     
    Some good conversation on this article in the PSU TLT group: http://groups.diigo.com/group/psu-tlt/content/is-lecture-capture-the-worst-educational-technology-mark-smithers-2574049 (you may have to join to view this)
  • gary chinn on 24 May 11
     
    looks like it's viewable without joining the group. that does raise an interesting question, though, about how private we want our working group to be. it's something we can discuss when we meet.
‹ Previous 21 - 25 of 25
Showing 20▼ items per page