What makes the Anthony Weiner story somewhat unique and thus worth discussing for a moment is that, as Hendrik Hertzberg points out, the pretense of substantive relevance (which, lame though it was in prior scandals, was at least maintained) has been more or less brazenly dispensed with here. This isn't a case of illegal sex activity or gross hypocrisy (i.e., David Vitter, Larry Craig, Mark Foley (who built their careers on Family Values) or Eliot Spitzer (who viciously prosecuted trivial prostitution cases)). There's no lying under oath (Clinton) or allegedly illegal payments (Ensign, Edwards). From what is known, none of the women claim harassment and Weiner didn't even have actual sex with any of them. This is just pure mucking around in the private, consensual, unquestionably legal private sexual affairs of someone for partisan gain, voyeuristic fun and the soothing fulfillment of judgmental condemnation. And in that regard, it sets a new standard: the private sexual activities of public figures -- down to the most intimate details -- are now inherently newsworthy, without the need for any pretense of other relevance.
Group items matching
in title, tags, annotations or urlDaily Kos: Jan Logie: We could use someone like her - 0 views
1More
The Republican's Benghazi and NSA Boondoggles |The Political Pragmatic - 0 views
1More
How Corporate America Is Pushing Us All Off a Cliff | MichaelMoore.com - 0 views
1More
Bushonomics, The Meltdown's True Villain - 0 views
11More
Replace Police With Spin Doctors « POLICE INSPECTOR BLOG - 0 views
1More