This sounds like an oblique reference to the Iraq war, which Ed Miliband said
led to "a catastrophic loss of trust" and Ed Balls condemned as "wrong."
Asked directly about those remarks, he says: "The purpose of these
elections is how we build a better tomorrow, not how we debate a better
yesterday." Is that a rebuke to his brother? "No, it's just my
position."
But I suspect that David Miliband, who – unlike the two Eds – had a vote in
2003, still agonises over Iraq. Nor, with the Chilcot inquiry reconvened,
and the war raised at every hustings and meeting, can it easily be consigned
to history. "I've done Chilcot. I've said if I knew then what I know
now, I wouldn't have [backed] it."
Is he saying the war should never have been fought? "The way I put it is
that if we knew then what we know now, there wouldn't have been a war. I've
set out that if we knew there were no WMD, there would have been no UN
resolutions and no war.
"The toll in British and Iraqi life, never mind the toll in trust, has
been very, very high. It's a war we didn't need to fight," he says
before reverting to his previous formula, saying he is mindful of the dead
and doesn't want to "rewrite my own history."
He pauses, conscious that he has gone further than he intended. But his
regrets and reservations over Iraq sound at least equal to those of his
brother and Mr Balls? "Of course. People are dead. I voted in good
faith." Did his brother ever express his misgivings to him? "I'm
not getting into opening up private discussions," he says. "He was
in America at the time."
The other lingering issue of his old brief will surface shortly, with the
Government expected to announce a judge-led inquiry into claims that British
intelligence agencies were complicit in the torture of terrorism suspects.
Mr Miliband hotly denies any policy of collusion. "I would not be sitting
here if I thought there was the slightest suspicion of a doubt that a Labour
government had any entanglement in torture." On last week's High Court
order that M15 and M16 release guidelines alleged to tell British agents to
turn a blind eye to the treatment of terrorism suspects abroad, he says. "After
2001, there was insufficient training and guidelines. That has been
superseded and new guidelines put in place."
Hands off our land: This isn't the planning policy that I drew up - Telegraph - 0 views
Jon Cruddas & Jonathan Rutherford: The time has come for a new socialism - Commentators... - 0 views
The Queen a parasite? No, a penny-pinching paragon (and our rotten MPs should take note... - 0 views
Seize this day | WalesHome.org - 0 views
Little Man in a Toque » Blog Archive » Dear Mr Balls - 0 views
-
"The Department for Children, Schools and Families recently changed its mission statement on its website from (my emphasis): "The purpose of the Department for Children, Schools and Families is to make England the best place in the world for children and young people to grow up." to, "The purpose of the Department for Children, Schools and Families is to make this the best place in the world for children and young people to grow up.""
David Davis' devastating attack on our loss of privacy: This data law has nothing to do... - 1 views
David Miliband: we did not need to fight Iraq war - Telegraph - 0 views
This was New Labour's greatest achievement | Liberal Conspiracy - 0 views
Thatcher's ideology is behind this spending review | Tim Bale | Comment is free | guard... - 0 views
FT.com / Comment / Opinion - Slash and burn won't cure Whitehall - 0 views
-
It is also important that the cuts agenda does not deflect from wider reforms. First, the civil service and ministerial merry-go-round needs to be ended, with project management skills improved. In 2009, I became the fifth transport secretary in barely three years. In my previous three-and-a-half years as schools minister, I served under three secretaries of state in a department renamed and reorganised twice. This is no way to run the country.It is a similar story with the civil service, which is often far from permanent or expert, despite its image. As schools minister, driving forward the multibillion pound academy schools policy to replace failing schools, the biggest single obstacle I faced was the weakness of the Whitehall machine. In eight years I saw six directors of the academies programme come and go, for reasons entirely divorced from the requirements of the programme. All were capable, but policymaking and project management skills were often lacking.
End of college cash incentives to hit East End pupils hardest | News - 0 views
-
More than 30,000 people in the area claim education maintenance allowance which helps poor students aged 16 to 18 afford to stay in school or college. But the scheme is being scrapped by the Government at the end of this academic year.Across London, almost 100,000 teenagers claim payments of between £10 and £30 a week. Figures from the Department for Education show the biggest demand is in east London — more than 5,000 in Newham get the allowance, along with more than 4,000 in Tower Hamlets, compared with 900 in Richmond.
‹ Previous
21 - 40 of 84
Next ›
Last »
Showing 20▼ items per page