Skip to main content

Home/ Copyright Commerce and Culture/ Group items tagged use

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Shrey Jha

Consumed - Mash-up Model - Rob Walker - NYTimes.com - 0 views

  •  
    Interesting Read about the Mashup model, fair use and girl talk - NY Times
as391783

Brands frown on fair use - Entertainment News, International News, Media - Variety - 1 views

  •  
    Bronies
Amanda Marie

The Fifth Fair Use Factor and the Problem With It - 0 views

  •  
    Great article. I must admit to having had some of those very thoughts at different point this semester.
Malika T

The ecstasy of influence: A plagiarism, By Jonathan Lethem (Harper's Magazine) - 0 views

  •  
    not actually news, but an interesting article on plagiarism from 2007. "The idea that culture can be property-intellectual property-is used to justify everything from attempts to force the Girl Scouts to pay royalties for singing songs around campfires to the infringement suit brought by the estate of Margaret Mitchell against the publishers of Alice Randall's The Wind Done Gone." What do you all think of Lethem's article?
as391783

UPDATE 3-Brazil details US cotton retaliation, wants accord | Reuters - 0 views

  •  
    Really interesting potential retaliation against unfair U.S. trade practices with less enforcement of U.S. IP rights.
Emily Albulescu

Britney Spears' 'Hold It Against Me' Likely Safe From Copyright Case - 1 views

  •  
    The Country music duo the "Bellamy Brothers" are upset over Britney song title's resemblance to their 1979 hit but it seem they will not be suing the popstar.
  • ...3 more comments...
  •  
    I'm surprised that copyright law doesn't apply to song titles.
  •  
    I'm actually surprised that the Bellamy Brothers would pursue legal action against her, because song titles are inevitably recycled or given without knowledge of their prior use. I have FIVE different songs called "Heartbreaker" in my iTunes library (Will.i.am, Led Zeppelin, Mariah Carey, MSTRKRFT, Pat Benatar) and none of them are covers. This seems like a classic example of an attempt at manipulating copyright laws for personal gain as opposed to protection of intellectual property.
  •  
    I do not think that the copyright law should be applied to song titles because the title is merely a representation of the song. The title is only a small part of the song that is created and title is not a song that has melody in it. If more copyright restrictions apply to song titles, it would eventually end up holding the artists back from choosing the desired and preferable representation of the song. The artists would have to struggle to find new words or phrases as new songs are released everyday.
  •  
    I know that the Bellamy Brothers specifically mention the title, but I think they would have a much stronger case on the basis of "fixing" the double entendre within the song: the BB's lyrics are "If I said you had a beautiful body / would you hold it against me" vs. Britney's "If I said I want your body now / would you hold it against me." That's pretty startlingly similar, and even if you can't copyright ideas, you can copyright the expression of those ideas... and there's enough overlap between the two to be persuasive.
  •  
    Now that I know copying a song title doesn't count as copyright infringement, I wonder what percentage of a songs lyrics must be exactly the same as another song in order for that to count as copyright infringement. And even if the lyrics happen to be the same, can an artist still avoid a lawsuit if his or her melodic line/ chordal progression/ instrumentation is different enough to make the song "original"? I'm guessing that its a case-by-case thing...
Alexandra Wolff

Facebook: Relax, we won't see your photos - 0 views

  •  
    Because Facebook does not have extensive copyright preferences, artists who share their work on this website are not guaranteed what will happen to their art down the line. As more people choose to use Facebook as a media sharing website, Facebook will have to re-evaluate what rights they grant to you as a user.
Amanda Marie

Robertson joins suit vs. NCAA - Yahoo! Sports - 0 views

  • The new complaint (750k PDF), filed in the United States District Court in San Francisco and obtained by Yahoo! Sports, argues that, “Mr. Robertson’s collegiate image continues to be licensed without his consent to this day … and sold for profit without approval by Mr. Robertson, and without any opportunity for him to participate in the licensing opportunity generated by the use and sale of his own collegiate image.”
  • The NCAA has argued they maintain the rights to a players’ likeness forever in legal briefings. It believes it, its marketing arm – Collegiate Licensing Company – and partner companies Thought Equity Motion and Collegiate Images, LLC are compliant with the law. The organization did not immediately respond to an inquiry about the additional complaints, although it traditionally rejects comment until it has time to review legal documents.
  • At stake is a share of the estimated $4 billion market for collegiate licensed merchandise, a business that has exploded over the last 15 years.
  •  
    Personality rights, a subset of intellectual property/copyright, is a major issue among players in the NCAA.  
Emily Albulescu

DreamWorks Accused of Copying Kung Fu Panda Concept - 1 views

  •  
    I think Mr. Gordon may have a good chance of winning the lawsuit. If you look at the original picture he drew, you can see that it was more than just an idea that was taken and used to make Kung Fu Panda. He even titled his own drawings "Kung Fu Panda Power." When comparing this to Rihanna's infringement for her S&M music video, I feel that Rihanna has a better chance of escaping charges for infringement than does Dreamworks, because Rihanna was able to take photos and recreate them originally into a different form of media. Kung Fu Panda, on the other hand, is an animated film, which means that these photos weigh more heavily because they were not really originally transformed, they are the same pictures, just moving. This will be an interesting case to follow.
Andrea R.

Phone Camera May Raise New Copyright Questions - 0 views

  •  
    The author recounts when he and his wife used their camera phones to snap a few pages from a decor book in Barnes and Noble for ideas to show their contractor. Do you think it is possible to regulate this kind of copying and do you think a cell phone photo of a page or two from a book justifies legal punishment?
Emily Albulescu

Apple Sues Amazon Over App Store Trademark Infringement - 0 views

  •  
    Apple sues Amazon for starting an app store called appstore. Apple's app store is called "App Store". Too similar? In addtion, Amazon is selling a game "Angry Birds Rio" while Apple has the very popular game "Angry Birds" in their app store. I think its a little too similar
Andrea R.

Restoring Copyright to Public Domain Works - 1 views

  •  
    Films by Hitchcock, books by Virginia Woolf and Picasso's Guernica--just to name a few--are some of the works that are no longer readily accessible to the public. In a new case, Golan v. Holder, orchestra conductors, teachers and film archivists, are fighting for the right to perform, adapt and distribute creative works that they relied on for years without having to consider copyrights and their respective fees. Should these famous works be returned to the public domain?
Malika T

Appeals court confirms TiVo patent infringed by Dish | Reuters - 0 views

  •  
    "A federal appeals court upheld a ruling that EchoStar infringed TiVo patents for digital recording technology, raising hopes the long legal battle could end with a TiVo victory."
Andrea R.

Warner Bros. loses again in 'Superman' litigation - 0 views

  •  
    Who has rights to the Superman franchise?
‹ Previous 21 - 40 of 44 Next ›
Showing 20 items per page