Skip to main content

Home/ New Media Ethics 2009 course/ Group items tagged Infographic

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Weiye Loh

WebDev-il: How to make a good infographic - 0 views

  • 1. Data Visualisation Must be data driven - not just fancy looking text (think chart, map etc.) 2. Clean Colour Pallet Must compliment the website, colour must be significant - no MS Paint style colour pallets. 3. Clear Story Should tell a story with pictures - and contain more than one piece of information (good infographics weave different facts and data together). 4. Dimensions Don't make the infographic too big. It has to fit on the average viewers monitor. Max 1000px wide if vertical scrolling or 700px wide if horizontal scrolling (personally I hate horizontal scrolling - it ain't natural!) 5. Not Text Heavy Similar to point No.1 - it should be visual and data driven without too much text. 6. Simple Branding As infographics are used as advertisements the branding must be unobtrusive 7. Subject Matter The content of the infographic must be relevant to the website that hosts it! 8. "AHA!" The infographic should give an "Aha" moment - in other words it should provide a unique insight on the facts that are being presented.
  •  
    Infographics or information graphics are visual representation of data and are a great way to explain complex information in a clear graphical way. These usually take the form of maps, charts and diagrams that are both interesting and appealing. There is a great article over at submitinfographics.com that looks into the eight factors that make a good infographic. 
Weiye Loh

How I Created My First Membership Site [INFOGRAPHIC] - 0 views

  •  
    I launched my Infographic Academy membership site on Monday, and I thought you guys would like to know how I went about creating it. And since it's all about how to create infographics, what better way to show you how I did it than with an infographic?
Weiye Loh

Science: Singapore vs The World - erwinchan - 0 views

  • View SlideshowDownload this gallery (ZIP, undefined KB)Download full size (214 KB) An infographic from FastCompany indicates the highest activity "scientific productivity" in 2003. The number of scientific papers published are the variable and the greater the size of the circle, the greater the number of papers published. The locations of top scientific activity are Boston, London, and New York. The radius of our circle is bigger than the island ourselves.
  • Another project that can help us visualise the impact of our nation's science is from WorldMapper. Worldmapper is a collection of world maps, where territories are re-sized on each map according to the subject of interest. This method helps us to see the familiar island shape much larger and gives us the understanding of how "fat" we are in relation to the world.View SlideshowDownload this gallery (ZIP, undefined KB)Download full size (149 KB) W
Weiye Loh

Want your opinions distorted and misrepresented? Write in to The Straits Time... - 0 views

  • Letter sent by by my good friend Samuel C. Wee to ST on the 8th of March, quoting statistics from their Page One infographic: (Read this closely!) I read with keen interest the news that social mobility in Singapore’s education system is still alive and well (“School system still ‘best way to move up’”; Monday). It is indeed heartwarming to learn that only 90% of children from one-to-three-room flats do not make it to university. I firmly agree with our Education Minister Dr Ng Eng Hen, who declared that “education remains the great social leveller in Singaporean society”. His statement is backed up with the statistic that 50% of children from the bottom third of the socio-economic ladder score in the bottom third of the Primary School Leaving Examination. In recent years, there has been much debate about elitism and the impact that a family’s financial background has on a child’s educational prospects. Therefore, it was greatly reassuring to read about Dr Ng’s great faith in our “unique, meritocratic Singapore system”, which ensures that good, able students from the middle-and-high income groups are not circumscribed or restricted in any way in the name of helping financially disadvantaged students. I would like to commend Ms Rachel Chang on her outstanding article. On behalf of the financially disadvantaged students of Singapore, I thank the fine journalists of the Straits Times for their tireless work in bringing to Singaporeans accurate and objective reporting.
  • What was actually published last Friday, March 18th 2011 A reassuring experience of meritocratic system I READ with keen interest the news that social mobility in Singapore’s education system is still alive and well (‘School system still ‘best way to move up”; March 8). It is indeed heartwarming to learn that almost 50 per cent of children from one- to three-room flats make it to university and polytechnics. I firmly agree with Education Minister Ng Eng Hen, who said that education remains the great social leveller in Singapore society. His statement is backed by the statistic that about 50 per cent of children from the bottom third of the socio-economic bracket score within the top two-thirds of their Primary School Leaving Examination cohort. There has been much debate about elitism and the impact that a family’s financial background has on a child’s educational prospects. Therefore, it was reassuring to read about Dr Ng’s own experience of the ‘unique, meritocratic Singapore system’: he grew up in a three-room flat with five other siblings, and his medical studies at the National University of Singapore were heavily subsidised; later, he trained as a cancer surgeon in the United States using a government scholarship. The system also ensures that good, able students from the middle- and high-income groups are not circumscribed or restricted in any way in the name of helping financially disadvantaged students.
  • To give me the byline would be an outrageous flattery and a gross injustice to the forum editors of ST, who took the liberty of taking my observations about the statistics and subtly replacing them with more politically correct (but significantly and essentially different) statistics.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • Of course, ST reserves the right to edit my letter for clarity and length. When said statistics in question were directly taken from their original article, though, one has to wonder if there hasn’t been a breakdown in communication over there. I’m dreadfully sorry, forum editors, I should have double-checked my original source (your journalist Ms Rachel Chang) before sending my letter.
  • take a look at how my pride in our meritocratic system in my originally letter has been transfigured into awe at Dr Ng’s background, for example! Dear friends, when an editor takes the time and effort to not just paraphrase but completely and utterly transform your piece in both intent and meaning, then what can we say but bravo.
  • There are surely no lazy slackers over at the Straits Times; instead we have evidently men and women who dedicate time and effort to correct their misguided readers, and protect them from the shame of having their real opinions published.
Weiye Loh

So you still think the internet is free... - 0 views

  • 01. Who Is Censoring The Internet? Most countries that are connected to the internet conducts some level of internet censorship.Learn more from OpenNet Initiative's Research.
  • 02. What Is Being Censored On The Internet? Some of the most commonly censored contents include Pornopraphy, Social Networks, Wikipedia, Wikileaks, Political Blogs, Religious Websites and Video Streaming.
  • 03. How Is The Internet Being Censored? The governments have developed a subtle and sophisticated system to establish borders of control within the international cyberspace.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • 04. Why Are They Censoring The Internet? The countries listed here are those that best represent the three major motives behind internet censorshop.
1 - 6 of 6
Showing 20 items per page