Skip to main content

Home/ Groups/ Networked and Global Learning
Rss Feed
Sort By: Most Recent | Popular Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
djplaner

Building digital capability | Jisc - 2 views

www.jisc.ac.uk/...building-digital-capability

bad tpack

shared by djplaner on 23 Oct 15 - No Cached
Charmian LORD liked it
  • djplaner on 23 Oct 15
     
    Project from the UK looking at building "digital capability" links to the "as teacher" interests of some.
djplaner

Mindful or mindless? - Cognitive Edge - 1 views

cognitive-edge.com/...mindful-or-mindless

ngl

shared by djplaner on 23 Oct 15 - No Cached
Charmian LORD liked it
  • A second problem is an over focus on the individual and insufficient focus on their interactions and the need to engage in those interactions
  • Focusing on the individual in isolation from the community is a form of neo-liberal disenfranchisement
  • djplaner on 23 Oct 15
     
    The topic of this post is not directly related to NGL. What I think is relevant/important is the quote an over focus on the individual and insufficient focus on their interactions and the need to engage in those interactions Which I think is a perspective/problem that resonates with NGL. NGL at some level is about encouraging, enabling, and thinking about the interactions - the connections. As you are thinking about your DBR projects, consider how, if, and what your project is doing about the interactions between the people and objects within your particular context. For a concrete example, I'll turn to a particular bandwagon of mine. A couple of people have "as teacher" roles that involve helping teachers use digital technologies effectively. Often the problem here is framed as digital literacy. The individual teacher doesn't know enough about technology to fix the problem. The common solution is to do some form of Professional Development so that the individual can develop the knowledge. Which for me, brings back the quote. - "focus on the individual and insufficient focus on their interactions" A NGL solution to this problem would - I think - focus more (but not entirely) on the interactions.
thaleia66

The Mindset of the Maker Educator: Presentation Materials - 1 views

usergeneratededucation.wordpress.com/...ducator-presentation-materials

education people learning

shared by thaleia66 on 15 Oct 15 - No Cached
Charmian LORD liked it
  • thaleia66 on 15 Oct 15
     
    Dr Jackie Gerstein discusses why we are in a perfect storm for maker education and the maker mindset--new skills and roles (many of which you probably already have on your internal desk)--with a...
djplaner

Wearable technology | rebeccaedu8117 - 1 views

rebeccawhiteedu8117.wordpress.com/...wearable-technology

distributedCognition

shared by djplaner on 13 Oct 15 - No Cached
  • djplaner on 13 Oct 15
     
    Wanted to highlight this from Rebecca to make a point about broadening concepts of NGL. It's about making connections with technologies and without. Often this is interpreted as people creating information for others, or consuming information created by others. Wearable technologies - especially of the type talked about by Rebecca - provide connections to information in a way previously much more difficult. But they can also be used to scaffold learning. e.g. the "learning to run 5Km" app that Rebecca talks about in her previous post. Suggesting a possible way to break out of the LMS and social media into a very different type of network learning.
djplaner

An Evolving Map of Design Practice and Design Research - 1 views

www.dubberly.com/...ctice-and-design-research.html

bad set

shared by djplaner on 12 Oct 15 - Cached
  • djplaner on 12 Oct 15
     
    Has a map that outlines design methods. Could perhaps be something in which to place BAD/SET, but also to ponder with respect to teachers and digital technologies.
  • djplaner on 12 Oct 15
     
    An article that develops a map of different design practices. Given that Assignment 2 is based on "design-based research" and that many of your design instruction/learning for a living (or interest) this should be useful. Where do you place your practice on the map? Where does DBR fit? Can DBR fit in multiple places? Do NGL based learning designs have a particular affinity with anywhere in particular on this map? Personally, I don't think any of these approaches is bad. They each have strengths and weaknesses and each can be done poorly, or brilliantly. But I do think that teachers and researchers tend to cluster toward the left-hand side of the map.
Linda Raymond-Hagen

Differences in Understandings of Networked Learning Theory - Connectivity or Collaborat... - 0 views

www.researchgate.net/..._Connectivity_or_Collaboration

networked learning connectivity collaboration

shared by Linda Raymond-Hagen on 08 Oct 15 - No Cached
  • Linda Raymond-Hagen on 08 Oct 15
     
    Defines Networked Learning, compares NL, connectivism, and constructivism
djplaner

Student Data, Algorithms, Ideology, and Identity-less-ness - 0 views

hackeducation.com/...ttom-ideology-identity-regimes

limitations issues set

shared by djplaner on 06 Oct 15 - No Cached
  • These ideologies permeate new digital learning technologies. They reward the “roaming autodidact” while always judging others as inferior. (A lack of "intrinsic motivation," for example.)
  • We can help students understand their learning history without knowing their identity.”
  • What happens to bodies – particularly bodies of marginalized people – when they're submittted to a new knowledge regime that claims to be identity-less, that privileges identity-less-ness?
  • djplaner on 06 Oct 15
     
    Picks up on some issues around MOOCs and other more recent implementations of NGL.
thaleia66

Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self-determined ... - 1 views

www.irrodl.org/...2087

shared by thaleia66 on 30 Sep 15 - No Cached
  • Pedagogical, even andragogical, educational methods are no longer fully sufficient in preparing learners for thriving in the workplace, and a more self-directed and self-determined approach is needed, one in which the learner reflects upon what is learned and how it is learned and in which educators teach learners how to teach themselves (Peters, 2001, 2004; Kamenetz, 2010).
  • Heutagogy is of special interest to distance education, which shares with heutagogy certain key attributes, such as learner autonomy and self-directedness, and has pedagogical roots in adult teaching and learning.
  • Distance education and heutagogy also have in common the same audience: mature adult learners.
  • ...19 more annotations...
  • Web 2.0 design supports a heutagogical approach by allowing learners to direct and determine their learning path and by enabling them to take an active rather than passive role in their individual learning experiences. Key affordances of social media – connectivity with others, information discovery and sharing (individually and as a group), and personal collection and adaptation of information as required – are also affordances that support self-determined learning activities (McLoughlin & Lee, 2007, p. 667). In addition, Web 2.0 encourages interaction, reflection in dialogue, collaboration, and information sharing, as well as promotes autonomy and supports creation of learner-generated content (Lee & McLoughlin, 2007; McLoughlin & Lee, 2008, 2010).
  • A key attribute of andragogy is self-directed learning
  • Within transformational learning, learning occurs along a self-directed path; as the learner matures and reflects on life experiences in relation to his or her self-perception, beliefs, and lifestyle, the learner perspective is adjusted and transformative learning can occur
  • The role of the educator in an andragogical approach is that of tutor and mentor, with the instructor supporting the learner in developing the capacity to become more self-directed in his or her learning. The instructor shows learners how to find information, relates information to the learner experience, and places a focus on problem-solving within real-world situations (McAuliffe et al., 2008). Instructors establish objectives and curriculum based on learner input and guide students along the learner path, while the responsibility for learning lies with the learner.
  • Heutagogy applies a holistic approach to developing learner capabilities, with learning as an active and proactive process, and learners serving as “the major agent in their own learning, which occurs as a result of personal experiences”
  • As in an andragogical approach, in heutagogy the instructor also facilitates the learning process by providing guidance and resources, but fully relinquishes ownership of the learning path and process to the learner, who negotiates learning and determines what will be learned and how it will be learned (Hase & Kenyon, 2000; Eberle, 2009).
  • The heutagogical approach can be viewed as a progression from pedagogy to andragogy to heutagogy, with learners likewise progressing in maturity and autonomy (Canning, 2010, see Figure 2).
  • More mature learners require less instructor control and course structure and can be more self-directed in their learning, while less mature learners require more instructor guidance and course scaffolding (Canning & Callan, 2010; Kenyon & Hase, 2010).
  • In an andragogical approach to teaching and learning, learners are actively involved in identifying their needs and planning on how those needs will be met
  • learners are self-directed to continue to learn on their own and “can personalize their learning paths in the way they desire
  • Recent research also indicates that the use of social media can support self-determined learning.
  • Learner-generated content (active media use): Active use of social media in creating learner-generated content seems to contribute to development of skills of self-directedness. Initial research findings by Blaschke, Porto, and Kurtz (2010) indicate that active use of social media, for example, development of learner-generated content, supports cognitive and metacognitive skill development, whereas passive use (consumption) is less effective in supporting development of these skills.
  • Research on the use of social media and its role in supporting heutagogy is limited, however, indicating that this is an area for further investigation.
  • A heutagogical approach to learning and teaching is characterized first and foremost by learner-centeredness in terms of both learner-generated contexts and content.
  • Guiding learners to define self-directed questions is one of the biggest challenges facing developers of heutagogical courses, as designers must be “creative enough to have learners ask questions about the universe they inhabit”
  • Negotiated and learner-defined assessment has been shown to improve the motivation of learners and their involvement in the learning process, as well as make learners feel less threatened by instructor control of their learning process
  • Heutagogy’s holistic approach takes into account the learner’s prior learning experiences and the way in which these influence how she or he learns; by considering these past experiences and the learner’s current experience and reflecting upon these, the learner moves into a growth process that has the potential to lead to transformative learning
  • The literature review conducted here indicates that there is substantial work to be done in researching heutagogy within this research construct, for example examination of the means in which Web 2.0 and social media support a self-determined teaching and learning approach, and investigation of the effectiveness of the approach in higher education and in creating lifelong learners able to effectively and successfully translate competencies into capability in complex, real-world situations. Another area of research includes defining and testing criteria for heutagogy as a framework for teaching and learning.
  • By incorporating heutagogical practice, educators have the opportunity to better prepare students for the workplace and for becoming lifelong learners, as well as to foster student motivation by cultivating students who “are fully engaged in the topic they are studying because they are making choices that are most relevant or interesting to them” (Kenyon & Hase, 2010, p. 170).
Linda Raymond-Hagen

Education 3.0: Altering Round Peg in Round Hole Education | User Generated Education - 1 views

usergeneratededucation.wordpress.com/...nd-peg-in-round-hole-education

shared by Linda Raymond-Hagen on 30 Sep 15 - No Cached
  • Linda Raymond-Hagen on 30 Sep 15
     
    What follows is my Ignite talk for ISTE 2013.  It was rejected by the selection committee.  As I already conceptualized the talk and think it is such an important topic, I am disseminating my text ...
  • Linda Raymond-Hagen on 30 Sep 15
     
    What follows is my Ignite talk for ISTE 2013.  It was rejected by the selection committee.  As I already conceptualized the talk and think it is such an important topic, I am disseminating my text ...
djplaner

Neurotic Neurons - 2 views

ncase.me/neurons

networkedlearning neurons

shared by djplaner on 26 Sep 15 - No Cached
thaleia66 liked it
  • djplaner on 26 Sep 15
     
    For Stephen Downes one of the strengths of connectivism is that networks offer an explanation of how learning occurs "all the way down". Something that constructivism/cognitivism tend not to do. This interactive animation/learning object introduces the ideas of Hebbian and anti-Hebbian learning in the context of fears. It provides (at least for me) a useful and interesting introduction of how networks (in the form of neurons learn.
‹ Previous 21 - 40 of 359 Next › Last »
Showing 20▼ items per page