Group items matching

in title, tags, annotations or url

Are you aware of the patent litigation and the rights you possess as a patent holder? Do not worry at all! Feel free to simply get in touch with us at Unified Patents and we will make you very well aware of everything related to patent litigation. Call us at 650-999-0899

Get valuable NPE Patent Litigation advice from the globally recognized team of Unified Patents specialized in the area of technology. Google, Toyota, Master Card, Philips and there are many other industry leading brands that trust our team for patent litigation and insurance.

Kenya Police Civilian Complaints Board

On May 19, 2016, Unified Patents Inc. filed a petition for inter partes review, IPR2016-01060, against claims 1-4, 9, 10, and 21 of U.S. Patent 8,933,945, directed to a method for optimizing memory requests by dividing them.

On September 8, 2016, Unified Patents Inc. filed its 55th petition for inter partes review, challenging all claims of U.S. Patent 6,442,261 as unpatentable over multiple grounds. The patent, related to identifying dropped telephone calls, had been asserted against automotive companies. A copy of the petition can be found below.

On August 31, 2016, Unified Patents Inc. filed against a patent owned by Plano Encryption Technologies, LLC. The patent, U.S. 6,466,983, has not been asserted in any district court to date. A copy of the petition can be found below. Unified Patents Inc. v. Plano Encryption Technologies, LLC, IPR2016-01644, Paper 1 (Aug.

Patent is the set of exclusive rights given to the inventor of anything that no other person or company has invented earlier. In case any other person starts making that particular product, without the consent of original patent holder or inventor, then it is categorized as infringement.

On July 25, 2016, Unified Patents Inc. filed a petition for inter partes review of all claims 1-15 of U.S. Patent 6,415,207. In IPR2016-01465, Unified challenged a patent directed to automated tracking, one that Shipping and Transit has asserted against more than 90 small businesses. A copy of the filing can be found below.

On May 27, 2016, Unified filed a petition for inter partes review (IPR) of claims 1, 4, 6, 7, 10-13, and 16 of U.S. Patent 8,706,627, owned and asserted by Sentegra, LLC in various district courts. The technology is directed to electronic ticketing on a mobile device.

Data suggests an inter partes review (IPR) institution decision is a defining moment in underlying litigation. Unified examined all district court settlements involving patents subject of IPR. The data revealed parties have shifted toward earlier settlements, usually just before an expected institution decision. The movement to pre-institution settlement shows the direct effects of PTAB on District Court.

Unified Patents Inc. filed to terminate IPR2015-00874 based on a settlement with Hall Data Sync Technologies LLC. The settlement details are confidential.

Overview Overall, 1st Half 2016 litigation (2187 cases) was down from similar time frames in the last several years (Figure 1). Q2 2016 litigation was 31% higher than Q1 2016 (Figure 4). Almost 90% of High-Tech litigation continues to be NPE related (Figure 8).

Through almost four years and nearly fifty patentability challenges, Unified Patents (UPI) has never lost a real party-in-interest (RPI) decision before the PTAB. Here are some of those decisions. Unified's members were not found to be RPIs, where there was no evidence of funding or control of a particular IPR.