InnoDev

analyza a suhrn mnohych biometrickych projektov

out of 5 dentists agree that multi-threaded programming is hard to get right. At the end of the day, all that the GIL guarantees is that MRI's native C implementations of Ruby methods will be executed atomically (but even this has caveats). ... So the GIL doesn't 'solve' thread-safety issues. ... One way that we work with hard problems is with good abstractions. ... We're seeing more and more abstractions around threads. An approach that's catching on in the Ruby community is the Actor model of concurrency, with the most popular implementation being Celluloid. Celluloid provides a great abstraction that marries concurrency primitives to Ruby's object model. Celluloid can't guarantee that your code will be thread-safe or free from race conditions, but it wraps up best practices. I encourage you give Celluloid a try.

Look at recent Microsoft releases: we don't fix old features, but accrete new ones. New features help much more at review time than improvements to old ones. (That's literally the explanation for PowerShell. Many of us wanted to improve cmd.exe, but couldn't.)

Pre inspiraciu

Definitely less code but what is it doing? .pluck is a (misplaced?) calculation method that, like described above, is returning an array of results based

Part 2

 global Automated Fingerprint Identification System market will grow at a CAGR of 19.71 percent over the period 2012-2016.

Part 1 of the article

personally think that developers shouldn't care about code beauty, because that's not their job. Instead, they should focus on creating great products, which is infinitely more satisfying. Code Fashion What defines beauty in code? Just like for clothes, opinions on the subject may vary. Each year, we find new trend-setters, like Jeff Atwood, Martin Fowler, or Eric Evans. They offer convincing arguments to explain why pattern A is better than pattern B. Until someone else publishes a book, explaining that pattern C is much, much better

Cognitive dissonance is the most often cited reason for claims for independent testing teams. IF the tester is part of the development team that created the product, then he will be biased to confirm the product is working.