Panasonic (oligopolistic firm) is considering to cut workers due to recession, so microeconomics on oligopoly with the x-axis with quantity and y-axis with price can be made.
I assume this section is saying that they are trying to reduce costs of production and increase efficiency. However, in most cases if a firm tries to lower the price they would lose customers due to price war between other firms that produce homogenous goods so it would be risky to change prices when its oligopoly. Although, their main aim is to recover its business so they are trying to cut many workers, reduce costs and increase efficiency.
recovery of its business performance at an early date by speeding up decision-making, in addition to cost cuts after logging a massive group net loss in the business year
I assume that "new growth areas" is to move the company to a more rural area because having a business at a city has a high land cost where rural areas can be much cheaper therefore, this can benefit the firm by having the cost curves to shift outward.
One of the factors of production, capital by having new technology such as (mentions here) solar panels. It reduces the light energy use, etc costs in the company.
Maize is a good, which has many complimentary goods, because it is a staple food in many recipes. This can be shown in a cross price elasticity diagram.
It is also a substitute good. Though carbs of some kind are a necessity, people could by wheat or rice or millet instead. You could consider looking at prices of substitute goods.
There is high demand for maize, so this good is inelastic and therefore it is smart to place a floor price on this good, since price will increase with little change to the demand.
By setting a price floor, maize prices will increase so that the good is more valued and this will lead to less wasting and more available supply in the long-run.
The economic growth in India has slowed down as the figures show for the first quarter of this year as it only expanded by 5.3%. There could be different reasons for this.
The strike came on the same day as shock economic growth figures for the January-March quarter showed the slowest quarterly expansion in nine years, of 5.3 per cent
The listless economy, high inflation and a series of corruption scandals have weakened the coalition government headed by the 79-year-old Singh and his Congress party
Here some problems are mentioned, which would impact the recent decrease in growth and thus the rise in fuel costs.
Last week, Indian state-run oil firms announced the sharpest jump in petrol prices in nearly a decade to offset growing losses caused by subsidised rates
Once taxes are included, the price increase of Rs6.28 (11 US cents) per litre will result in a Rs7.5-rupee rise for consumers in cities such as Delhi
11% increase in fuel costs, going from Rs 6.28 per litre to Rs 7.5.
Growth figures for the first quarter showed the slowest expansion in 9 years of 5.3%.
Listless economy, high inflation and corruption has weakened the economy. Annual inflation is currently at 7%
Toyota has extended production cuts at its factories in Thailand and Japan due to shortage of parts in the wake of floods in Thailand. The company said production in Thailand will remain suspended, while Japanese units will work at reduced capacity until 12 November.
America's corn farmers have been benefiting from annual federal subsidies of around $6 billion in recent years, all in the name of ethanol used as an additive for the nation's vehicles.
Tax credit, a form of subsidy, keeps the price low and companies profitable.
corn ethanol, which now takes a larger share of the U.S. corn crop than cattle, hogs and poultry, as a factor in driving food prices higher.
What the industry doesn’t want to see, however, is an end to a separate tax credit for ethanol made not from corn but non-foodstuffs like switchgrass, wood chips and even the leaves and stalks of corn.
Possible evaluations 1) why government wants to keep one type of subsidy while getting rid of the another type?
2) pros and cons of keeping this subsidy
Possible evaluations 1)pros and cons of having subsidies for ethanol 2)was the subsidy effective 3) why did the government implement this in the first place 4) what could the government have used other than tax credit