An interesting, critical appraisal of MOOCs' transformative potential by education historian Larry Cuban. Includes some hilarious graphics, in addition to good insights...
Lessons learned from Cisco's experience indicate that business-education partnerships should:
* Be set up so that all aspects of the project are transparent to outsiders, even if corporations profit from the R&D
* Foster experimentation, because it is not always clear in advance which ideas and projects will work best
* Establish in-depth training for every new technology, with businesspeople and educators learning from each other
This article is not about emerging tech directly. However, it discusses how there is an initiative to increase teaching students to be innovators consistent with 21st century learning. When I read this, I thought about all the ways that technology could facilitate this.
I wonder if different types of technology have different impacts. For example, I can absolutely see where students wouldn't be motivated by a digital whiteboard or a blog...too adult and too similar to traditional education. But what about things like games for learning? Would they draw in a non-traditional student and actually motivate them to learn, albeit indirectly? There seems to be research on the gamification aspect that shows its positive impact, so do Bill's comments only apply to a subset of educational technology?
For those who pine for film over digital movies, miss the clackety-clack of typewriters, or even rotary dial phones, well, get ready for the slow-motion demise of brick-and-mortar schools.
COLLEGES TAKING OVER THE ENTIRE LEARNING PROCESS!
STANFORD HAS STARTED --- OTHERS WILL FOLLOW!
Is engagement in learning the most important characteristic you look for in a technology-rich school, then?
Do you think that learning that occurs online is different from learning that happens in traditional classrooms?
Access to rural areas?....
"Yet one of the most significant things Sahlberg said passed practically unnoticed. "Oh," he mentioned at one point, "and there are no private schools in Finland."
This notion may seem difficult for an American to digest, but it's true. Only a small number of independent schools exist in Finland, and even they are all publicly financed. None is allowed to charge tuition fees. There are no private universities, either. This means that practically every person in Finland attends public school, whether for pre-K or a Ph.D."
I love this quote, too:
'As for accountability of teachers and administrators, Sahlberg shrugs. "There's no word for accountability in Finnish," he later told an audience at the Teachers College of Columbia University. "Accountability is something that is left when responsibility has been subtracted."'
American's are SO good at blaming everything and everyone ELSE for what is wrong with education in this country. Good for Sahlberg. I might just have to move my family to Finland!
When we think about education reform, we usually focus on teacher quality. The big battleground in education revolves around holding teachers accountable for their performance. With all the focus on teachers, however, one group that is often forgotten as a key learning resource are the students themselves.
Kind of interesting...but two schools (HS and University?) in Canada are sponsoring a MOOC for school leaders on how to push your school / organization forward.
Nice article on how technology is evolving and revolutionizing our lives. It talks about integrating technology into education (positive and negative comments, reallocation of federal funds in innovative technology, etc)
"Digital natives, techno savvy, comfortable with self-directed learning" - I very much agree with this description of 21st century students. There's no other way to reform education and learning but to embrace this fact, but unfortunately it will take time.
This blog post has relevance for what happens, and why, when education reformers (including technologists!) put out good ideas and watch them not get implemented, or not get implemented transformationally, on the ground in schools.
"I want the Department to become an engine of innovation, not a compliance
monitor," said Secretary Duncan. "We are looking to you - the districts and
nonprofits - to unleash your creativity and build the next generation of
education reform."
According to
research conducted by ACT, currently,
-- Fewer than 20 percent of 8th-grade students are on target for being
college ready in all four core subject areas of English, math,
reading,
and science.
-- Only 70 percent of ACT-tested 2009 high school graduates took a core
curriculum.
-- Only 23 percent of ACT-tested 2009 high school graduates were college
ready in all four core subject areas of English, math, reading, and
science.
"We are committed to ensuring that all students are
college and career ready in achievement, psychosocial behavior, and career and
educational planning," said Erickson. "Rigor & Readiness will also create and
advance school change, and build and support high-achieving, self-sustaining
schools within scalable, replicable systems.